similar to: Weak DH primes and openssh

> Can this be addressed in ssh_config/sshd_config with the KexAlgorithms setting? weakdh.org/sysadmin.html recommends adding: KexAlgorithms curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org But this thread makes it sound as if it's not necessary. Can anyone confirm? Personally I'm on openssh-6.7. - Grant > You will be aware of https://weakdh.org/ by now, I presume; the take-home seems to be

Greetings, Given the weakness with Diffie-Hellman modp groups less than 2048, is it time to bump the suggested 1024 bit minimum value from the RFC 4419 to a more current 2048 value for OpenSSH 7.0? If so, should this be just a compile-time change, or should there be a new client and server runtime option? Thanks, -- Mark

On 09/24/2017 12:21 AM, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > I suggest you upgrade to a more recent edition of the OpenSSH software. > The most recent release is OpenSSH 7.5 and OpenSSH 7.6 will be released > very soon. This problem is in v7.5 and v7.6. See dh.c:436. > OpenSSH 6.6 was first released on October 6, 2014. I brought up v6.6 to give an example that older clients wouldn't be

A few questions regarding the OpenSSH support for the Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithms: (1) Are the diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256", "diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1" , "diffie-hellman-group14-sha1" "diffie-hellman-group1-sha1" (as defined in RFCs 4253 and RFC 4419) the complete list of key exchange algorithms supported by OpenSSH? (2) Is there a

After upgrading a Linux system from OpenSSH 6.7 to 6.9, Cisco switches/routers can no longer scp config files to/from the system. The last debug entry before the Cisco device closes the connection is "debug1: server_input_channel_open: confirm session". The next line is "Connection closed by x.x.x.x". Anyone else seen this or know of a fix? The Cisco device gives

On Fri 2015-05-22 00:06:29 -0400, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Matthew Vernon <matthew at debian.org> wrote: >> >> You will be aware of https://weakdh.org/ by now, I presume; the >> take-home seems to be that 1024-bit DH primes might well be too weak. >> I'm wondering what (if anything!) you propose to do about this issue, >>

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:27:01, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > Note that PuTTY does do Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange, but until very > recently (ie after their 0.64 release) they didn't do the one that was > actually standardized in RFC4419. OpenSSH recently removed support for > that non-standard one and as a result we don't offer DHGEX to PuTTY >

Hi, In a recent security review some systems I manage were flagged due to supporting "weak" ciphers, specifically the ones listed below. So first question is are people generally modifying the list of ciphers supported by the ssh client and sshd? On CentOS 6 currently it looks like if I remove all the ciphers they are concerned about then I am left with Ciphers

Also, how are default moduli shipped with OpenSSH for use in diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1/sha256 chosen? Are they chosen randomly by developers or are they chosen for security properties? If they are random, why not use moduli from RFC 7919 instead, like Mozilla recommends? On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:48 AM Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote: > > Yegor Ievlev <koops1997

Hi, I'm interested in requiring a minimum of 3072-bit DH moduli when using the "diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256" kex, so I edited my /etc/ssh/moduli file such that only 3071+ moduli are left. However, when clients ask for a max of 2048-bit moduli, they actually get one (!). I poked around and found that a fallback mechanism exists (dh.c:185), which returns back the

On 09/22/2017 06:55 PM, Tim Broberg wrote: > Do I understand correctly, that you find the security of group 14 unacceptable and yet you left it enabled? In the end, I'm trying to ensure a minimum equivalent of 128-bits of security. Group14 is 2048-bits, which roughly translates to 112-bits. [1] To this end, I disabled the "diffie-hellman-group14-sha1" and

On 09/22/2017 03:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2017-09-21 18:12:44 -0400, Joseph S Testa II wrote: >> I gotta say... having a fallback mechanism here seems pretty >> strange. The entire point of the group exchange is to use a dynamic >> group and not a static one. > > fwiw, i think dynamic groups for DHE key exchange is intrinsically > problematic

I'm not sure if collision resistance is required for DH key derivation, but generally, SHA-1 is on its way out. If it's possible (if there's not a very large percentage of servers that do not support anything newer), it should be disabled.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2302 Bug ID: 2302 Summary: ssh (and sshd) should not fall back to deselected KEX algos Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P5 Component: ssh

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2302 Bug ID: 2302 Summary: ssh (and sshd) should not fall back to deselected KEX algos Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P5 Component: ssh

On 25 September 2017 at 02:32, Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote: > [+CC Loganaden Velvindron <logan at hackers.mu>] primary author of > the RFC 4419 refresh draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lvelvindron-curdle-dh-group-exchange/ ? Tangent: has any consideration been given to increasing the maximum allowed beyond 8192 bits (which is below the current NIST

List, good afternoon, I was reading up on a TLS Diffie Hellman protocol weakness described here https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html which is similar to the earlier FREAK attack, and can result in downgrade of cipher suites. Part of the solution workaround that the researchers describe for Dovecot here https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html includes altering DH parameters length to 2048, and

On 25.01.24 14:09, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > I am running the below servers on Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.7 > How do I enable strong KexAlgorithms, Ciphers and MACs On RHEL 8, you need to be aware that there are "crypto policies" modifying sshd's behaviour, and it would likely be the *preferred* method to inject your intended config changes *there* (unless they

Il giorno gio 22 nov 2018 alle ore 21:24 Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> ha scritto: > > On 2018/11/22 19:55, owl700 at gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, I have compatibility issues with the latest version of > > openssh-server and an old dropbear client, the dopbear client stops at > > preauth > > > > ov 22 14:34:03 myhostname sshd[3905]: debug1: Client

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: > [...] >> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x >> >> OpenSSH_7.3p1-hpn14v11, OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 > > this is a third-party modified version of OpenSSH. Can you reproduce > the problem with a stock OpenSSH from the source from