Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Re-install libwrap in OpenSSH"
2015 May 20
5
Re-install libwrap in OpenSSH
On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:46:57 +0200
Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > it is pretty obvious
>
> I guess you're not only not subscribed to the development list, but
> you seem to also not have looked at the list archives.
>
> You can only seem like a troll if you act as if you know best but
> in fact you are wrong.
2015 May 20
2
Re-install libwrap in OpenSSH
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Michael Stone <mstone at mathom.us> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
>> Show me this as an example of your firewall skills and replace this
>> hosts.allow entry:
>>
>> sshd: .... : spawn (echo -e "%u@%h[%a] on `/bin/date`" to %d connected
>> me |
>>
2002 Jan 18
1
[patch] openssh 3.0.2p1: Libwrap gets linked in unnecessarily
Hello,
There is a small but annoying problem with linking libwrap in openssh.
The library is added to LIBS which makes it be linked in to all binaries.
This is unnecessary and leads to bogus dependencies if libwrap is a shared
library.
Following is a trivial fix that reserves a separate autoconf substitution
variable LIBWRAP, which is only used for sshd. Please apply.
Maciej
--
+
2008 Sep 03
1
ACLs, binding to an interface, and libwrap
All,
There was some discussion recently on Ubuntu Launchpad regarding the
bug in NUT 2.2.1 where it was not possible to connect with an accept-
all ACL:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235653
The package was patched for the upcoming Ubuntu release (intrepid),
but the discussion drifted to the merits of application-level ACLs
(comment 11 and beyond).
Steve Langasek brings up a good point
2004 Oct 29
2
Logging and libwrap
Hi,
A few things regarding logging and libwrap..
a) PAM_RHOST patch
Back in July, dean gaudet helpfully posted a patch to dovecot PAM_RHOST the
remote IP. Is this going to be included in the main dovecot tree? It
seems like a worthwhile addition. The more informative and concise the
logging the better.
See http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2004-July/004011.html for the original
message.
2007 Nov 14
1
libwrap-ing IMAP and POP logins
Since I've been using this for maybe a year now, maybe someone else is interested in restricting IMAP and POP logins via libwrap.
In addition to the attached patch (against 1.0.5) to src/login-common/main.c, src/{imap,pop3}-login/Makefile.in have to be modified to link against libwrap.
Of course, the option needs to be integrated into configure in the long run.
-------------- next part
2005 Jan 06
2
Feature-request: ip based access control (libwrap)
Is there plans to use libwrap
Or is there already some kind of access control i have missed??
What i really want is a mechanism so i can say:
If The request comes from "123.121.212.0" dont offer ssl and accept plain
else demand ssl and no plain
I now have this (almost) in another imap server by xinetd and two ip addresses.
I could solve this by iptables or access list on the router
2001 Nov 14
5
X11 forwards and libwrap support
Hi!
Is there any reason why support for the libwrap code isn't included
in the X11 forwarding code? I'd like to restrict access to that
port.
How many applications would break if the tcp port
would be closed and only the unix-domain socket would be available?
It's true that x11 forwardings can be considered as a security
risk and they are disabled because of that by default.
I
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
I have compiled dovecot2 for FreeBSD with the tcpwrap option.
A tcpwrap binary gets built and resides in the FreeBSD directory
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot
an examination of the compiled options (using the FreeBSD pkg install
dovecot2) confirms: LIBWRAP : on
yet, when I adjust dovecot.conf with: login_access_sockets = tcpwrap
I get the following logged error message:
20161229 17:02:49
2016 Dec 30
1
FreeBSD / dovecot 2.2.27 / libwrap
It works !
It was THAT easy !
Can you suggest how to replace the hair I pulled out ? :-)
On 2016-12-29 5:27 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> login_access_sockets = tcpwrap
>
> service tcpwrap {
> unix_listener login/tcpwrap {
> group = $default_login_user
> mode = 0600
> user = $default_login_user
> }
> }
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at
2007 Mar 24
0
configure/makefile cleanup: remove LIBSELINUX, LIBWRAP and LIBPAM
Hi all.
Now that we have SSHDLIBS for the libraries required by sshd only, it's
possible to remove some of the single-purpose variables from Makefile.
If this is worth doing, the next step would probably be to move the
OpenSSL libs into CRYPTOLIBS since binaries such as scp and sftp don't
need to be linked with libcrypto.
Index: Makefile.in
2008 Nov 07
6
Cannot get the libwrap patch work
Hello there,
I have been trying to make the patch work for libwrap(TCP
Wrappers) posted on http://dovecot.org/patches
<http://dovecot.org/patches%20Patch%20of%201.1> Patch of 1.1 but could not
get it work. Any help will be highly appreciated. After compiling and
running it I get error "Error: login_tcp_wrappers can't be used because
Dovecot wasn't built with
2010 Mar 07
1
2.0 beta 3 w/o libwrap?
I'm trying to kickstart 2.0b3 on my NetBSD system (where 1.2.x works
great!), and keep hitting:
Fatal: service(tcpwrap)
access(/software/dovecot-2.0beta3/libexec/dovecot/tcpwrap) failed: No
such file or directory
Indeed, that file doesn't exist...but I don't have nor want libwrap. It
appears that doveconf includes tcpwrap...
service tcpwrap {
chroot =
client_limit = 1
2016 Mar 13
3
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000
James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > zfs set sync=disabled ?
>
> Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you shouldn't host email
services anyway.
--
Regards,
Stephan
2016 Mar 13
2
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:
> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000
> > James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >>
> >> > zfs set sync=disabled ?
> >>
>
2017 Aug 20
3
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time
> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400
> KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
>>> Joseph
2002 Oct 08
1
openssh-3.4p1 install problems on Solaris 6 with openssl-0.9.6g
All,
I have successfully compiled and installed openssl 0.9.6g and am
attempting to install openssh-3.4p1.
I am using the following cofigure command for openssh:
./configure --prefix=/opt/local --sysconfdir=/opt/local/etc/ssh
--with-tcp-wrappers --with-ssl-dir=/opt/local --with-rand-helper
The configuration appears to work flawlessly. However, when I try to
make the package I get the
2013 Apr 08
5
How to see folders/subfolders/emails through imap
Hello all,
I am trying to do something very simple - at least thats what I thought.
I have some fs, it contains folders and subfolders with email files ordered
like maildir. Now I try to set up dovecot on top simply to let some imap
account watch these email files. But I cannot see any folders at all. I can
create new folders and see them, but I cannot create subfolders as subdirs
like
2000 Aug 06
1
openssh-2.1.1p4 + libwrap problem
Hi all,
I've hit a problem with OpenSSH 2.1.1p4 and TCP Wrappers, and have noticed
others may also have seen the problem. When OpenSSH is compiled with wrapper
support, access using standard userid/password fails - authentication works
ok and a shell is gained and then immediately terminated.
Running client in debug mode shows no obvious errors, and debug output from
syslog also reveals
2011 May 24
0
libwrap does it work on in 2.0?
Hi,
I noticed recently that libwrap (TCP Wrappers) is supported,
although disabled by default, in the current Dovecot 2.0 but doesn't
seem to be mentioned anywhere on the wiki. Is this working well/at
all? Anyone care with experience using this care to share their
experiences? My OS is FreeBSD, I noticed on some Linux distributions
there may be issues, but this won't affect