Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Bug#577788: dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance"
2014 Sep 03
0
Bug#577788: dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 03:10 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious)
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote:
> > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending
> > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be
2007 Jul 16
2
irqbalance?
Hi All,
If I turn off irqbalance xen/arch/x86/irq.c, does that actually stop XEN from balancing irqs across different physical cpus, or will that override the setting if there are too many interrupts and one of the cpus is overloaded.
Example: i have 4 cpus and i have configured irqbalance= off, so there is no irqbalancing done by xen.
Now if i have affintized all my physical interrutps to one
2014 Sep 04
0
Processed: Re: dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #577788 [src:xen] dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xen' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set
> retitle -1 SMP kernels
2012 Sep 19
5
Bug#688125: xen: CVE-2012-2625
Package: xen
Severity: important
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
This issue is still unfixed in Wheezy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-2625
Patch:
http://xenbits.xensource.com/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/60f09d1ab1fe
Cheers,
Moritz
2013 Jul 08
0
Processed: Re: dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 577788 src:xen
Bug #577788 [src:linux-2.6] dom0 kernels should suggest irqbalance
Warning: Unknown package 'src:linux-2.6'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'src:xen'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #577788 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed
2006 Mar 28
2
Asterisk & SMP: Is irqbalance Redundant on 2.6 Kernels?
Asterisk users,
I posted the following email to the Fedora users list
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-March/msg04154.html>
and it got no responses, so now I'm calling on your expertise. Please
take a look at it and share your knowledge on the subject with me.
Additionally, let me know if you believe what I am trying to do is
critically flawed. It's possible
2006 Apr 04
2
irqbalance is dead, can not shutdown
After updating to centos 4.3, I notice a failure in terminating
irqbalance whenever i shutdown the system. Checking the services after
the system reboot i see the error in irqbalance:
"irqbalance dead but subsys locked"
Can anyone tell me what irqbalance is and if it safe to disable it ?
Why i dont see it in centos 4.2?
Thanks in advance.
Thai
2006 Aug 25
1
Does irqbalance actually do anything?
I've got several SMP machines, some running CentOS 4.3 and some running
Fedora Core 4. All machine are kept fully updated. A few are
Pentium3-based and a few are Pentium4-based. They are all running the
irqbalance daemon.
The distribution of interrupts across CPUs is indeed kept balanced, yet
even after months of uptime ps shows no CPU use whatsoever by irqbalance.
This from a
2012 Jul 11
12
99% iowait on one core in 8 core processor
Hi All,
We have a xen server and using 8 core processor.
I can see that there is 99% iowait on only core 0.
02:28:49 AM CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %idle intr/s
02:28:54 AM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.65 0.00 0.02 2.24 85.08 1359.88
02:28:54 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.21 0.00 0.20 3.19 0.40 847.11
02:28:54 AM
2015 Mar 28
2
Why is irqbalance not balancing?
I am running irqbalance with default configuration on an Atom 330 machine. This CPU has 2 physical cores + 2 SMT (aka Hyperthreading) cores.
As shown below the interrupt for the eth0 device is always on CPUs 0 and 1, with CPUs 2 and 3 left idle. But why?
Maybe irqbalance prefers physical cores? My understanding, though, is that the even-numbered CPUs are the physical cores, with the
2012 May 10
0
CEBA-2012:0552 CentOS 6 irqbalance Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0552
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0552.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6e8269873c1c7ace5c06cc542df05d9ef3be3d3cac8bc7c5ca3de75594223a98 irqbalance-0.55-30.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2012 Aug 13
0
CEBA-2012:1157 CentOS 6 irqbalance Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1157
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1157.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
e1a19a11f0053339035178325626edb17e0c89be3121cdd39c6ab2b62f720024 irqbalance-0.55-35.el6_3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2013 Jul 16
0
CEBA-2013:1066 CentOS 6 irqbalance Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1066
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1066.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
5dbee5fc629d67f3e0f8b6483c1ba928dd30a186de4c532e42ad9494700fba74 irqbalance-1.0.4-4.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2014 Jan 27
0
CEBA-2014:0096 CentOS 6 irqbalance Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0096
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0096.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c9d21f1ccbda1fd26b75f29aeb8632a8027d588ff13b28618d61f46467a8bf3b irqbalance-1.0.4-8.el6_5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2014 May 14
0
CEBA-2014:0489 CentOS 6 irqbalance Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0489
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0489.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6c4dd1990742ad44b298b0c344ffed77ad7bc556950b926fcfe18eea77214859 irqbalance-1.0.4-9.el6_5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2015 Jun 27
0
CEBA-2015:1191 CentOS 5 irqbalance BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1191
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1191.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0ec224e1af235b81234eea49486b3cf28562457ce4c67ae3da06cdc7e5f4ba37 irqbalance-0.55-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
x86_64:
2018 Mar 14
0
CEBA-2018:0514 CentOS 6 irqbalance BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:0514
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0514
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b239ee5fa1a53baebaa441ac91cedf2dc18881ef2e84d2a1af47cc0d08138470 irqbalance-1.0.7-8.el6_9.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2012 Sep 05
1
Bug#686764: xen: Multiple security issues
Package: xen
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see the following links:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/11
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/10
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/9
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/8
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/7
2012 May 25
4
rspec first steps troubles
I try do implement tests for my puppet code and was playing with
rspec-puppet but the following code gives me errors
require ''spec_helper''
describe ''irqbalance'' do
it { should include_class(''irqbalance'') }
it { should include_class(''irqbalance::data'') }
it { should
2015 Aug 06
0
CEBA-2015:1560 CentOS 7 irqbalance BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1560
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1560.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
0f73d267b7c9712b2e5afd7d51b0c5041455f54df0d7f4079facfaad256dd1fb irqbalance-1.0.7-2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
Source: