similar to: [LLVMdev] Inconsistent result with CallGraph

Hello: We are developer-engineers of Appentra Solutions. We are working with LLVM-3.1 and we have a problem. We think we have found a bug on CallGraphNode. This is the code we have executed: virtual void getAnalysisUsage( llvm::AnalysisUsage & info ) const { info.addRequired<CallGraph>(); ... } ... virtual bool runOnModule( Module & M ) { ... CallGraph &CG =

I am finding some weird behavior in the CallGraph, and am not sure what am I doing wrong. When trying to traverse nodes in the CallGraph I get stuck in nodes representing external functions. Take the following code: ----- #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf( "Hello World!\n" ); } ----- If I try to traverse the CallGraph using the following code: ----- CallGraph CG

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jianfei Hu <hujianfei258 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I want to traverse CallGraph > > code segment: > > > virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const > { > AU.addRequired<CallGraph>(); > } > > virtual

Hello, I want to traverse CallGraph code segment: virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<CallGraph>(); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &F) { CallGraph &g = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); for ( CallGraph::iterator i = g.begin(); i != g.end(); i++) { errs()<<"-----------------\n";

> Am 04.03.2015 um 20:31 schrieb Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: > > > In the case of HTTP, IMAP, etc. things are not so easy. > > Just think about NAT and CGN > > that don't matter > > if i blacklist a client because he starts a dictionary attack in SMTP i want it also bock on IMAP without use a dozen of different tools because teh via IMAP

Back in 2010 I raised this issue, and there was some discussion, https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-November/058987.html The goal, then, as now is to have a way to produce a bibtex-clean .bib file (i.e., not requiring manual editing except in unusual circumstances) reflecting installed packages for use in writing where one often needs/wants to cite all packages used in a given

Михаил wrote: > It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Ah, then you'll need to update the CallGraph first. Use "CG.removeFunctionFromModule(F);" before deleting it. Nick > Yours sincerely, > Kadysev Mikhail > > 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > >> Михаил wrote: >>> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still

It is ModulePass with AnalysisUsage of CallGraph Yours sincerely, Kadysev Mikhail 22.04.2012, в 5:20, Nick Lewycky написал(а): > Михаил wrote: >> Thanks, but I replaceAllUsesWith() - works well, but I still get bug in >> eraseFromParent(): >> >> While deleting: i32 (%class.B*, i32)* %_ZN1B1xEi >> An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! >>

The follwing is a snippet of code to find some indirect calls in a module, which I learned from TopDownClosure.cpp: void FPS::repairCallGraph(Module &M) { CompleteBUDataStructures &DS = getAnalysis<CompleteBUDataStructures>(); for (Module::iterator f = M.begin(); f != M.end(); ++f ) { if( f->isExternal() ) continue; for (Function::iterator I = f->begin(); I !=

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: >> On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> that is all nice >>> >>> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >>> >>> * centralized >>> * no log parsing at all >>> * honeypot data are "delivered"

Anyone see an issue on asterisk 1.2 that it will not accept the invite from a Cisco gateway. If I turn off voice service voip signaling forward unconditional then Asterisk accepts the call but without cname. Below is a trace. Any help is appreciated. Thanks John Bittner Simlab.net voippbx01*CLI> <-- SIP read from 216.86.35.24:63549: INVITE sip:9734333001 at 69.60.198.130:5060 SIP/2.0

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

Dear R users, I have a matrix composed of lists: m <- matrix( list(), nrow=1, ncol=3 ) m[[ 1, 1 ]] <- list("A", "B") m[[ 1, 2 ]] <- list("A", "C") m[[ 1, 3 ]] <- list("A", "B") and want to get the sub-matrix where cells contain "B". But m[ , "B" %in% m[ 1, ], drop=F ] as well as m[ , "B"

I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text file of ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped? I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary and 12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create firewall drops, and I don't want to compile with wrappers *if* dovecot has an easy ability to do this. If dovecot could parse a flat text file of

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Jan Frode J?ger <jan.frode.jaeger at ntnu.no> wrote: > Hi, > ________________________________________ > From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 00:56 > To: Jan Frode J?ger > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module > >

Ive just tried running that but I'm getting this error: [root at junglised ~]# rpm -ivh http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/icecast-2.3.2-4.el5.i386.rpm Retrieving http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/icecast-2.3.2-4.el5.i386.rpm error: skipping http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/icecast-2.3.2-4.el5.i386.rpm - transfer failed - Unknown or

Hi, ________________________________________ From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 00:56 To: Jan Frode J?ger Cc: syslinux at zytor.com Subject: Re: [syslinux] Updated status on UEFI compliant version of the pxechn-module On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jan Frode J?ger <jan.frode.jaeger at ntnu.no> wrote: Without trying to figure out where data is

I imagine some day in the near future there will be a switch to ipv6. I cannot imagine ever remembering the ip address then...crazy. My question, since i have never done ip6 stuff, is what does that mean on my webservers? Would I just need to replace my ip4 with ip6 in my eths, bonds, bridges, and configuration files...and copy out my iptables to ip6tables, and change the dns servers? all

Is there a way in LLVM , using which I can get Call graph SCCs in reverse post order in a FunctionPass object? -Balpreet -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060501/f34b3700/attachment.html>