similar to: Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.9

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.9"

2019 Oct 01
9
Call for testing: OpenSSH 8.1
Hi, OpenSSH 8.1p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the instructions at
2018 Oct 14
4
Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.9
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Jakub Jelen wrote: > Something like this can be used to properly initialize new OpenSSL > versions: > > @@ -70,12 +70,19 @@ ssh_compatible_openssl(long headerver, long libver) > void > ssh_OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(void) > { > +#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L > OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(); > > /* Enable use of crypto
2020 Mar 13
1
Asterisk 16, 9.0 - res_rtp_asterisk compilation error
Le 13/03/2020 à 13:30, Joshua C. Colp a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM Administrator <admin at tootai.net > <mailto:admin at tootai.net>> wrote: > > Hello, > > 2 asterisk servers 16.8.0 version running on Debian 10.3 On one of > them, > I can't compile asterisk having error > >     [CC] res_rtp_asterisk.c ->
2020 Mar 13
2
Asterisk 16, 9.0 - res_rtp_asterisk compilation error
Hello, 2 asterisk servers 16.8.0 version running on Debian 10.3 On one of them, I can't compile asterisk having error    [CC] res_rtp_asterisk.c -> res_rtp_asterisk.o res_rtp_asterisk.c:2674:3: error: ‘pj_ice_sess_cb’ {aka ‘struct pj_ice_sess_cb’} has no member named ‘on_valid_pair’   .on_valid_pair = ast_rtp_on_valid_pair,    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ res_rtp_asterisk.c:2674:19: warning:
2018 Jun 08
2
vanilla build of 7.7p1 release on linux/4.17 fails with gcc8 @ "/usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-z,retpolineplt'"
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 06:14:42PM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 6/7/18 6:08 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > > Well the intent is you should be able to set CC and LD to whatever you > > want as long as they work. In this case, the OSSH_CHECK_LDFLAG_LINK > > test invokes autoconf's AC_LINK_IFELSE with uses CC not LD. I'm not > > sure what to do about it yet though. I
2018 Nov 19
2
[PATCH] openssl-compat: Test for OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms before using.
OpenSSL 1.1.0 has deprecated this function. --- configure.ac | 1 + openbsd-compat/openssl-compat.c | 2 ++ openbsd-compat/openssl-compat.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 3f7fe2cd..db2aade8 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -2710,6 +2710,7 @@ if test "x$openssl" = "xyes" ; then ])
2018 Jun 07
2
vanilla build of 7.7p1 release on linux/4.17 fails with gcc8 @ "/usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-z,retpolineplt'"
Verifying a report I just got pinged about, building vanilla openssh 7.7p1 on linux configures ok, but fails build around 'retpoline' I've started looking through recent reports; haven't _yet_ found anything similar. While I continue, is any of the following familiar/expected? Either known bug/issue or env conflict? The current env includes supposedly retpoline-ready GCC 8.1.1,
2017 Sep 23
3
Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.6
> Portable OpenSSH is also available via [...] Github: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable > > Running the regression tests supplied with Portable OpenSSH does not require installation and is a simply: > > $ ./configure && make tests I was going to try this on Kali Linux (latest version), but ran into trouble right away. No "configure" script exists
2010 Jan 28
6
[Bug 1707] New: Tweak OpenSSL ENGINE support to use openssl config system
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1707 Summary: Tweak OpenSSL ENGINE support to use openssl config system Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo:
2015 Aug 11
3
libfuzzer questions
First off, thanks -- this is a pretty great library and it feels like I'm learning a lot. I'm getting some more experience with libfuzzer and finding that I have a couple of questions: - How does libfuzzer decide to write a new test file? What distinguishes this one from all the other cases for which new test inputs were not written? Must be something about the path taken through the
2014 May 29
2
libguestfs error
Hi I'm getting following error while compiling libguestfs-1.26.1... CCLD guestfish guestfish-progress.o: In function `progress_bar_init': /home/ubuntu/libguestfs-1.26.1/fish/progress.c:123: undefined reference to `tgetent' guestfish-progress.o: In function `progress_bar_set': /home/ubuntu/libguestfs-1.26.1/fish/progress.c:282: undefined reference to `tgetnum'
2008 Feb 11
6
[Bug 1440] New: OpenSSL engine support should be enabled by default
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1440 Summary: OpenSSL engine support should be enabled by default Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: Build system AssignedTo:
2023 Mar 29
1
ChaCha20 Rekey Frequency
I was wondering if there was something specific to the internal chacha20 cipher as opposed to OpenSSL implementation. I can't just change the block size because it breaks compatibility. I can do something like as a hack (though it would probably be better to do it with the compat function): if (strstr(enc->name, "chacha")) *max_blocks = (u_int64_t)1 << (16*2);
2014 Jan 05
2
Build libguestfs error with undefined reference to `tgetnum'
Hi I want to build libguestfs on my laptop. I run Centos 6.4, libguestfs libguestfs-1.24.3. I get this error: Wide character in print at /root/libguestfs-1.24.3/podwrapper.pl line 418. podwrapper.pl: wrote guestfish.1 podwrapper.pl: wrote ../html/guestfish.1.html touch stamp-guestfish.pod CCLD guestfish guestfish-progress.o: In function `progress_bar_set':
2023 Mar 29
2
ChaCha20 Rekey Frequency
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Chris Rapier wrote: > I was wondering if there was something specific to the internal chacha20 > cipher as opposed to OpenSSL implementation. > > I can't just change the block size because it breaks compatibility. I can do > something like as a hack (though it would probably be better to do it with the > compat function): > > if
2023 Mar 29
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: ChaCha20 Rekey Frequency
I'm hardly an expert on this, but if I remember correctly, the rekey rate for good security is mostly dependent on the cipher block size. I left my reference books at home; so, I can't come up with a reference for you, but I would take Chris' "I'm deeply unsure of what impact that would have on the security of the cipher" comment seriously and switch to a cipher with a
2023 Mar 29
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: ChaCha20 Rekey Frequency
That's true for block ciphers, but ChaCha20+poly1305 is a stream cipher. On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Robinson, Herbie wrote: > > I?m hardly an expert on this, but if I remember correctly, the rekey rate > for good security is mostly dependent on the cipher block size.? I left my > reference books at home; so, I can?t come up with a reference for you, but I > would take Chris?
2011 Aug 17
1
openssh-unix-dev Digest, Vol 100, Issue 3
Works on my netbsd tinkerbox. NetBSD 5.0.2 NetBSD 5.0.2 (GENERIC) It uses rlimit. Privsep sandbox style: rlimit I also get warnings during make. fmt_scaled.c: In function 'scan_scaled': fmt_scaled.c:84: warning: array subscript has type 'char' fmt_scaled.c:111: warning: array subscript has type 'char' fmt_scaled.c:155: warning: array subscript has type 'char'
2015 Nov 22
2
Re: installation error
Thank you, The apt was set to look in the wheezy instead of the jessie one. > On 22 Nov 2015, at 13:30, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 05:12:19AM +0200, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to install libguestfs on a proxmox (debian jessie with some custom packages) and when I run make at a certain
2012 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] problem trying to write an LLVM register-allocation pass
I have a new problem: Register RBP is used in a function foo. (I am not allocating RBP to any virtual register, the instances of RBP in function foo are in the machine code when my register allocator starts.) Function foo calls function bar. Register RBP is not saved across the call, though it is live after the call. Function bar includes a virtual register. The code that I'm using to