similar to: Branch profiling in older llvm revision

Hello. I'm using these commands to compile the code below in order to collect edge/blocks profiling: clang -emit-llvm -c sort.c -o sort.bc opt -insert-edge-profiling sort.bc -o sort_prof.bc clang sort_prof.bc -lprofile_rt -L/llvms/lib -o sort_prof then I run the program and display the profiling information using llvm-prof sort_prof.bc, and the result is:

Hello, See answers below On 31/01/13 00:23, César wrote: > Hello. > > I'm using these commands to compile the code below in order to collect > edge/blocks profiling: > > clang -emit-llvm -c sort.c -o sort.bc > opt -insert-edge-profiling sort.bc -o sort_prof.bc > clang sort_prof.bc -lprofile_rt -L/llvms/lib -o sort_prof > > then I run the program and display the

> It is done. Then, I should copy this version on my image and then boot the image with gem5. The > problem is when I try to run llvm-commands in gem5, they don't work and said : "cannot execute binary file". What does "file" says on the binary? > This means that I couldn't cross-compile the llvm for ARM to work on ARM! Something is broken on your side. I can

Hi, I am trying to optimize some benchmarks using LLVM and run them on gem5 simulator (build for ARM). I am using Sourcery Codebench cross-compiler for ARM on my x-86 machine. My steps up till now have been using the following commands. 1. clang -static -emit-llvm -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=soft -target arm-elf a.cpp -c -integrated-as \

Hi members, I am a LLVM newbee. I am working in path profiling. I got an error message when reading the path profile data I made a sample source named foo.c The command chain to make llvm path profiling as follows: 1. Compile to LLVM Bitcode llvm-gcc –emit-llvm foo.c –c –o foo.bc 2. Insert Path Instruments opt –insert-path-profiling foo.bc –o foo_path.bc 3. Link with profile

Hi all. tl;dr: I would like to add a long x86 instruction which doesn't conform to any existing format that I know; I'm not sure where to start. I am attempting to add an instruction into X86, to be simulated in gem5. I've already added a simple, opcode-only instruction which I can successfully decode and run in gem5, so I am roughly familiar with .td files and how backends are built

Hi Gus, When you say "n byte destination" you mean you want to encode an n byte address as a constant within the instruction? That would mean you couldn't encode an address that comes from a register. ~Craig On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Gus Smith via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all. > > tl;dr: I would like to add a long x86 instruction

Thanks Renato and Giang. I was able to run a simple HelloWorld program on gem5 (in SE mode) by using -target -arm-none-linux-gnueabi as the option during cross compilation. I am trying to cross compile some Computer Vision algorithms, which use OpenCV libraries, and I tried using the same command line options - clang++ *-emit-llvm -static -c -Wall -g -O0 -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=soft

That wasn't the part that confused me. What confused me was what you expected to be encoded into the instruction. Your math indicated that you multiple n by 3 and added 1 to it to get your 13 bytes. So that means you intend to use 4 bytes to store an address in 32 bits which implied to me that you intended to have a fixed address encoded. But what if the address in in a register as would often

Whoops - sorry for the confusion. n would be set in stone beforehand. I basically meant to indicate that we'd either be looking at a 32 bit or 64 bit system, ie 4 byte or 8 byte addresses. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, 1:07 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gus, > > When you say "n byte destination" you mean you want to encode an n byte > address as

>> > It is done. Then, I should copy this version on my image and then boot >> > the image with gem5. The >> > problem is when I try to run llvm-commands in gem5, they don't work and >> > said : "cannot execute binary file". >> What does "file" says on the binary? > when I use commands like : "#arm-linux-gnueabi-clang test.c

Hi All, I'm trying to compile clang+llvm on my desktop with cross-compiler to be able to work with llvm commands in ubuntu-arm image whithin gem5. If anybody has done this before I'd be so thankful to know the exact process and commands. I tried to configure llvm as follows but I couldn't get the arm-arm version correctly. To sum up, I need to cross-compile llvm for ARM to work in

Purpose: I implemented a pass on LLVM backend that changes the output format of *ARM* assembly/binary (e.g add a jump at the end of each basic block to eliminate fall through). By calling: llc -march=arm somefile.bc it generates expected arm assembly/binary that runs properly on arm gnu linux (I use qemu-arm and gem5 to simulate it). Now I want to do the same thing on standard c library, but

i tried with the option encrpted password= yes , security = user in my smb.conf file.. but when i did following on my root prompt #killall -HUP xinetd #service smb restart #smbclient -L localhost so i get the problem session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (bad password name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) i'm not gettin why this is coming. i create the

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info > wrote: > >> > It is done. Then, I should copy this version on my image and then boot > >> > the image with gem5. The > >> > problem is when I try to run llvm-commands in gem5, they don't work > and > >> > said : "cannot execute binary file". >

Great info -- all of this has been incredibly useful. Do you have any links to the documentation from this, or does it just come from your experiential knowledge? FYI, I achieved what I set out to achieve when I wrote this email. I'm moving on to a more complex goal now, but the original question was answered completely, in my opinion. This was the key line: def CACHEOP : I<0x06, RawFrm,

I guess Alexandre will help you prepare this for upstream inclusion, but just want to make sure that my main point makes it across -- this is a 3K line patch. Please try to split it up into patches that add no more than 300 lines at a time, preferably fewer (but this isn't always possible). Ideally each patch should introduce one conceptual unit. Of course different people might draw the line

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Deepak Rawat <deepaksingh.rawat at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I modified the query in res/res_config_odbc.c. > Original: "SELECT MAX(LENGTH(var_val)) FROM %s WHERE filename='%s'" > Modified: "SELECT MAX(LEN(var_val)) FROM %s WHERE filename='%s'" > > I rebuilt the code and installed Asterisk again.

I am testing a resource called venue in this piece of code (generated using script/rspec_resource) ==================== context "Requesting /venues using POST" do controller_name :venues setup do @mock_venue = mock(''Venue'') @mock_venue.stub!(:save).and_return(true) @mock_venue.stub!(:to_param).and_return(1) Venue.stub!(:new).and_return(@mock_venue)

Hi gang, time for my weekly confusion... (I'm trying not to bombard the board with questions) The thing that's on my mind at the moment (there's some backend-stuff that I'm just working my way though) is that I'm not getting very far when trying to get LLVM to profile code - I'm looking for nothing more special than list of how many times each basic block has been called