similar to: Server accepts key: pkalg rsa-sha2-512 vs ssh-rsa

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2680 Bug ID: 2680 Summary: Regression in server-sig-algs offer in 7.4p1 (Deprecation of SHA1 is not being enforced) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:46, Phil Pennock <phil.pennock at globnix.org> wrote: [...] > ssh_config(5) describes for `HostKeyAlgorithms` that: > } The list of available key types may also be obtained using "ssh -Q key" > > Running `ssh -Q key`, the output does not include these proposed > replacements. > > Only in sshd_config(5): > rsa-sha2-512-cert-v01 at

Hello, as a follow-up on my mail some time last month where we were facing weird issues when authenticating to new OpenSSH servers, I went down the road to investigate what is really going on there and I found out that even though all the logs in client and server happily say that the SHA2 extension is used, under the hood there is just SHA1. This is because the different agents are ignoring the

With the upcoming deprecation of ssh-rsa I was trying to see what keys my version of OpenSSH ( 7.8p1 ) supports. I noticed that "ssh -Q key" does not actually list the suggested algorithms to transition to ( rsa-sha2-256 and rsa-sha2-512 ) even though they are supported. Looking through the code, it looks like an issue with the arguments passed to sshkey_alg_list in ssh.c where it should

Hi, One of our users who is running an OS (I think it's the latest beta macOS 10.14.1) with ssh version "OpenSSH_7.8p1, LibreSSL 2.7.3" is unable to use our user SSH RSA certificates to authenticate to our servers (which are running "OpenSSH_7.4p1, OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017"). We see this error on the client side: debug1: kex_input_ext_info:

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:13 PM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Could you try this? > > > > diff --git a/sshconnect2.c b/sshconnect2.c > > index f104408..1d2906f 100644 > > --- a/sshconnect2.c > > +++ b/sshconnect2.c > > @@ -1080,7 +1080,8 @@ key_sig_algorithm(struct ssh *ssh, const

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:41 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > > We see this error on the client side: > > > > debug1: kex_input_ext_info: server-sig-algs=<rsa-sha2-256,rsa-sha2-512> > > ... > > debug1: Offering public key: RSA-CERT SHA256:xxx /path/to/key > > debug1: send_pubkey_test: no

On 2020-02-06 at 13:28 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > Like this. > --- a/sshd_config.5 > +++ b/sshd_config.5 The ssh_config.5 also has a copy of this and presumably needs the same change, unless I've misunderstood. -Phil

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Damien Miller wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > > > Thanks for looking into. I wasn't able to get the patch to apply > > cleanly to the portable source for whatever reason, so I manually made > > the changes and got a little further. I now get past the "no mutual > > signature algorithm" client message, and get

$ ssh -Q HostKeyAlgorithms Unsupported query "HostKeyAlgorithms" $ ssh -V OpenSSH_7.4p1, OpenSSL 1.0.2u 20 Dec 2019 On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:24 PM Christian Hesse <list at eworm.de> wrote: > Luveh Keraph <1.41421 at gmail.com> on Mon, 2020/03/02 14:07: > > When I do ssh -Q key, where ssh is the OpenSSH 7.4p1 client, I get the > > following output: > >

Hi, Following the fix [1] being released on 7.5, now SHA2 RSA signature methods work properly. On the other hand it is still not possible to disable SHA1 RSA alone (as an example, as SHA2-256 or SHA2-512 could also potentially be not desirable), where it is considered insecure or undesirable. I am proposing to add a mechanism, and happy to submit a patch, to enable selection of the Hashes

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2746 Bug ID: 2746 Summary: RFE: Allow to disable SHA1 signatures for RSA Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On 2020-02-05 at 20:39 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2020-02-06 at 10:29 +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > OpenSSH 8.2p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing > > on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a feature release. > > > * The RFC8332 RSA SHA-2 signature algorithms rsa-sha2-256/512. These > This actually affects me:

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: > [...] >> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x >> >> OpenSSH_7.3p1-hpn14v11, OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 > > this is a third-party modified version of OpenSSH. Can you reproduce > the problem with a stock OpenSSH from the source from

Hi, OpenSSH 8.2p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a feature release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the instructions at

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 06:12, Christian Weisgerber <naddy at mips.inka.de> wrote > On 2020-06-01, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > > > With the upcoming deprecation of ssh-rsa I was trying to see what keys my > > version of OpenSSH ( 7.8p1 ) supports. I noticed that "ssh -Q key" does not > > actually list the suggested algorithms to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2568 Bug ID: 2568 Summary: ssh fails to authenticate using RSA keys when agent does not support sha256/512 signatures Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other URL: https://github.com/connectbot/connectbot/issues/397 OS: Linux

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2650 Bug ID: 2650 Summary: UpdateHostKeys ignores RSA keys if HostKeyAlgorithms=rsa-sha2-256 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh

On 23/04/2018 11:49, Michael Felt wrote: > On 21/04/2018 16:21, Michael Felt wrote: > > > Question: I have not dug into the tests yet. Will copy to a "local" > directory, and not build out of tree and see if that fixes it (as it > does for many other packages). However, just in case it does not - how > can I fast-forward the tests to the "agent" tests?

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: >> Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: >>> [...] >>>> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x >>>> >>>>