similar to: is LLJVM alive?

Hi fellow devs, I was looking for converting LLVM IR to JavaBytecode by using lljvm project of https://github.com/davidar/lljvm They don't seem to compile, once i run *make* in the root directory it give me the error : cd include && make all make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rtiwari1/llvm_new/lljvm/include' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[1]: Leaving

That source file was removed from LLVM in r232397 on March 16, 2015. It looks like lljvm hasn't been updated in a long time. LLVM's C++ APIs are not stable, so there is no expectation that a project built against LLVM's C++ API in 2015 would build or reasonably function against LLVM trunk. The project probably works against LLVM 3.6.2 which was (I believe) the last LLVM release to

Hi, I am begineer to llvm, implementing a main.cpp from https://github.com/davidar/lljvm/blob/master/backend/main.cpp A) : When I am declaring a command: * PassManager PM* * PM.add(new DataLayout td)* It shows error: > *error: missing template arguments before ‘PM’* * PassManager PM;* ^ >*main_test.cpp:48:2: error: ‘PM’ was not declared in this scope* *

Hi Philip, I also tried that including file: #include "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h" but error remain same. Please help. On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 2:58 AM Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ratnesh, > > the PassManager used in that example has moved into the legacy namespace: > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1legacy_1_1PassManager.html > >

Hi, I've written a backend for LLVM that allows LLVM IR to be transformed to a Java/JVM class file (llvm-jvm.patch.gz attached). Indirect function calls don't work yet, and there's probably some minor bugs in it, but it works well for the test cases that I've run through it. Also, several instructions are emulated by method calls due to deficiencies in the JVM instruction set

Hi John, Thank you so much for the valuable answer! :) However, i have one tough issue that i need to solve, in my pass : let's say here %s = add %a, %b I need to check if the value of %a or %b is 2 or 4 and then apply a transformation to the other operand accordingly, for example if the value of %a = 2 the i'll multiply %b by 2 in my transform pass. I'm having a hard time

Hi Dean, thank you for the response! I'm a newbie to LLVM, a student working on an LLVM project so I'm not quite sure of what you're suggesting, please excuse my naivety. To clarify there used to exist this http://llvm.org/releases/1.0/docs/CommandGuide/lli.html where you could type "lli -trace 'filename.bc' and you would get a dump of the dynamic excutiion trace. I

> If you apply that as a patch now, everyone else will have to maintain > it when they do their unrelated changes, increasing the cost of the > project's maintenance. I welcome your code (have been wondering about > it recently too), but I think that you should keep it as a separate > project for now. Once it's at least complete, I'm sure people will be > happy to

hey john, yes indeed, that's what I'm trying, retreiving the values of %a and %b in an LLVM pass, sorry about the confusion. On Apr 24, 2016 7:18 AM, "John Criswell" <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Ammar, > > It is not clear what you are asking. %a and %b in your code below are not > constants; there is no way, at compile time, to determine what

hi everyone, I'm trying to get something like the lli - trace functionality that has been deprecated. I need the same thing that the trace command was doing i. e. the dynamic execution trace, any idea on what it has moved to if it still exists or how to implement it? Best Regards, Ammar Naqvi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> Could you please provide some sort of "feature" test? So, we might be > sure that the stuff won't be broken due to e.g. some API change, etc. > Now we have a powerful FileCheck facility, so, you might just have a > one .ll file and check for the JVM code emitted. Additional patch attached, is this suitable? >> In order to link and run the output, the LLJVM[1]

Hola! I have problems running Rcmd check (windows 98, R1.3.0) It ckoks on an example running a function which calla bringToTop(). This makes an error because Rcmd check runs the examples with the postscript device, and bringToTop does not make sense with that device. Howevere, my function is for interactive use, and needs bringToTop. How can this be used in examples and still have the

Hello, David First of all, thanks for the backend submission. I let Chris comment about the procedure of adding it to the tree. :) I just did a quick look into the code. The comments are below > Indirect function calls don't work yet, and there's probably some > minor bugs in it, but it works well for the test cases that I've run > through it. Could you please provide some

My idea was to create a complete backend treating Java as a normal platform, to enable LLVM to compile programs to Java Bytecode (.class) and Java Archive files (.jar). This could be useful in situations where we need to compile a program for a platform still not natively supported by LLVM. I don't know if it exists already, I've heard about this "LLJVM" but I don't think it

Hi Everyone, I asked a question on the dev list related to the topic to which John Criswell and Jeremy Lakeman kindly provided some valuable insight. I'm still stuck on the issue and i'm hoping i didn't phrase the question well enough. I have a *foo.c* file that is : *#include <stdio.h>* *int foo(int a, int b){* * return a+b;* *}* *int main() {* *int x=foo(3,1); *

Hello! Up to now I have been using hist() to display the distributions. Howevere, I noteiced strange numbers on y (vertical) axis, if I used probability = T or freq = F option. I thought it is a bug and launched the R-bug system and found some posts on that matter. Brian Ripley responded to one, that one should look at truehist() for that. Ok I can use truehist() if I want to see the ratios

Hello Everyone, I need some help in retrieving the numeric value of an instruction operand from LLVM IR. this is what the IR looks like for a simple add function that adds two i32 integers define i32 @summ(i32 %a, i32 %b) #0 { entry: %add = add nsw i32 %b, %a ret i32 %add } i would like to know the integer value of %a and %b. I've tried -i->getOpcodeName() which gives me the

Sir, Given code like: > > X = add int Y, 1 > Z = mul int X, 17 while I iterate over the operands of the first instruction i want to print the variable x ,as well as the constant 1 and while i iterate over the second instruction i want to print variable x and constant 17. what should I do? thanking you, yours sincerely, anubham suresh TU-Darmstadt --- llvmdev-request at

Hi all Have recently watched Matt Jordan's session on Kamailio World 2014 On slides 26-29 of his presentation (http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day1/09-Matt.Jordan-Asterisk12-And-PJSIP.pdf) he speaks about a (completely new, for me at least) approach to build scalable telephony systems, using N instances of Kamailio and N instances of Asterisk Are there any

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Kirill Marchuk <62mkv at mail.ru> wrote: > Hi all > > Have recently watched Matt Jordan's session on Kamailio World 2014 > > On slides 26-29 of his presentation > (http://www.kamailio.org/events/2014-KamailioWorld/day1/09-Matt.Jordan-Asterisk12-And-PJSIP.pdf) > he speaks about a (completely new, for me at least) approach to build