similar to: Processed: bug 705659 is forwarded to http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-08/msg01755.html

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 658305 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00493.html Bug #658305 [xen-utils-common] Prevent silently failing on duplicate vifname Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00493.html'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 437127 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00455.html Bug #437127 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: vif-common fails to identify ip address of ethernet device Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00455.html'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 588477 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00456.html Bug #588477 [xen-utils-common] network-bridge: start: 95 sec sleep/bridge without a default gateway Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-07/msg00456.html'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 797205 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg01231.html Bug #797205 [xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64] xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: Xen live migration dom0 memory swap Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg01231.html'. > tags 797205 + moreinfo Bug #797205

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 810964 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg02479.html Bug #810964 [xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64] only partial EDAC information with Xen Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg02479.html'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 705659 + upstream Bug #705659 [xen-utils-common] Xen scripts use old-skool "ip" command syntax Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 705659 + patch Bug #705659 [xen-utils-common] Xen scripts use old-skool "ip" command syntax Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 705659 + fixed-upstream Bug #705659 [xen-utils-common] Xen scripts use old-skool "ip" command syntax Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 705659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 509885 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4763 Bug#509885: does not cleanly update from logtail2 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4763. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.4-2 Severity: minor The syntax that the scripts use prevents one from creating a vif named "dev", for example. Attached is a patch for one script, but the syntax that skips using the "dev" keyword is present in other scripts, like vif-bridge. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

This is a follow-up on the discussion originally posted on the R-devel list ( http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e4/devel/08/06/1901.html ), as I have encountered the exact same issue mentioned in Martin's email. Here is a simplified version of my problem: ##================================================================= ## I created a package, say, "tmpA", with a NAMESPACE with

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 477525 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 477525 4.4.0-1 Bug #477525 [src:xen] xend with network-route fails to start, missing $vifnum Marked as

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 599520 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 599520 4.4.0-1 Failed to add fixed version '4.4.0-1' to 599520: Not altering archived bugs; see

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 502123 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 502123 4.4.0-1 Bug #502123 [src:xen] xen-utils-unstable: Debian patch breaks paravirtualized guest initrd

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 494727 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 494727 4.4.0-1 Bug #494727 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.2-1: Fail to define a new domain. Marked as fixed in

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (was ijc at debian.org). > usertags 532603 toolstack-xend There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: toolstack-xend. > close 532603 4.4.0-1 Bug #532603 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.2-1: incorrectly calls network-script Marked as fixed in

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 705490 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 Bug #705490 [src:xen] Uses deprecated RUN+="socket:" Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1843'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 705490:

If one of the authors is listening: http://www.asteriskdocs.org/html/apas02.html lists usereqphone 2 times. One of the entries should really be useragent. And the example for usereqphone is wrong. Regards, Philipp Kempgen -- amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones. Asterisk? ->

One of the links to the subversion repository is wrong. Under the heading which starts: If your own project is in Subversion and you?d like RSpec on Rails to always follow HEAD, install with -x: the second link: ruby script/plugin install -x svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/trunk/ rspec_on_rails/vendor/plugin/rspec_on_rails should be: ruby script/plugin install -x

Bugs item #17714, was opened at 2008-02-02 06:58 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=17714&group_id=35 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Dale E. Edmons (linuxfan) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: http://wxruby.rubyforge.org/doc/frame.html Display is too wide for even a wide lcd!

Hi, For the section regarding Functions, the doc says: "The first basic block in a program is special in two ways: it is immediately executed on entrance to the function, and it is not allowed to have predecessor basic blocks" Is this really supposed to say: "The first basic block in a functionis special in two ways:" ? Thanks, Ivan --------------------- Ivan Novick