similar to: trying to resurrect discussion about "Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9)"

> At one point, I had wondered about separating out the client and server > support as well. At first glance, that would seem to help move things > forward and would address most of the reported use cases. However, I > have some users who would need the client support as well. > > I suspect that adding the server support first might be a problem for > the developers. Such a

Hi, >>> It would be nice to know what the precise technical issues are that have >>> prevented support for this from being added. From what I recall, it >>> seemed like the delay was largely due to details of the client >>> behaviour, and possibly some feature creep. It would indeed be really great to have some details on this point. Concerning the test of

FWIW, now that privsep is mandatory I have no objection to including signal support in sshd. On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Yonathan Bleyfuesz wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose some ideas to revivify this subject. > > -First, we could add support on the client to send signal thanks to the escape characters. > (code :

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2360 --- Comment #38 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.9 -- You are receiving this

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2130 --- Comment #28 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to openssh-6.4 -- You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2188 --- Comment #30 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs / feature requests

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2226 --- Comment #32 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.7 release, since 6.6 was mostly

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2266 --- Comment #34 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs to 6.8 release. --

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imorgan at nas.nasa.gov --- Comment #36 from Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> --- Created attachment

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2266 | --- Comment #37 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- OpenSSH 6.8 is approaching release and closed for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2360 |2403 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2443 --- Comment #39 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget pending bugs to openssh-7.1 -- You

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2403 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2451 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 [Bug 2451] Bugs intended to be fixed in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2443 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2443 [Bug 2443] Bugs intended to be fixed for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2451 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 [Bug 2451] Bugs intended to be fixed in 7.2 --

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 mikeh <randomfoox at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randomfoox at gmail.com --- Comment #40 from mikeh <randomfoox at gmail.com> --- The OpenSSH 7.4 release notes

This may be more relevant to an IETF mailing list but I figured I'd start here first. I ran across this because signals need to be sent as explicit commands, not as special characters, when using EXTPROC. So I started implementing the "signal" channel request. However, the description of the request is inadequate. RFC4254 section 6.9 says the 'signal name' values are the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Summary: Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:42:15 +0100 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote: > Il giorno sab 26 gen 2019, 13:20 Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi@redhat.com> > ha scritto: > > > Allow multiple alternative directory names for distributions (or > > distribution familiy) when installing Linux guest tools packages. > > Original naming required that there is a