similar to: [LLVMdev] FYI to out-of-tree target maintainers: patch requiring attention discussed in llvm-commits

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 29 July 2016 at 17:50, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > While I think the 6-month mark is artificial (what's wrong about a vague > > "several months"? these are policies/guidelines, not legal contracts), > > I'm ok with that, too. > >

Hi Eli, Thanks for the link! I'm able to compile a standalone pass outside of the source tree, and I'm obviously ably to compile analysis groups inside the source tree. However, the problem comes when I try to do what the tutorial suggests to create an analysis group outside of the source tree. My understanding is that building out of tree requires different methods to register the

On 29 July 2016 at 17:50, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > While I think the 6-month mark is artificial (what's wrong about a vague > "several months"? these are policies/guidelines, not legal contracts), I'm ok with that, too. Though, what do you think about the "2 months after all done"? Maybe "at least 2"? Giving a number makes

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 29 July 2016 at 12:16, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> > wrote: > > 1) Leave the wording as is, and make Lanai an official back-end no > earlier > > than Sep 28th. > > I don't want to *have* to do that just because we introduced a policy

If you are responsible for a tool or package for Vorbis, you need to email me offlist ASAP. This means: Chris Cheney Michael Smith Stan Seibert If I've forgotten anyone, you still need to email me :) jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

Hello all, I'm trying to follow the guide http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html to build an some passes and analysis groups out of tree. However, I'm having some trouble with crashes when I try to follow the guide. The first section provides a very useful example of what the whole .cpp file should look like for the HelloWorld pass. Obviously it's a bit more complex to write the

On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>>> On Thu,

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > When someone breaks a FileCheck-based test on some buildbot, sometimes > it may not be obvious *why* did it fail. If the failure can not be > reproduced locally, it can be very hard to fix. > > I propose adding a "very verbose" mode to FileCheck. In this mode >

On 29 July 2016 at 18:01, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > I don't know what the right number should be, to be honest. 2-3 sounds > better than 6, though, given the rate of change of the LLVM codebase. Good, that's the current version: 5. The target must have been stable in the tree and have addressed every other minimum requirement for at least 2-3 months. This

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > This is unfortunate. Last month I tweaked TestingGuide.rst to > discourage grep in favor of FileCheck. It now says: > > "The recommended way to examine output to figure out if the test > passes it using the FileCheck tool. The usage of grep in RUN lines is > discouraged." > >

On Jan 26, 2013, at 9:49 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok,

On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri,

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> >>> Ok, this is done and seems to work. >>> >>> As far as Chris's request for getting "key

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> We have to

On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: >>> We have to options: >>> (a) replace 'FileCheck' with '%FileCheck' in all tests, and teach

Submitters of device tree binding documentation may forget to CC the subsystem maintainer if this is missing. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org --- Please apply this patch directly if you want to be involved in device tree binding documentation for your subsystem. ---