similar to: [Compiler-rt][DFSan] Request to merge a patch to 3.8.1

Approved. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Mohit Bhakkad <mohit.bhakkad at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Request you to approve the merger of this patch to 3.8.1 branch: > > http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262690 > > Thanks, > Mohit > -- -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am trying to build compiler-rt on a x86_64 machine using clang. Command used: CC=clang CXX=clang++ cmake <path to compiler-rt> -DLLVM_CONFIG_PATH=<Path to llvm toolchain>/bin/llvm-config -DCOMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH=<Path to llvm toolchain>/lib/clang/3.7.0 after this command on console it prints, -- Compiler-RT supported architectures: x86_64 Instead if I use gcc in above

Hi R list, I would like to automate, or speed up the process from which I take several separate datasets, stored in .csv formate, import and merge them by a common variable. So far I have greatly sped up the loading process but cannot think of a way to automate the merger of all datasets into a common data.frame. My apologies if this has been covered, any R search suggestions are

I tried running step 5 with clang -fsanitize=dataflow instead of gcc but it gave the following error: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `desc' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC error adding symbols: Bad value clang-5.0: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) So I also tried adding -fPIC option at step 1 when converting .c program

Hi Peter, After discovering several bugs in ArgumentPromotion and DeadArgumentElimination where llvm::Functions were replaced with similar functions (with the same name) to transform their type in some way, I started looking at all calls to llvm::Function::takeName to see if there were any other debug info quality bugs in similar callers. One such caller is the DataFlowSanitizer, and I don't

Hi all, I was trying to compile dfsan with wget. (Just enabling the dfsan feature, without actually making changes to the source code) Without dfsan, I am able to compile and run wget 1.19.5 (available at https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/wget/wget-1.19.5.tar.gz). But when compiled with dfsan, it encountered a null pointer dereference error. Following an old post:

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:04:30AM -0700, David Blaikie wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > After discovering several bugs in ArgumentPromotion and > > DeadArgumentElimination where llvm::Functions were replaced with similar > > functions (with the same name) to transform their type

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:18 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:10 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:04:30AM -0700, David Blaikie wrote:

All, Chris Lattner and I had a recent discussion about merging the HLVM (http://hlvm.org/) and LLVM (http://llvm.org/) projects. We agreed in principle and the merging of the two projects will now commence. This merger makes sense for both projects. LLVM needs to expand into the realm of front end tool kits. HLVM provides LLVM with some initial front-end capabilities. Since HLVM uses LLVM and

Here's a basic patch which would solve it in sort of the same way as the other optimizations I was fixing (just special case the debug info & fix it up). I can work up a test case for this as well, or you can, if you like/this seems reasonable. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:20:55PM -0700, David

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Looks good, thanks! > > Can you write the test case, please? You probably have more experience > writing debug info tests than I do. > Sure - though how would I get the pre-dfsan .ll file to produce this behavior? I've tried compiling to a .ll file without dfsan, then feeling that .ll

On 08/02/2012 11:11 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> A new self-contained `LibCallSimplifier` class will be created. An instance >> of the class will be instantiated when running the `InstCombiner` pass. It's >> folding functionality will be invoked from `InstCombiner::tryOptimizeCall` and >> the implementation will be table-driven like `SimplifyLibCalls`. All of the

Hi, I had downlaoded iaxclient-2.0.2 and complie project *\iaxclient-2.0.2\contrib\win\vs2005* ** It gives many83 fatal and file missing error of file missing Error 1 fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'portaudio.h': No such file or directory d:\mohit\asterisk\iaxclient-2.0.2\iaxclient-2.0.2\lib\portmixer\px_win_wmme\px_win_wmme.c 40 Error 2 fatal error C1083: Cannot open

More top posting goodness... Please post your updated dialplan. After making the change, did you reload/restart Asterisk so the changes would take effect? --Tim ----- "Mohit Saxena" <MohitS at starcomms.com> wrote: > Still no luck.... > > Br, > Mohit > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com >

On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery.com> wrote: >>> An option for enabling/disabling library call simplification in `InstCombiner` >>> will be available. For backwards compatibility perhaps it should remain >>> '-simplify-libcalls'. The `NumSimplified` and `NumAnnotated` statistics shall >>> be added to

I think everyone shares your concerns. But there are no rules that the outcome of this merger must get something bad, so let's see what happens. I hope that it's true what Timo said and that dovecot can evolve and get even better as it is today. Good luck guys! Regards, Adrian. On 23.03.15 15:08, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > I find it extremely interesting that no one has commented on

Has anyone had stability issues with IAX2. (Asterisk 1.0.5). reddwarf*CLI> iax2 show firmware Device Version Size iaxy 22 39344 I'm asking because in the last three weeks I've noticed the following two issues (on separate occasions): 1) Placed a phone call. Asterisk logs show the phone being answered and various files being Played back. But

I find it extremely interesting that no one has commented on the merger of Dovecot Oy and Open-Xchange AG as announced by Timo on the 19th. Is this something that was known a long time ago and I missed? OK checked the on-line archive of the mailing list, no comments there - its not my email set-up - LOL. I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects loosing their

On 23 Mar 2015, at 19:41, Patrick Coffin <patrick at coffininc.com> wrote: > > > To Timo and the Dovecot guys - congratulations! I'm sure this merger with OpenXchange is going to provide you with a lot of resources and opportunities. > > As a longtime user of dovecot, I do have a few concerns. I wonder if you can answer some questions for me. I could probably give

Hi all, I have some questions about "DataFlowSanitizer" from "compiler-rt". I want to know how I can test the "DataFlowSanitizer"? Can I configure it to label only some values, i.e, the return values from specific functions? Also, how can I print these labels? Thanks, Dareen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: