similar to: [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3

I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > Meant to send this yesterday, but I want to remind everyone that we’re > going to be raising the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 next week. > > If you maintain bots please ensure that your bots are updated by end of > day 5/29 so that we can move on 5/30

All the MIPS buildbots are ready too. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev Sent: 25 May 2016 23:03 To: Chris Bieneman; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 I am ready, regarding to, http://bb.pgr.jp/ On

Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to 2013. The motivating reason is this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is:

I have moved onto the next phase and committed r229185, which makes VS2013 our minimum version. I will revert if issues arise, and we can rinse and repeat as necessary. Once it sticks for a bit I’ll update the docs too. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > I agree with Aaron, this should not be a blocker because the workaround is

Actually forward to LLVM-dev because I obviously don’t know how email works… -Chris > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Chris Bieneman via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [cfe-dev] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 > Date: April 26, 2016 at 3:01:23 PM PDT > To: cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, llvm-dev at lists.apple.com > Cc: Galina

> On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 27 April 2016 at 18:41, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> Renato, in your most recent email you comment about differentiating *stable* vs random versions of CMake built from source. I believe as a community our recommendation should be that people download CMake sources

+Galina, and Takumi This was a very short lived change :-). Looks like we have some bots that need to be updated. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: > Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal

Galina and Takumi, Are we ready to update the minimum required version to 2.8.12.2? -Chris > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > Chandler's feedback was that we should go to 2.8.12.2 instead of 3.0 because of Ubuntu's LTS release. > > -Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova

I don't oppose the subject. I will update cmake within a few days. 2015-02-10 7:17 GMT+09:00 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: > Now, with more Galina and Takumi on the To line. ;-) > > ~Aaron > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> +Galina, and Takumi >> >> This was a very short lived change :-).

I'm with Takumi, and prefer to go on a safe route. Takumi, unless I'm missing something you were checking cmake 3.x with LLVM. How does it look like? Did you discover any problem? Thanks Galina On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > I missed the context. We may stand on 2.8.12.2 at first. > > I will update my cmake from

cmake is a big dependency, but it doesn't seem to have many dependencies itself. They say it's just a C++ compiler and a make (not necessarily gnu). Probably there are one or two more than that :-) A shell, for a start; git or tar/gzip etc. The current *nix source tarball is 6.4 MB gzipped. Just for fun I grabbed it and tried building on four machines: - 3.4 GHz i7 3770 with Ubuntu

Chris, We have upgrade our bots (both internal and external) to CMake 3.5.2. So we are good to go. -Mike On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Renato, > > This approach sounds great to me. > > Chris M let me know separately that GreenDragon is on CMake 3.5. > > I belive Galina and Takumi maintain the

Apple doesn’t ship CMake publicly. Our internal build clusters should all be running 2.8.12.2 or later. Any OS X users not on CMake 2.8.12.2 can always download install packages from CMake.org <http://cmake.org/>. -Chris > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >>>> It

It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. CMake 3.0 is now 6 months old and CMake 3.1 has been released. I would like to propose moving our minimum required CMake version to 3.0. I’ve attached patches to enforce

My list of useful features in newer CMake versions, that I would like to see used: CMake 2.8.10 * INTERFACE_LIBRARY (we already use this by hacking around the CMake version) CMake 2.8.11 * Targets can now have dependencies that are arbitrary files instead of just link dependencies (http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/CMake_target_usage_requirements

I’d like to propose raising the minimum required compiler for the LLVM & Clang trunks for Visual Studio to MSVC 2013. Doing this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is: * Non-static data member initializers * Variadic templates * Initializer lists *

> On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > On 09.02.2015 20:12, Chris Bieneman wrote: >> It came up on another thread that our current minimum required CMake version 2.8.8, has some bugs that cause issues when building with MSVC + Ninja, and one potential solution was to raise the minimum required version of CMake. >> >> CMake

+1 for 2013. The feature set is worth it. I expect that there will still be major incompatibilities around initializer lists, so I would avoid them unless you have MSVC or are OK with diagnosing the problem from a buildbot. On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > I just broke a build by committing initializer list and a few other > C++11

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > +Alex Bradbury > > Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. > > So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the beginning here’s the basic plan: > > 1) Loop in cfe-dev and