similar to: u2f / libfido2 version

On 2019-11-14, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > Please give this a try - security key support is a substantial change and > it really needs testing ahead of the next release. Hi Damien, Thanks for working on security key support, this is a really nice feature to have in openssh. My non-FIDO2 security key (YubiKey NEO) doesn't work with the latest changes to openssh

Hi, As of this morning, OpenSSH now has experimental U2F/FIDO support, with U2F being added as a new key type "sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 at openssh.com" or "ecdsa-sk" for short (the "sk" stands for "security key"). If you're not familiar with U2F, this is an open standard for making inexpensive hardware security tokens. These are easily the cheapest way

I was recently looking at verifying the attestation data (ssh-sk-attest-v00) for a SK key, but I believe the data saved in this structure is insufficient for completing verification of the attestation. While the structure has enough information for U2F devices, FIDO2 devices sign their attestation over a richer "authData" blob [1] (concatenated with the challenge hash). The authData blob

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Damien Miller wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Damien Miller wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As of this morning, OpenSSH now has experimental U2F/FIDO support, with > > U2F being added as a new key type "sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 at openssh.com" > > or "ecdsa-sk" for short (the "sk" stands for "security key").

I updated to the latest versions of libfido2 and openssh-portable tonight, with an intention to test out the security key functionality and look closely at the changes over the last couple of months to see if I need to change anything in my AsyncSSH implementation to stay in sync. However, it seems that libfido2 no longer provides the ?libsk-libfido2.so? library that it used to. That was something

I've had a patch on the bugzilla for a while related to U2F with support for a few additional settings such as providing a path to a specific key to use instead of the first one found and setting if user presence is required when using the key. Is there any objection to folding those parts in if appropriate? Joseph, to offer comment on NIST P-256. There was originally quite a limited subset

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 Bug ID: 2319 Summary: [PATCH REVIEW] U2F authentication Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hello, I'm helping the Git for windows team and contributing in git-for-windows repository to help expand the OpenSSH support for fido2 devices on Windows. Currently we are using your internal implementation(sk-usbhic.c) however since Windows 10 version 1903 this requires administrator privileges. I'm trying to create a module for OpenSSH to use webauthn.dll instead of direct calling to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3188 Bug ID: 3188 Summary: Problems creating a second ecdsa-sk key for a second Yubikey Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen

Dear all, I did try to google search the archives [1] but cannot find any information on this. Would it be possible to somehow implement a passwordless (or as a 2FA) to login to a remote samba (linux server)? Any suggestions greatly appreciated, Greg 1. https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/

Hey, Judging from the (private) responses I?ve got, there is quite a bit of interest in the U2F feature I proposed a while ago. Therefore, I?ve taken some time to resolve the remaining issues, and I think the resulting patch (attached to this email) is in quite a good state now. I also posted the new version of the patch to https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 (which I?ve opened

Hi Damien, On Nov 14, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Damien Miller wrote: >> As of this morning, OpenSSH now has experimental U2F/FIDO support, with >> U2F being added as a new key type "sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 at openssh.com" >> or "ecdsa-sk" for short (the "sk" stands for "security

That sounds like the application param is still used as part of the process though? Would allowing the user to specify the application work in the Solokey case? What is stored in the private keyfile? The documentation says no private key is stored there. So is it just information used to reseed the public/private key? Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: openssh-unix-dev

On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > As said in James Bottomley's message and djm's reply, doing similar in > ssh is not possible without significantly changing the protocol: > > https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2020-January/038092.html so how does Google change the protocol to support u2f? not supporting authentication from multiple machines

In the u2f protocol, my understanding is in the normal case, the web browser seeds the keypair process with the hostname of the remote server. In the case of ssh, the hostname is probably not what I would want to do. But the u2f protocol seems to have a way to handle this. It just needs to be exposed to the user. The content of the private keyfile in ssh is generated somehow. Where is that done?

Hi, OpenSSH 8.2p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a feature release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the instructions at

At this point it should be obvious, but let me state that I don?t have motivation/time to spend on this right now, given that upstream shows 0 interest in this at all :(. Hence, any help on this is welcome. On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Habets <thomas at habets.se> wrote: > On 24 December 2014 at 18:57, Michael Stapelberg > <stapelberg+openssh at google.com> wrote:

Hi, OpenSSH 8.4p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the instructions at

On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > David Lang: > >> not supporting authentication from multiple machines seems to defeat the >> purpose of adding u2f support. > > It works just like other SSH key types. You have a private SSH key > and a public one, and you can copy the private key to multiple > machines or load it into ssh-agent and use agent

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > At this point it should be obvious, but let me state that I don?t have > > motivation/time to spend on this right now, given that upstream shows > > 0 interest in this at all :(. > > That's not how I recall it. When you