similar to: Bitcoin Mining

Asic-technologies.com 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 6 Board (has 48 chips) - 30 BTC - $3000 USD This unit will make: Coins per 24h at these conditions 0.2965 BTC Revenue per day29.08 USD Each module board uses about 31 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied , Case, power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled All the boards are linked together , With one main controller. Easy to

Asic-technologies.com We make ASIC Bitcoin Mining Gear using the ASIC chips Sourced from Taiwan. 3.1 -3.3 GHash/sec 4 Board (has 32 chips) - 15 BTC 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 12 Board (has 96 chips) - 30 BTC Each module board uses about 39 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied (No case) power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled (suggest that you insert board's into a

Asic-technologies.com We make ASIC Bitcoin Mining Gear using the ASIC chips Sourced from Taiwan. 3.1 -3.3 GHash/sec 4 Board (has 32 chips) - 15 BTC 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 12 Board (has 96 chips) - 30 BTC Each module board uses about 39 Watts of power. Mining board's supplied (No case) power supply , On-board heat sink , USB connectors. Ready assembled (suggest that you insert board's into a

For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL doesn't matter anymore. -=- That spec file

Alice Wonder wrote: > For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 > > https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec > > I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is > miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. > > With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is

On 02/24/2016 06:06 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

Hello Rusers, Introducing *coindeskr - *an R package to access coindesk API Bitcoin Price Index (Including Historic Price). https://github.com/amrrs/coindeskr https://cran.r-project.org/package=coindeskr Please share your feedback using it. Regards, Abdul [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org

> Meanwhile banks like Chase charge poor people $12.00 a month just have > checking and push debit card paychecks on low income jobs where they > charge just for the poor to check how much they have on it. That bad, huh?

Hello Rusers, Introducing *coindeskr - *an R package to access coindesk API Bitcoin Price Index (Including Historic Price). https://github.com/amrrs/coindeskr https://cran.r-project.org/package=coindeskr Please share your feedback using it. Regards, Abdul [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org

Dear all, Considering this simple example of hexbinplot: mixdata <- data.frame(x = c(rnorm(5000), rnorm(5000,4,1.5)), y = c(rnorm(5000), rnorm(5000,2,3)), a = gl(2, 5000)) fig <- hexbinplot(y ~ x | a, mixdata) print(fig) update(fig, colramp = BTC) produces a bad (non-updated) legend. Compare it with: hexbinplot(y ~ x | a, mixdata, colramp = BTC) What

> The compare of interest is clear, I think. It compares a Vector Induction Variable with a broadcasted loop invariant value, aka the BTC. Obtaining the latter operand is the goal, clearly, but to do so, the former operand needs to be recognized as a VIV. Yep, exactly that. > What if this compare is not generated by LV’s fold-tail-by-masking transformation? Not sure I completely follow

Hi. I tryed to install new xen 3.2 in my new server (amd64 debian etch) ,but when I try to boot some 64bit pv domain debian etch amd64 with kernel  vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen I get Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! When I try to boot it with my old 32bit kernel everything is ok what can be the problem? mysql:/# xm create /machines/mysql.cfg Using config file

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> Partially revert "com32: add a centralized bitops header" This reverts part of commit db74cf6c4182f40ecf7fad1f04799d09d82f896d. The usage of the centralized bitops in com32/lib/vsscanf.c is not correct because the bitmap that we're accessing is too large for the 'bt', 'bts' and 'btc' instructions to

On Jul 17, 2013 7:41 AM, "Joerg Sonnenberger" <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:54:21AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > > Jim Grosbach wrote: > > > No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been > > > previously noted. > > > > I don't give a shit about whether you think it is

This is a patch to X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT() which was hashed over on the Developers list with Intel concurring. It checks whether the -Oz (optimize for size) flag is set or whether the containing function's PGO cold attribute is set. If either are true it emits BT for tests of bits 8-31 instead of TEST. Previously, TEST was always used for bits 0-31 and BT was always used for bits

(Resent without HTML) On 07/14/2013 10:19 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Now, there are possible cases where you want to make the size explicit > because you are mixing memory operand sizes and there can be nasty > performance implications of doing a 32-bit write and then doing a > 64-bit read of the result. I'm not actually aware of us having ever > worried/cared about it, but

Hi Ayal, Let me start with commenting on this: > A dedicated intrinsic that freezes the compare instruction, for no apparent reason, may potentially cripple subsequent passes from further optimizing the vectorized loop. The point is we have a very good reason, which is that it passes on the right information on the backend, enabling opimisations as opposed to crippling them. The compare

Ok. To go back to the original issue, would it be meaningful to add a SCEVUMax(0, BTC) on the final BTC computed by SCEV? So that it does not use "negative values"? On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:40 PM Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 8/15/2018 2:27 PM, Alexandre Isoard wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand the poison/undef/UB distinctions. >