similar to: LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting"

2016 Oct 31
0
LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting
Historically, we haven't had the social during the dev meeting because there's usually a reception :) On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > I see that LLVM social meeting is planned for upcoming thursday 3.11. > Because it is in the same day as LLVM Dev meeting, would it be more > convenient if it
2016 Oct 31
2
LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting
Stay tuned, George and I are sorting this out. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Historically, we haven't had the social during the dev meeting because > there's usually a reception :) > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > I
2016 Oct 31
0
[cfe-dev] LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting
On 31 October 2016 at 19:49, Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Stay tuned, George and I are sorting this out. Thursday will be the event dinner, but I would welcome a night out on Wednesday or Friday with the LLVM folks. cheers, --renato
2016 Jul 15
3
LLVM Social in Berlin, Germany
Appreciations for the initiative! There are some people in the Berlin C++ user group [1] who may be interested. Also there was an active compiler meetup group [3] a few years ago. As far as I know these guys mostly joined the Strange Group Berlin [2], but may still be interested in a more compiler-focused meetup. For the people cc'd: please let us know who'd like to participate in a LLVM
2016 Nov 28
2
Looking for help with an ast matcher
Hi Piotr, Thanks. Yeah, it seemed a little weird, but it was what got me closest. I found out that the matcher I supplied here was working for clang-query 3.8.1. I'm working on a clang-tidy module for 4.0.0 - it's not working there. Could you elaborate on the "onImplicitObjectArgument"? There is no document on it on the clang page. So I wouldn't know how it works or what it
2016 Sep 02
4
[ThinLTO] Importing based on PGO data
2016-09-02 15:04 GMT-07:00 Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com>: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Piotr Padlewski > <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working right now on importing based on PGO/FDO data. There is one > > issue that I found - when we calculate the list of imports, we can't get > the > > ProfileSummaryInfo,
2016 Sep 02
2
[ThinLTO] Importing based on PGO data
The profile summary is saved in the global metadata ASAIK. If we want to calculate if something is hot/cold while choosing functions for importing, we would either need to read whole Module (which we clearly don't want to do) or duplicate this information in the summary, so we could get it without reading Module. 2016-09-02 15:49 GMT-07:00 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>: >
2016 Nov 28
2
Looking for help with an ast matcher
Hi Piotr, I think I found a working matcher: match ifStmt(hasCondition(implicitCastExpr(hasImplicitDestinationType(isInteger()), has(cxxMemberCallExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("compare"))), hasArgument(0, declRefExpr().bind("str2")), callee(memberExpr(has(declRefExpr().bind("str1"))))))))).bind("case1") This one bind to both str1 and str2 in
2016 Nov 27
2
Looking for help with an ast matcher
Adding cfe-dev, because it is related to clang, not LLVM. 2016-11-27 22:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > Hi Mads, > Can you provide the code that you run clang-query on, or at least AST for > the fragment you want to match? > > Piotr > > 2016-11-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Mads Ravn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >: >
2016 Jul 01
2
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today!
Your are invited to attend the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting <http://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-11/> on November 3-4 in San Jose, CA. Registration will open today, July 1, at 5:00PM PDT. You may register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282 <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2016-llvm-developers-meeting-bay-area-tickets-26043992282>
2017 Apr 03
4
Dereferenceable load semantics & LICM
2017-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > > > 2017-03-31 23:20 GMT+02:00 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> On March 31, 2017 at 1:07:12 PM, Piotr Padlewski >> (piotr.padlewski at gmail.com) wrote: >> > [snip] >> > Do I understand it correctly, that it is legal to
2016 Sep 02
3
[ThinLTO] Importing based on PGO data
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Piotr Padlewski > <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 2016-09-02 15:04 GMT-07:00 Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com>: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Piotr Padlewski > >>
2017 May 08
2
Handling invariant.groups with equality + marking it as experimental
Hi Piotr, On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > Also, Sanjoy proposed to mark invariant.group features as experimental, so > we will not be afraid to break behavior of frontends that already use it. > > Right now I am pretty sure that clang is the only one that curently uses it > (and not by default). Firstly, yes, I think we
2017 Mar 31
4
Dereferenceable load semantics & LICM
Hi Piotr, On March 31, 2017 at 1:07:12 PM, Piotr Padlewski (piotr.padlewski at gmail.com) wrote: > [snip] > Do I understand it correctly, that it is legal to do the hoist because all > of the instructions above %vtable does not throw? Yes, I think you're right.  HeaderMayThrow is a conservative approximation, and the conservativeness is biting us here. > Are there any plans to
2016 Jul 05
2
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today!
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > I'm curious about the requirement to provide birth date—what's that about? Liability reasons because we serve alcohol at the reception. I can change to age if thats better or ask if someone is under 21 but you may still be asked show ID if a server is unsure. -Tanya > Thanks, >
2017 Jan 25
4
RFC: Emitting empty invariant group for vtable loads
Hi Piotr, I think makes sense. Modulo bitcasts, the invariant is identified by a particular pointer SSA value. Given that you can't sensibly have two nonequivalent invariants associated with the same pointer SSA value simultaneously, there's no need to also identify the invariant with a metadata string as well. When we need a new "identifier" for the pointed-to value, we
2016 Sep 02
4
[ThinLTO] Importing based on PGO data
Hi, I am working right now on importing based on PGO/FDO data. There is one issue that I found - when we calculate the list of imports, we can't get the ProfileSummaryInfo, which is the best and I think only valid way of checking if callsite/callee is hot (isHotCount()). There are 2 solutions that I come up with Teresa and Easwaran: 1. Add PGO data to summary 2. Replace
2018 Mar 30
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Devirtualization v2
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 09:39, John McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mar 30, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com <mailto:piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Do you know any other specific situations and metadata that would require, or would be good if would use the same solution? >
2017 Apr 28
2
Return on nocapture pointer
Thanks guys. Do you it make sense to extend the definition in LangRef? If so I will be happy to upload a patch. Piotr 2017-04-28 17:58 GMT+02:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > > > On 04/28/2017 10:22 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > I have a question about semantics of nocapture attribute: > "This indicates that the callee does not make any
2016 Dec 20
0
GDB pretty printers for LLVM ADTs
Dandy :) I looked into ways to do this for the GDB visualizers - but was unable to come up with a totally automated solution, unfortunately. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > The VC visualizers are automatcially installed. > > > 2016-12-20 19:45 GMT+02:00 David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >