Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] ConfigStatusScript Confusion"
2015 Jun 22
2
[LLVMdev] How to Obtain a DataLayout Reference Given a Function & F
I’ve been debugging SAFECode source code files, and line 170 in ArrayBoundCheckLocal.cpp has been causing the following compilation error:
In file included from /Users/peterfinn/Desktop/llvm_trunk_2/projects/safecode/lib/ArrayBoundChecks/ArrayBoundCheckLocal.cpp:18:
In file included from
2015 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] Error when i am using command make -j4 command in cygwin to compile safecode
Dear Nikhil,
The lib/PoolAllocate code doesn't compile with LLVM mainline, and you
don't need it for SAFECode. You can remove PoolAllocate from the list
of directories to compile in poolalloc/lib/Makefile.
Also, are you using the code from Peter's Github repository? I think
Peter made this change in his code already.
Regards,
John Criswell
On 7/29/15 11:27 AM, Nikhil Reddy
2008 Apr 15
1
[LLVMdev] Linking to LLVM libs from new project
Hi all,
I have a new sample project set up in my llvm/projects directory, and
I'd eventually like my frontend to generate an LLVM IR tree. To do so,
I believe I need to link to the appropriate LLVM libraries. That's
where I'm stuck.
I can't seem to find any specific documentation that describes how to
set up a new project to link to LLVM libraries.
To get started, I added a
2015 Oct 14
2
Compiling SAFECode poolalloc in cygwin create different libraries compared to linux.
Hi John,
That worked for me. I am using llvm 3.2 only and following
http://safecode.cs.illinois.edu/docs/Install.html
So for I am able to make inside llvm/projects/poolalloc by doing such
cosmetic changes.
Now, when I tried to make inside llvm/projects/safecode, I see another
error.
kpawar at KPAWAR-LT ~/SAFECode/LLVM_SRC/llvm/projects/safecode
$ /usr/bin/clang -cc1 -triple
2015 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Error when i am using command make -j4 command in cygwin to compile safecode
llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build
/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:
In member function ‘virtual bool
llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’:
/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16:
error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member named
2015 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] (no subject)
Hello,
I have tried a lot fix this error but am not able to can you please
find me a solution am trying to compile the SAFECode in Cygwin Environment
to work for windows.
used make -j4 command to make the files in cygwin i have got this error
make[5]: Leaving directory
'/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_OBJ/projects/safecode/tools/clang/include'
/usr/bin/cp: cannot stat
2015 Oct 13
2
Compiling SAFECode poolalloc in cygwin create different libraries compared to linux.
Hi,
On Linux I observed
[root at localhost poolalloc]# find . -name *.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/LLVMDataStructure.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/poolalloc.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/AssistDS.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_fl_rt.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_rt.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/libpa_pre_rt.a
./Release+Asserts/lib/libcount.a
On cygwin I observed
kpawar at KPAWAR-LT
2012 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build
Hi Nicolas,
I finally found the root of the problem. Build was unable to locate
llvm-build because it was looking for it in
path/to/vmkit_src/utils/llvm-build while it was located in
path/to/llvm_src/utils/llvm-build
Actually llvm-build's path is defined by the
path/to/llvm_src/Makefile.rules and looks like this
LLVMBuildTool := $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/utils/llvm-build/llvm-build
however in
2012 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build
Thanks Favios for finding the problem! I have applied a patch to
Makefile.rules, hopefully it now works without you editing some files.
About VMKIT_SRC_ROOT and PROJ_SRC_ROOT, it is fine to have both in the
code. I find it clearer to use VMKIT_SRC_ROOT.
Nicolas
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Foivos S. Zakkak <foivos at zakkak.net>wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I finally found the
2005 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm 'make install' build errors
Reid,
I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !?
Not sure but that would seem logical.
Aaron
2015 Aug 11
3
libfuzzer questions
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Brian Cain via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> First off, thanks -- this is a pretty great library and it feels like I'm
>> learning a lot.
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>> I'm getting some
2005 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Typo in Makefile.rules and suugestion for Makefile.config.in
1) I find typo in Makefile.rules in printvars rule:
- $(Echo) "Preconditions: " '$(Preconditions)'
+ $(Echo) "PreConditions: " '$(PreConditions)'
2) In Makefile.config.in PROJ_SRC_DIR define for LLVM build mode as
PROJ_SRC_DIR := $(subst //,/,$(LLVM_SRC_ROOT)/$(patsubst
$(PROJ_OBJ_ROOT)%,%,$(PROJ_OBJ_DIR)))
and for other project build mode as
PROJ_SRC_DIR
2011 Oct 24
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM build is failed giving Path.inc:714: error: ‘unlink’ was not declared in this scope
Hello All,
I am getting following error on Ubuntu. My gcc is gcc version 4.4.5. Please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions.
In file included from /home/janarbek/Work/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Path.cpp:299:
/home/janarbek/Work/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Path.inc: In member function ‘bool llvm::sys::Path::eraseFromDisk(bool, std::string*) const’:
2015 Dec 02
2
fuzzer crash (but not the good kind)
Kostya,
I think I've found what looks like a reproducible bug in libFuzzer. The
code under test is built with ASan and the first ASan CHECK failure shows
fuzzer in the stack trace. (see below)
One of the factors that may be unique in my testing is that each iteration
can take a very long time to execute (tens or hundreds of seconds).
Let me know if you need more info, I think it
2011 Oct 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM build is failed giving Path.inc:714: error: ‘unlink’ was not declared in this scope
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, janarbek <canarbekmatay at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am getting following error on Ubuntu. My gcc is gcc version 4.4.5. Please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions.
>
> In file included from /home/janarbek/Work/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Path.cpp:299:
> /home/janarbek/Work/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Path.inc: In member
2015 Dec 03
2
fuzzer crash (but not the good kind)
Kostya,
Here's the git repo: https://bitbucket.org/ebadf/fuzzpy
I've only tested it on arm7 and x86_64 linux, I expect there's a good
chance it may not work on other OSs.
If you can build it successfully ("./build.sh", requires clang and clang++
in your path), then you should run the "testemail" case like so:
while true; do ITERS=1000 ./run.sh
2015 Dec 03
2
fuzzer crash (but not the good kind)
Ah, yes -- you need to clone with --recursive.
I will try the workaround though.
On Dec 3, 2015 1:12 PM, "Kostya Serebryany" <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Kostya,
>>
>> Here's the git repo: https://bitbucket.org/ebadf/fuzzpy
>>
>> I've only
2015 Nov 22
2
[cfe-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -rc2 has been tagged
Should I expect the "-openmp" to work for this RC? I got a link error
(only in phase 3?). Maybe the fact that it happened in phase 3 suggests
some hardware malfunction of mine? Or are there tests executed on phase 3
that aren't attempted on earlier phases?
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./test-release.sh -release 3.7.1 -rc 2 -j1 -openmp
-triple armv7l-ubuntu15.10-linux-gnueabihf
...
cd
2013 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] Using 'llvm-build' for out-of-tree projects
Hi LLVM-folks,
is there a way to use the llvm-build tool for out-of-tree projects?
Makefile.rules supposes llvm-build to be located in PROJ_SRC_ROOT and this
does not hold for out-of-tree projects, the same applies to
Makefile.llvmbuild that is searched for in PROJ_OBJ_ROOT. I think
PROJ_SRC_ROOT should be replaced by LLVM_SRC_ROOT and PROJ_OBJ_ROOT should
be replaced by LLVM_OBJ_ROOT, right?
2015 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
On 6/18/15 6:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Long term we don't want to keep the burden of two build systems in
> tree. CMake is turning out to be the build system we want because of
> its multi-platform support, etc and as soon as the CMake system can do
> everything we can do with the autoconf/makefile build I plan on
> turning down the support for that