similar to: [LLVMdev] Writing a new AA pass

How to I "recode" a factor into a binary data frame according to the factor levels: ### example:start set.seed(20) l <- sample(rep.int(c("locA", "locB", "locC", "locD"), 100), 10, replace=T) # [1] "locD" "locD" "locD" "locD" "locB" "locA" "locA" "locA"

On 07/14/2017 03:00 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Nuno Lopes via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I going through the alias analysis documentation >> (http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html) and noticed the following in the >> definition of PartialAlias: >> " >> The

Thank you all for your replies. So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for PartialAlias is incorrect. Daniel: now you got me wondering about MustAlias. This is what the docs say: "The MustAlias response may only be returned if the two memory objects are *guaranteed to always start at exactly the same location*" This statement is regardless of the access sizes. For

Oh. So it wasn't just the memory location size that was incorrect on those aliasing checks. I took a look at the tests and it appears that the alias call also catches some cases of restrict/noalias attributes, along with the tbaa info. My first idea of constructing an alias call with no Ptr's but valid tbaa info won't catch that at least. I will create a bug report and try and see if

Hello LLVMdev, I’m using LLVM to do static analysis exclusively (without any code generation). To implement this analysis, I’m using multiple address spaces to disambiguate the purpose of the pointed memory. Since address spaces never alias in my model, I set on to implement an alias analysis pass that would exactly provide this information, as I’m seeing a couple of otherwise dead store that

I have multiple Asterisk instances set up in different locations and would like to modify the callerID of inbound calls to identify which instance the call is coming from.? I knew how to do that with the old sip format, but can't seem to figure it out with PJSip. For example: Currently Location A, extension 10 calls Location B, extension 20.? CallerID on Extension 20 displays

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you all for your replies. >>>> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for >>>> PartialAlias is incorrect. >>>>

> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> Thank you all for your replies. >> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for PartialAlias >> is incorrect. >> >> Daniel: now you got me wondering about MustAlias. This is what the docs >> say: >> "The MustAlias response may only be returned if the two memory objects >> are

Yes. I've attached an updated patch that does the following: 1. Fixes the partialalias of globals/arguments 2. Enables partialalias for cases where nothing has been unified to a global/argument 3. Fixes that select was unifying the condition to the other pieces (the condition does not need to be processed :P). This was causing unnecessary aliasing. 4. Adds a regression test to

### example:start v <- sample(rnorm(200), 100, replace=T) k <- rep.int(c("locA", "locB", "locC", "locD"), 25) tapply(v, k, summary) ### example:end ... (hopefully) produces 4 summaries of v according to k group membership. How can I transform the output into a nice table with the croups as columns and the interesting statistics as lines? Thx,

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017, 12:45 PM Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > >On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >>> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >>>> Thank you all for your replies. > >>>> So here seems to be an agreement that the documentation for > >>>> PartialAlias is incorrect. > >>>>

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017, 12:45 PM Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/15/2017 04:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 07/14/2017 04:37 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you all for your replies.

Oh, sorry, i didn't rebase it when i changed the fix, you would have had to apply the first on top of the second. Here is one against HEAD On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Ana Pazos <apazos at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Daniel, your patch does not apply cleanly. Are you on the tip? > > The code I see there is no line if (QueryResult == MayAlias|| QueryResult == PartialAlias)

I'm not exactly thrilled about the size of this diff -- I'll happily break it up into more manageable bits later today, because some of it is test fixes, another bit is a minor bug fix, etc. Important bit (WRT ConstantExpr): moved the loop body from buildGraphFrom into a new function. The body has a few tweaks to call constexprToEdges on all ConstantExprs that we encounter.

Hi, I'm attempting to do some alias analysis & other memory inspection. I've written a pointless AliasAnalysis pass (that says everything must alias) to attempt to verify that my pass is getting picked up & run by opt. I run opt with: opt -load ~/Applications/llvm/lib/MustAA.so -must-aa -aa-eval -debug < trace0.ll I see my pass being initialized, but never being called (I see

Hi Matthew, Did you add your alias analysis pass initializeEverythingMustAliasPass() into llvm::initializeAnalysis(PassRegistry &Registry) {} ? This will initialize it linked into the Analysis library. thanks, chen On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Matthew O'Connor <thegreendragon at

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > On 15 January 2015 at 13:10, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> Yes. >> I've attached an updated patch that does the following: >> >> 1. Fixes the partialalias of globals/arguments >> 2. Enables partialalias for cases where nothing has been unified to

Based on function names and structures, this is some version of GCC :) Any way you can post the entire .ll file? Because it's globalsmodref, it's hard to debug without the other functions, since it goes over all the functions to determine address takenness, etc :) On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chandler, > > We

Hey Daniel, Thanks again for the help. I'm still a bit confused about the interface to the alias analysis. It seems like we are talking about different interfaces. Has it changed from what the documentation says? As far as I can tell, the documentation takes a specific Value*, and no information about which dynamic execution it is talking about. When you say "Right. It's a

Hi all, I want to make all possible combination from dataset below: V1 <- c(0,1,2) V2 <- c(0,1) V3 <- c(0,1) V4 <- c(0,1) V5 <- c(0,1) V6 <- c(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20) V7 <- c(0,1,2,3,4,5,6) V8 <- c(0,1) V9 <- c(0,1) V10 <- c(0,1) V11 <- c(0,1) V12 <- c(0,1) V13 <- c(0,1) V14