similar to: How to actively reclaim stack memory

On 15 Dec 2016, at 07:26, haifeng.qin at wellintech.com via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > For help: > > for loop lead to stack overflow, want to actively reclaim stack memory of alloc instruction. > > How to actively reclaim stack memory ? This sounds as if you’re putting the alloca inside the loop, not in the entry basic block and reusing it. If you

LLVM3.8 version. https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=24233. The example can catch exception. But I use my own code for testing, CustomEHMemoryManager allocated memory address is very large, allocateCodeSection, allocateDataSection assigned address (more than 32 bit address space) is getting smaller and smaller. Cause registerEHFrames to fail. 3.9.1 or 4.0.0 version has been supported on win

For help: Llvm generated instruction calls a function (extern), the function will have a SEH exception (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION), But JIT can not capture the exception of the EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. I saw Bug 24233. EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION exception cannot be captured after modification. How to catch EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION exceptions on win64 ? haifeng.qin at wellintech.com

A following question about how to install "poolalloc". I checked out poolalloc from svn. But I had a problem of installing it. When I tried to run "configure" with options "--with-llvmsrc" and "--with--llvmobj" pointing to where the source of my llvm and objs dir are (/home/usr/Tools/llvm, e.g.), "configure" complained error message

I can say that it does not for me,running x86_64, I have been generating errors for submission by testing on a number of gnu utilities starting with binutils. Patrick On Aug 31, 2007, at 6:11 PM, "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd at gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I am curious about if the current LLVM implementation can handle Linux kernel (or any particular version of Linux kernel). The

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Patrick Flannery wrote: > I can say that it does not for me,running x86_64, I have been generating > errors for submission by testing on a number of gnu utilities starting > with binutils. If you run into problems, please file bugs. -Chris > On Aug 31, 2007, at 6:11 PM, "Haifeng He" <hehaifeng2nd at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I

hi, all: i want to add a function in xen. in the function i need to call the "printk" to display the values of some variables. i found the definition of printk() in file "xen-3.1.0-src\xen\include\xen\lib.h ": extern void printk(const char *format, ...) __attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2))); who can tell me the location of printk()? thanks in advance. 2008-04-26

On 2015/6/4 9:13, Rusty Russell wrote: > Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin at huawei.com> writes: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a newbie and have a question about vring_new_virtqueue function. >> >> Why we set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when no callbacks? >> I think we should set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT even if no callbacks. >

On 2015/6/4 9:13, Rusty Russell wrote: > Linhaifeng <haifeng.lin at huawei.com> writes: >> Hi, >> >> I'm a newbie and have a question about vring_new_virtqueue function. >> >> Why we set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when no callbacks? >> I think we should set avail->flags to VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT even if no callbacks. >

dear all I got this error when I try to use libspeex in visual studio. when I include speex/speex_echo.h, it complains about unresolved external symbol _speex_echo_state_init. And when I include mdf.c into the source, it generates whole bunch of errors. Any idea? thanks so much --------------------Configuration: audio - Win32 Debug-------------------- Compiling... mdf.c C:\Documents and

Hi, all I just downloaded the latest version of llvm. I am interested in the data structure analysis of llvm described in this year PLDI paper, titled "Making Context-Sensitive Points-to Analysis with Heap Cloning Practical For The Real World". However, I could not find any source code that seem to do the analysis. I noticed that in llvm 1.9 release, there is a subdirectory named

okay. I guess I figured it out. It seems "poolalloc" needs to be put in llvm/projects/ directory. Haifeng On 8/23/07, Haifeng He <hehaifeng2nd at gmail.com> wrote: > A following question about how to install "poolalloc". I checked out > poolalloc from svn. But I had a problem of installing it. When I tried to run > "configure" with options

On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:12 PM, Haifeng He wrote: > Hi, all > > I just downloaded the latest version of llvm. I am interested in the > data structure analysis of llvm described in this year PLDI paper, > titled "Making Context-Sensitive Points-to Analysis with Heap Cloning > Practical For The Real World". However, I could not find any source > code that seem to do the

Hi, I was unable to find a bug report for this with a cursory search, but would like clarification if this is intended or unavoidable behaviour: ```{r} # Create example data.frames parents <- data.frame(name=c("Sarah", "Max", "Qin", "Lex"), sex=c("F", "M", "F", "M"),

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

Hi, all I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert-block-profiling", I got error complaining " undefined reference to `llvm_start_block_profiling'. I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory but in the Makefile, it said llvm gcc 4 and above

Hi Haifeng > I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried > to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert- > block-profiling", I got > error complaining " undefined reference to > `llvm_start_block_profiling'. > > I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory > but in the

Haifeng He wrote: > I updated the latest "poolalloc" code and the problem seems to have been fixed. > However, I am still having problem of running "poolalloc". > > After compilation finished, there are several dynamic libraries > created (libpoolalloc_rt.so, libpoolalloc_fl_rt.so and > LLVMDataStructure.so). I was not sure which one I should use so I just

Hi Mats, I think Kevin's point is malloc can return 0, if malloc/free pair is optimized way, the semantic of the original would be changed. On the other hand, malloc/free are special functions, but programmers can still define their own versions by not linking std library, so we must assume malloc/free always have side-effect like other common functions, unless we know we will link std

DSA should be current against head, but poolalloc isn't. I've changed DSA a bit so it may not compile with poolalloc as is. I haven't had time to tackle updating poolalloc (either to head or to the dsa changes). If you want the version from the paper, try checking out llvm 1.8 or 1.9 and a dsa from around then. The dsa as used on the linux kernel and in the OS work is in a branch