similar to: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Possible bug in mkfs.ext3"

2014 Sep 20
0
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. > > I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. I would
2014 Sep 21
1
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On 09/20/2014 12:07 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. >> >> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. >> >> I am reporting this per
2014 Sep 20
0
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 07:56:37PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to > mkfs, > and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. If none of the possible superblocks are valid when using mke2fs -b <NNN>, there's a good chance
2001 Apr 01
3
Which are the steps to apply a Ext3 file system?
Im intending use Ext3 file system in my web farm. Im using RedHat 6.2 (kernel 2.2.16-3) and Turbo Linux Cluster Server 6.0. I have NO SUCCESS in path my own kernel. I downloaded the following ext3 packages: ext3-0.0.2f.tar.gz (linux-2.2.16-3.kdb.diff , linux-2.2.16-3.ext3.diff ) e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.i386.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.src.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0ext3.i386.rpm
2015 Jun 15
2
Any alternative to Single User Mode
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>
2015 Jun 15
1
Any alternative to Single User Mode
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>
2015 Jun 15
2
Any alternative to Single User Mode
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on >>>>
2016 Apr 22
7
[OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"
greetings. centos 6.7 [current] 'disk utility' has started showing message; WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. for sdc5 - /home partition. /dev/sdc5 302243312 156348604 130534968 55% /home /dev/sdc7 80854912 57088 76683952 1% /hdd/c/07 other than time involved to backup
2015 Jun 15
3
Any alternative to Single User Mode
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/ >> . >> I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being >> shown. >> All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at
2000 Nov 20
3
Info before I try this
Is there any more docs on this other then the blurb on beta.redhat.com? I got a spare non-critical victim err... test machine I want to try this on and have all the RPMS, but would really like to chew on a little more detail before I leap. Regards, Henri -- "People die." --The Cynic's Book of Wisdom
2015 Jun 15
5
Two partitions with samd UUID??
On 06/15/2015 07:56 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 06/14/2015 10:08 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> >> >> On 06/14/2015 08:58 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 6/14/2015 6:55 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>> Maybe I used dd at some point. >>>> Would this keep the same UUID? >>> >>> DD just does a blind block by block copy between two devices
2015 Jun 13
6
off topic - need help registering to the smplayer forum
Hi All, smplayer has no mailing list. I tried to register at http://forum.smplayer.info/ucp.php?mode=register but the capchas are so incredibly impossible to discern that I gave up after 5 tries. I tried the audio option, but the audio option plays so garbled it is impossible to understand. My audio is great. I play youtube vids with great clarity. So I am hoping someone who is on that forum to
2015 Jun 13
6
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >> that is not viewable by the user. >> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed >> entries. > You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on > my computer and
2015 Jun 13
3
Installing all the mate desktop rpms
On 06/12/2015 07:22 PM, Always Learning wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:49 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > >> I am running Centos 6.4 >> Could that be the issue? > I'm using C 6.6 > > Try: yum update > > I did. Says nothing marked for update. To wit: # yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, fs-snapshot, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Update Process
2015 Jun 13
5
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>> that is not viewable by the user. >>>> The whitelist tab does NOT
2015 Jun 12
3
[Off Topic] - need help registering to the smplayer forum
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 01:04:03PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > My computer clock is only seconds ahead of my phone, > which is timed to the cellular provider's ntp server. Your clock is an entire day ahead of your cell phone, unless you're emailing us from the future. If you are emailing from the future, is it like the Jetsons? Are there flying cars? That'd be awesome. --
2015 Jun 13
1
Installing all the mate desktop rpms
jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>schreef: On 06/12/2015 08:42 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/12/2015 6:26 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 07:22 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 18:49 -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>> >>>> I am running Centos 6.4 >>>> Could that be the issue? >>> I'm using C 6.6 >>>
2015 Jun 13
4
Installing all the mate desktop rpms
On 06/12/2015 03:39 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > yum install epel-release > yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop" yum groupinstall "MATE Desktop" Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, fs-snapshot, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Group Process Repository testing-1.1-devtools-6 is listed more than once in the configuration Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base:
2015 Jun 15
4
mpv rpm
On 06/15/2015 04:09 PM, jd1008 wrote: > I downloaded mpv-0.2.4-4.fc20.src.rpm from rpmfusion, and: > > /usr/bin/yum-builddep -t --nogpgcheck -y mpv-0.2.4-4.fc20.src.rpm > says: > Error: No Package found for libquvi-devel You can get that, as well as most deps from nux-dextop: http://li.nux.ro/repos.html Peter
2015 Jun 15
3
mpv rpm
jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 10:12 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 06/15/2015 04:09 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> I downloaded mpv-0.2.4-4.fc20.src.rpm from rpmfusion, and: >>> >>> /usr/bin/yum-builddep -t --nogpgcheck -y mpv-0.2.4-4.fc20.src.rpm >>> says: >>> Error: No Package found for libquvi-devel >> You can get that, as well as most deps