similar to: how is the sha fingerprint generated?

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches similar to: "how is the sha fingerprint generated?"

2015 Jun 30
2
how is the sha fingerprint generated?
You really don't need openssl for that. And the fingerprints are simple. Here is a python script that do the same as ssh-keygen -fl /path/to/key : #!/usr/bin/env python3 import binascii import hashlib import sys if __name__ == "__main__": key = binascii.a2b_base64(sys.argv[1]) if sys.argv[2] == "md5": m = hashlib.new("md5")
2017 Jan 06
2
[PATCH] Set KRB5PRINCIPAL in user environment
Hey, On 05/01, Jakub Jelen wrote: >On 01/04/2017 10:57 AM, Johannes L?thberg wrote: >>Signed-off-by: Johannes L?thberg <johannes at kyriasis.com> >>--- >> gss-serv-krb5.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >>diff --git a/gss-serv-krb5.c b/gss-serv-krb5.c >>index 795992d9..a12bb244 100644 >>--- a/gss-serv-krb5.c >>+++
2014 Dec 28
2
pubkey fingerprint and krb princ name in environment
Hey, I use gitolite for git hosting on my server, and because I want to use kerberos authentication I patched OpenSSH to put the name of the kerberos principal name or the ssh fingerprint as environment variables so my ForceCommand script can use them to actually authorize the user by the principal/fingerprint. It?s a bit annoying to keep my own patch and I thought it might be something
2015 Mar 26
3
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
On 26/03, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >Yanking it out wholesale should be part of a 7.0 build, not an >incremental release. That's a major incompatibility with one heck of a >lot of existing code, much of which is on extended support. > And it?s been said multiple times in this thread that the OpenSSH version number is just a incrementing decimal number, it doesn?t have any major
2017 Jan 04
2
[PATCH] Set KRB5PRINCIPAL in user environment
Signed-off-by: Johannes L?thberg <johannes at kyriasis.com> --- gss-serv-krb5.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/gss-serv-krb5.c b/gss-serv-krb5.c index 795992d9..a12bb244 100644 --- a/gss-serv-krb5.c +++ b/gss-serv-krb5.c @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ ssh_gssapi_krb5_userok(ssh_gssapi_client *client, char *name) } else retval = 0; +#ifdef USE_PAM + if
2015 Mar 25
3
FYI: SSH1 now disabled at compile-time by default
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 18:48 +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > Our ability to influence people who run truly obsolete software is > extremely limited. +1, mostly because those who still use something that outdated in their products are either dead, or simply don't care about their customer's security (which is typical in the embedded devices area). Just by us (or anyone else) saying
2010 Aug 02
1
wrong facts going into storeconfigs, 0.25+2.6
I''m re-posting this because I''m not sure that it got through the first time. If someone could at least echo back that this is reaching the list, I''d appreciate it. (I''m new to the list.) Sometimes (with variable frequency) storeconfigs stores the wrong data in the fact_values table. This has the end result that exported resources, when collected, have
2016 Sep 20
5
Domain Member Server: Domain Users cannot access shares
Hello to the Samba devs and mailing list subscribers, I've run into a bit of trouble getting a new domain member server setup. I've got three Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit VMs running the latest stable build of Samba built from source acting as Domain Controllers. I've got a fourth physical machine running Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit running the canonical distribution samba (Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu)
2018 Mar 16
2
[PATCH] Set KRB5PRINCIPAL in user environment
Hello There is no reply about this demand since the firt proposition has if nobody in dev team cares about it :( Strange ... Le 14 mars 2018 20:39:53 GMT+01:00, "Johannes L?thberg" <johannes at kyriasis.com> a ?crit : >Quoting Johannes L?thberg (2017-01-06 02:34:43) >> >this change request is already tracked as a bug #2063 [1] (with the >> >related
2016 Sep 21
0
Domain Member Server: Domain Users cannot access shares
So it seems that I have identified the source of all of my permissions issues, though I'm unclear as to exactly why these problems have occurred and would love an explanation if anyone can offer one. I was using mdadm to create a RAID 1 array, formatting it ext4 and storing all of the data that samba was serving on /dev/md0. The two drives that make up the array are hosted by an LSI MegaRaid