similar to: Processed: block 718767 with 710650

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > unblock 718767 with 710650 Bug #718767 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 4.00.1 718767 was blocked by: 726010 710650 718767 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 718767: 710650 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 718767:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 710650 with 713349 Bug #710650 [src:xen-api] xen-api: FTBFS: gcc: error: /home/blank/debian/xen/releases/xen/xen-4.2.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/../../../../tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so: No such file or directory- build ocaml/xapi rrddump.opt 710650 was not blocked by any bugs. 710650 was not blocking any bugs.

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 728743 331.20-1 Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms Marked as

Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : > Please don't think this way. > > I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian: > > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214 packages in Debian:

On 09/06/2013 02:42 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a ?crit : >> tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to >> get that fixed before starting. > > I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming > of an OCaml library (type-conv -> type_conv). Hi, I had a patch from upstream

On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about >> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team >> is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the >> old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if

Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : > I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new > upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. > Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are > different, and just using upstream 1.6 doesn't cut it. It needs to be > ported to Debian, and that's

Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : > However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about > it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team > is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the > old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if that helps, plus add some > blocking bugs so that the rest of Debian

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > severity 1073913 serious Bug #1073913 [src:xen] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Problem in C stubs) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 1074548 serious Bug #1074548 [src:supermin] FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses Pervasives) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 1077899 serious Bug

On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are >> different, and just using upstream 1.6

Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:42:06 +0000 with message-id <E1WKBKw-0004SD-Mw at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#740517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #710650, regarding xen-api: FTBFS: gcc: error: /home/blank/debian/xen/releases/xen/xen-4.2.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/../../../../tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so: No such

Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a ?crit : > tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to > get that fixed before starting. I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming of an OCaml library (type-conv -> type_conv). Now, xen-api FTBFS because of what looks like an API change in some (C) dependency: > [...] > + gcc -g

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 986475 4.1.9-1 Bug #986475 [libocamlnet-ocaml-doc] libocamlnet-ocaml-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/examples -> ../libocamlnet-ocaml-doc/examples Marked as found in versions ocamlnet/4.1.9-1.

Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a test. Also, I noticed another patch 'fix-xen-4.2-paths.patch' that might be relevant. Thomas,

On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: >> Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a ?crit : >>> I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as "new >>> upstream release" for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. >>> Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for

Le 24/09/2013 15:48, St?phane Glondu a ?crit : > If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following > new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, > nova-compute-xen. > > xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf > package and could be removed from testing. > > On the other hand, both nova-* packages

On 09/24/2013 10:04 PM, St?phane Glondu wrote: > Le 24/09/2013 15:48, St?phane Glondu a ?crit : >> If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following >> new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, >> nova-compute-xen. >> >> xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf >> package and could be

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 630201 with 646694 Bug #630201 [release.debian.org] transition: liblzma 5 Was blocked by: 625115 Added blocking bug(s) of 630201: 646694 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 630201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 678719 with 685992 Bug #678719 {Done: Bastian Blank <waldi at debian.org>} [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: please label all created directories for SE Linux 678719 was not blocked by any bugs. 678719 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 678719: 685992 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 698093 with 644390 Bug #698093 [libvirt-bin] libvirt-bin: Enable Xen libxl backend 698093 was not blocked by any bugs. 698093 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 698093: 644390 and 668641 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698093: