similar to: Forward declarations for complete C standard library

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > When implementing a language using LLVM as the backend, it is > necessary to give programs written in that language, access to the C > standard library functions. The Kaleidoscope tutorial shows how to do > this for individual functions using extern declarations, but in > general it would

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Russell Wallace > <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > > When implementing a language using LLVM as the backend, it is > > necessary to give programs written in that language, access to the C > > standard library functions. The Kaleidoscope

When implementing a language using LLVM as the backend, it is necessary to give programs written in that language, access to the C standard library functions. The Kaleidoscope tutorial shows how to do this for individual functions using extern declarations, but in general it would be necessary to have those predefined for the full standard library. Presumably these would contain exactly the

Hello, Everyone I'm using llvm 3.6 DIBuilder module to build the debug information for Chapel language(the Chapel-llvm front end works fine). When I run the test program, I got these assertions failed: !718 Expected no forward declarations! !719 Expected no forward declarations! !720 Expected no forward declarations! !721 Expected no forward declarations! !722 All nodes should be resolved!

Hi, Is it possible to use forward declarations for global variables when emitting llvm IL from C++ ? I.e. if I have a global array, but I can't determine its size until after the llvm IL code which uses it is emitted. thanks Zoltan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hi all, i'm trying to use LLVM to compile some linux kernel code, and i noticed a mismatch with gcc. here is a simplified test case: struct foo { int a; int b; int c; }; static struct foo x; // 'forward' declaration? int bar() { printf("a: %d, b: %d, c: %d\n", x.a, x.b, x.c); } static struct foo x = { .a = 1, .b = 2, .c = 3, }; int main() { bar(); return

%TCDef = type { [16 x ubyte], [16 x ubyte], [16 x ubyte], [16 x ubyte], [64 x ubyte], ushort, %anonymous.5, %anonymous.5, %anonymous.5, uint, uint, uint, ushort, uint, uint, uint, uint } %anonymous.5 = type { ubyte, ubyte, ubyte, ubyte } I have a parser that reads LL files but doesn't handle forward references to structure types. I've been using 1.9 for quite a while and have just now

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index 3eda654..7d039ef 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ #include <linux/virtio_ring.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> -struct vhost_device; - struct

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:41:21 +0800 > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I don't think generic vhost patches should go via my tree. If you disagree, let me know why, thanks :)

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index 3eda654..7d039ef 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ #include <linux/virtio_ring.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> -struct vhost_device; - struct

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:41:21 +0800 > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I don't think generic vhost patches should go via my tree. If you disagree, let me know why, thanks :)

From: haiyangz <haiyangz at hz-dev.msft.interop.novell.com> This patch series cleans up forward declarations and the remaining camel cases in netvsc.c Haiyang Zhang (8): staging: hv: move netvsc_initialize() to clean up forward declaration staging: hv: move netvsc_receive_completion() to clean up forward declaration staging: hv: move netvsc_send_recv_completion() to clean up

From: haiyangz <haiyangz at hz-dev.msft.interop.novell.com> This patch series cleans up forward declarations and the remaining camel cases in netvsc.c Haiyang Zhang (8): staging: hv: move netvsc_initialize() to clean up forward declaration staging: hv: move netvsc_receive_completion() to clean up forward declaration staging: hv: move netvsc_send_recv_completion() to clean up

Hello, I've been using R embedded in PL/R (R procedural language handler for PostgreSQL, http://www.joeconway.com/plr/) very successfully for several months now. A sincere "thank you" goes to the R development team for such a great product. I have a question I'm hoping someone here can help me with. In order to get the required functionality out of PL/R, I've had to

I have no clue, I didn't have time to look into that example yet. How does the IR (before optimization) differ from the other version? Roel On 01/24/2012 04:45 PM, Brent Walker wrote: > Can you explain please why it works for this version of the function: > > double f(double *__restrict__ x, double *__restrict__ y, double > *__restrict__ z); > > What is different here?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8053 Summary: Older C compilers don't allow in-line declarations flist.c:1653 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Peter Cooper wrote: > I think the problem here is that the IR doesn't have any way to attach restrict information to loads/stores/pointers. I think we do now, actually. Now that the loads and stores have TBAA metadata, I think the restrict attribute can go there. It needs to be attached to every use of a restrict pointer, but that's similar to how TBAA already works. > It works

Hi All. I noticed that xcrypt.c now has some variable declarations after code within a block (for some sets of #ifdef's). Won't that choke some compilers? Should it do something like the attached? -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually

Hi Brent, I think this is a problem in the easy-cse transform. In this transform load operations can be replaced by their subexpression, in this case the propagated constant, based on the value of the 'CurrentGeneration' of memory writes. This implies that any store operation invalidates the knowledge about previously stored subexpressions. In general, this is a safe assumption but

So I've just ripped my entire 600 CD collection to flac format (200gigs worth) with vorbis comments in the flac metadata. But my gripe is that neither Winamp nor XMMS's flac plug-ins seem to have the ability to read the vorbis comment from the metadata. Are there any flac players for windoze or linux that can access the metadata? Or do i have to add redundant ID3 tags to all my flac