similar to: [LLVMdev] Request: Changing commit message in llvm trunk

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to change a commit message that became malformed when pushing > to trunk > > svn propedit svn:log --revprop -r 243434 >> svn: E175002: DAV request failed; it's possible that the repository's >> pre-revprop-change hook either failed or is

Thanks for all the feedback guys So rather than speculating about what could and might not break. I am going to test all these different scenarios by creating my own svn server, svn mirror and git mirror etc I'll get back to you all with details on what breaks and what doesn't soon with changing the commit msgs Many Thanks Martell On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Sean Silva

I am able to do an svn checkout, but commits fail even before I'm asked for authentication. svn: E175002: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E175002: Server sent unexpected return value (400 Bad Request) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/llvm-project/!svn/act/ef968a87-16e6-4ff1-807a-7f7f88609c97' Is this a server issue? -- HT -------------- next part -------------- An

Hello: I posted this to the subversion list yesterday and have not received a reponse. I am hoping someone on this list will be able to help me. I have a CentOS 5 server running subversion 1.5.6-0.2.el5.rf installed using yum from the rpmforge repository. I am using svnsync to mirror from another repository to the local machine. It is called from a cron job every 5 minutes. After a few days

I'm backing my Ubuntu server up to an HFS+ case-sensitive volume on our iMac using the below rsync command and it hangs at the end. Compiling rsync 3.0.8 by hand with CFLAGS=-g on both systems shows that all rsync processes are in read_timeout(). $ rsync \ --delete-delay \ -P \ -v \ -A \ -X \ --fake-super \ -aH \ --numeric-ids \ --exclude '/dev' \

On 20 Aug 2013, at 10:35, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > Seems to be a known bug in SVN 1.8.0, can you try upgrading to 1.8.1 or downgrading to 1.7? Downgrading to 1.7.x means that I can't access my local repo, since there is no svn downgrade. Upgrading to 1.8.1 gives: svn: E175002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://theraven at

Hi, When I try to use LLVM svn (with svn 1.8.0), I'm currently seeing this: svn: E175004: The PROPFIND response did not include the requested properties Does anyone else have this problem? David

On 20.08.2013, at 11:16, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to use LLVM svn (with svn 1.8.0), I'm currently seeing this: > > svn: E175004: The PROPFIND response did not include the requested properties > > Does anyone else have this problem? Seems to be a known bug in SVN 1.8.0, can you try upgrading to 1.8.1 or

I'm just getting started changing the emitted code. Suppose I want to just add one new instruction to the function prologue at the top. Where would I do this? Does it depend on the backend? I'm targeting RISCV64. Gry

Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> It could be very useful for 3 reason. > This will surely break git mirrors. Sounds like the git mirror's problem.

I'm trying to back up our svn repositories, and I found a nice little backup command line bzip's the backup and creates the md5 hash all in one: svnadmin dump --deltas /repo |bzip2 |tee dump.bz2 | md5sum >dump.md5 The problem is I need to split the backups, so this doesn't really work. Is there perhaps another way of piping things to allow for splitting of the backups?

2015-08-29 14:45 GMT+08:00 Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>: > Why are there two ways to compile LLVM? >> make and cmake! >> What's the difference of those two ways? > > > make and cmake are used together not separately. > cmake is a high level generator that creates a makefile for make > > I compile llvm according to this website(

FYI, I've fixed the below error in the log, directly on the server. The "pre-revprop-change" hook is not in place, so "svn propedit / propset" do not work. 2010/8/28 Arnaud Quette > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Aug 28 00:23:05 2010 > New Revision: 2504 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2504 > > Log: > Fix page titles for

2010/10/26 Arjen de Korte > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Tue Oct 26 18:38:23 2010 > New Revision: 2620 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2620 > > Log: > > > Modified: > trunk/drivers/dummy-ups.h > Arjen, since we're using svn logs to generate the ChangeLog, I went on the server to modify this empty log msg with "Fix

Many git commits in the monorepo look like the following: [Tag0][Tag1] Title line Summary: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque mauris neque, porta nec tristique at, sagittis vel nisi. Fusce pharetra nunc et mauris consequat venenatis. Reviewers: username0, username1 Reviewed By: username0 Subscribers: username2, username3,

I also find the "Reviewed by" tag useful (as well as the review link), for the same reasons. In fact, I don't even use arcanist to push commits, so I do it all by hand, and only include the "Reviewed by" and "Differential Revision" tags. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:55, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't think

On 2020-04-30, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: >For the tools (which I know is mostly what James works on) I’d say new command-line options are worth release-noting as a way to advertise their existence. > >From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of David Blaikie via llvm-dev >Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 11:47 AM >To: James Henderson <jh7370.2008

Can we fix this in reviews.llvm.org's fork of phab? https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/blob/cac3dc4983c3671ba4ec841aac8efac10744a80c/src/applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php Seems straightforward(-ish) to drop the relevant fields there, that way `arc land` automatically DTRT. Jon On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:30 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev

Hi, I''m trying to get up and running with rspec on a new project. I''d like to install the rspec and rspec_on_rails plugins (per http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/install.html), but my corporate firewall blocks port 3690 so I can''t access the repository via svn:// I searched the docs and the mailing-list archive to figure out how to install the plugins

The limitation with the "Reviewed by" line is that if you just use `arc` it indicates who was added as reviewer on the revision, but not who approved it. Because of this, I am wary of relying on this line for anything. If you want to know who reviewed a change, better click on the Differential Revision link and go to the source of truth. -- Mehdi On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:44 AM