similar to: [LLVMdev] LNT install

Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. cheers, --renato On 29 January 2015 at 20:13, David

Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I get this error: (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite test-suite nt.py:1185: note: inferred C++ compiler under test as:

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the > instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I > get this error: > > (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox > --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

I''m streaming audio over a WAN that is 1.5Mbit/s. The audio has to go both ways and can be over tcp or udp. The manufacturers recommend udp as it has less overhead but has a higher chance of dropping out. The audio requires 130-200kbit/s in each direction for a combined 260-400kbit/s. I have two transparent bridges on either side of the WAN to do traffic control. I split it so

> And it doesn't match probably because of one of two things (& I forget > which of the two, if either, have been addressed/workaround): > > 1) using cmake instead of configure/make > 2) using git instead of svn > > One or both of these create versions that lnt doesn't understand > (because they don't include the SVN revision number in the clang > version

Hello, I have a fix for Bug17623 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17623) but I am not sure how best to install a regression test. The commands I use to run the test are (approximately) $LLVM/clang -flto -O2 -o BUG.o -c BUG.c $LLVM/llvm-lto -exported-symbol=main -o lto.o BUG.o $LLVM/clang -o bug lto.o ./bug Where the failing behavior is to seg fault and corrected behavior is to run to

Hi there, I've successfully migrated an extremely large Samba3 domain to Samba4. The platforms involved: Samba files (/var/lib/samba) copied from a Debian 6-based Samba3 PDC with an LDAP backend Debian 7 with Samba4 installed from backports, with slapd installed locally (and now disabled). However, a number of things appear to be wrong: dpadmin at samba4-dev0:~$ host -t SRV

Thanks for your help! After I installed the sandbox to /tmp/mysandbox instead of ~/mysandbox, everything starts to work. It still looks weird though. My home folder is not symlinked by the way. Jingyue On Sat Aug 09 2014 at 10:59:49 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 9 August 2014 02:56, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > > I got > >

I''m trying to implement something similar the the diagram in section 9.5.2.1 in the LARTC HOWTO, but must have missed something somewhere :( I''m trying to hack up wondershaper, as it looked like a good place to start.. Here''s where I currently at, but I''ve tried alot of different things, all failing, some worse than others. The end result is to throttle back 126

Hi All. We have a samba server at our location. We are facing out with some issue. User who have the account on the server are able to access "/" root access. I have tried to add an extra line In Home sharing, which is "path = %H", this lined solved my issue, but gave other issue. After implementing this line under Home share, I am not able to open any other user's

I got Python 2.7.3 Sounds right? On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 4:45:01 PM Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > I've never seen this error before. It looks like something to do with > virtualenv. > > What do you get by running `~/mysandbox/bin/python --version`? > > -Yi > > On 8 August 2014 23:48, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com>

Maybe I was too quick here. Does gcc record the incoming edge to a phi? If so, won’t those change when you delete blocks in a non-trivial manner? How are those updated? From: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 7:02 AM To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>>, Hal Finkel

I had assumed you would treat phi nodes differently from other operations in that they don’t need to keep the block alive just to retain the data flow facts but it would be simplest to do that. Thanks Daniel From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 at 10:26 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at

I want to get lnt to use qemu for the execution. In that case, RHOST= is not set. But I change the Arch because I am going to run in cross mode. Then I'm setting RUNUNDER to be a script which runs qemu. In this case it builds timeit-target as a Mips which fails because this is running on x86. ~/mysandbox/bin/lnt runtest nt --sandbox ~/mysandbox --cc /local/llvmpb_a/install/bin/clang

In practice, APT is not faster to build than rdf. The df calculator we use is linear time and quite fast. Updating is also pretty trivial since it's only deletes of dead and unreachable code. So anything it reached can be replaced with undef in most cases. Cd-dce is not slower in GCC than dce On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 8:31 PM David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> wrote: > I think you

Hi, I followed the instructions on http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html, and got stuck on installation Step 4. ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop said running develop error: None and returned error code 1. The lnt binary wasn't installed anywhere. Any clue? Thanks much, Jingyue -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I followed the LNT quickstart guide ( http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html) on my debian machine, and it seems to have a problem running. When I consult test.log, every single test has a section like this # Pretend that the reference output was produced instantaneously. > cp /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/instant.txt > Output/sse.expandfft.out-nat.time >

Thanks for the response. To clarify in your suggestion, llvm-link will combine the modules but not run the optimization pass, that is still delayed until the final binary is built, correct? My use case is apply LTO to roughly program subsets; sacrificing effectiveness to avoid scaling problems and to allow the artifacts to be reused like archives and cached like .o’s. I need to trigger the

I think you can also avoid the RDF computation using a more directed form of control dependence testing such as described in Keshav Pingali and Gianfranco Bilardi. 1997. Optimal control dependence computation and the Roman chariots problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 19, 3 (May 1997), 462-491. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/256167.256217 However one challenge seems to be fixing the SSA graph