similar to: [LLVMdev] About user of bitcast/GEP instruction

----- Original Message ----- > From: "guoqing zhang" <gqzhang81 at gmail.com> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 4:29:16 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] About user of bitcast/GEP instruction > > Hi, > > > In PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp, it seems to rely on the fact that the > only users of bitcast/GEP instruction are lifetime

Hi, If the special handling in the meg2reg pass is to look for lifetime intrinsics, shouldn't it cast to <IntrisicInst> and then use getInstrinsicID to check for lifetime_start and lifetime_end ? The thing that I don't understand is the following piece of code, which finds all the users and cast it to <Instruction> then eraseFromParent(). How can this guarantee that it only

Hi, In PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp, it seems to rely on the fact that the only users of bitcast/GEP instruction are lifetime intrinsics (llvm.lifetime.start/end). I did some searching in llvm/test folder, it seems to be true. However, by reading LLVM IR manual, I don't see any restriction stated on the possible user of bitcast/GEP instruction. So my question is who impose the restriction ?

Dear all, How do I set the UUI informations for outgoing calls and read the UUI information for incoming call in asterisk? Thanks in advance.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100531/ffcceeee/attachment.htm

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503 kj at uue.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kj at uue.org 2003-03-08 02:04 ------- just

Hi there, Is it possible to manage UUI with asterisk and ISDN (T0 Fritz card). Basically, is it possible to send User to User Information using the D-channel, while making a call?

Hello, I've seen that Nuance SIP audio provider supports additional information (parameters and extra headers) in SIP URIs, using the format: sip:user:password@host:port;uri-param1;uri-param2?header1&header2 For example, sip:1234@myserver.com;extra_header=Uui?Uui=Hello Does Asterisk support this format? Is there a way to retrieve the value of these additional headers, and then decide

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 4/9/2018 8:19 PM, Jeehoon Kang via llvm-dev wrote: > > Dear llvm-dev, > > > Hi! We're collecting mis-compilation bugs in gvn and mem2reg since > 3.7.1. Specifically, We're interested in bugs in the following files: > > llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 4/9/2018 8:19 PM, Jeehoon Kang via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Dear llvm-dev, >> >> >> Hi! We're collecting mis-compilation

Dear llvm-dev, Hi! We're collecting mis-compilation bugs in gvn and mem2reg since 3.7.1. Specifically, We're interested in bugs in the following files: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp We checked all reports in the LLVM bugzilla (https://bugs.llvm.org/), so I'd like to ask if you know any such a bug that is not reported in

Hi everyone and Martin I would like to confirm the conversation we had in regard the possible limitation of firmware auto-select feature that’s been released since v5.20. I recall you saying that there were a lot of issues with auto select and later they shipped it into a Json file , it still didn’t solve all the problems, did it? Is it better to explicitly specify the loader and nvram path

On 4/9/2018 8:19 PM, Jeehoon Kang via llvm-dev wrote: > Dear llvm-dev, > > > Hi! We're collecting mis-compilation bugs in gvn and mem2reg since > 3.7.1.  Specifically, We're interested in bugs in the following files: > > llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp > llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp 3.7 was released over two years ago; there have been

Hi Dave, Did that patch of yours ever make it into trunk? I can't seem to find any related checkin for PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp. I've been doing some extra profiling lately and the RewriteSingleStoreAlloca function alone is taking a whopping 63% of execution time. Thanks! Nicolas -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]

Hi, Today I managed to link ioquake3, but generating a binary does not work yet. 1) On OSX, I get: Error: Code generator does not support intrinsic function 'llvm.ppc.altivec.lvsl'! when I do: llc file.bc -march=c -o file.c 2) On Linux X86, llc does not give any problem, but I get this while compiling the generated .c file: error: unknown register name 'S' in

I have a little simple inheritance thing going on: %struct.PDFrame = type { i64, i64, i8* } %struct.PDField = type { %struct.PDFrame, i8 } Is there any difference between bitcasting a pointer to the struct.PDField to struct.PDFrame, or using GEP to get a pointer to the "super" struct? I'm not even sure it's possible to bitcast in this situation, but I imagine it should be. --

Hello all, I've been trying to compile metamail on Centos4.2. But no luck so far. rpmbuild --rebuild metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Installing metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96604 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf mm2.7 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/mm2.7.tar.Z + tar

Is it possible to send CLID NAME on a PRI? The numbers we send out are being received by telco and propagated, but the names we send out are not showing up. Is this a feature in PRI? Do we need to set PRI_NET instead of PRI_CPE? Is this just not possible? Is this a telco config issue? Thanks for your help... I've read voip-info, and various other sources, and search engines, and google...

On Wednesday 24 September 2008 09:35, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Did that patch of yours ever make it into trunk? I can't seem to find any > related checkin for PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp. I've been doing some extra > profiling lately and the RewriteSingleStoreAlloca function alone is taking > a whopping 63% of execution time. I will commit it today along with

Hi, I am new to llvm. I have project in llvm. For that I need SSA form, which is already implemented in llvm. Basically I want to know which pass insert phi and converts it to SSA form in llvm . Regards, Chayan

Hi, polly is run very early and schedules the following passes before it runs: /// @brief Schedule a set of canonicalization passes to prepare for Polly /// /// The set of optimization passes was partially taken/copied from the /// set of default optimization passes in LLVM. It is used to bring the code /// into a canonical form that simplifies the analysis and optimization passes /// of Polly.