similar to: Bug#710650: xen-api: FTBFS: gcc: error: /home/blank/debian/xen/releases/xen/xen-4.2.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/../../../../tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so: No such file or directory- build ocaml/xapi rrddump.opt

Thanks, I'll take a look at this. Mike On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:28 AM, David Su?rez <david.sephirot at gmail.com>wrote: > Source: xen-api > Version: 1.3.2-15 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages

Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:42:06 +0000 with message-id <E1WKBKw-0004SD-Mw at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#740517: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #710650, regarding xen-api: FTBFS: gcc: error: /home/blank/debian/xen/releases/xen/xen-4.2.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/../../../../tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so: No such

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for > Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for > `configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system > for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and > configures, generates makefiles, project files for IDEs, etc as

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > block 710650 with 713349 Bug #710650 [src:xen-api] xen-api: FTBFS: gcc: error: /home/blank/debian/xen/releases/xen/xen-4.2.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/../../../../tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so: No such file or directory- build ocaml/xapi rrddump.opt 710650 was not blocked by any bugs. 710650 was not blocking any bugs.

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > found 728743 331.20-1 Bug #728743 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated Bug #733816 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] khotkeys launches actions with SIGHUP blocked, leading to unclosable xterms Marked as

On May 17, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > I don't know how much LLVM build system is tied to the GNU toolchain > or > how much it depends on *nix features, but suppossing that adding > support > for MSVC++ is impractical, perhaps it would be simpler to implement a > Makefile-based build system for MSVC++ than to keep up to date the > project files. This would

[Repost: The mailing list was down yesterday. Sorry if this is a duplicate] I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for `configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and configures, generates makefiles,

> Hi there, > > we're running into sporadic (!) problems when users access files read/write using rational clearcase. > The production is running on unix and automatically starts several telnet sessions from unix to win2k > (but only one at a time) that copy directory trees onto the samba share (sunos 5.8/samba 2.2.8a). > After a while in various parts of the production

Source: xen Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111022 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[5]: Entering directory `/build/xen-njlTaX/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/check' > PYTHON=python2.6

Source: xen Version: 4.1.4-4 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value

Dear Debian maintainer, The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf templates used in xen-api. This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with users and its aims are: - to improve the use of English in all debconf templates; - to make the wording of debconf templates more consistent; - to

Source: xen Version: 4.2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130609 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?' > mkdir -p debian/build/build-utils_amd64 > cp -al CODING_STYLE COPYING

Source: xen Version: 4.1.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[7]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware' > /usr/bin/make -C etherboot

Package: xen-unstable Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2. Version 4.2 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors and give people an advance warning. The bug below is in your package though and not because I'm using a snapshot of the compiler so please take a look at it. You can reproduce this with the

Binaries should be rebuilt if mllib.cma/mllib.cmxa or customize.cma/customize.cmxa change. Fixes commit 1e2877c6f4d1d254026d38b1cac4895d8dba7d5d. --- builder/Makefile.am | 12 ++++++++++-- customize/Makefile.am | 3 ++- dib/Makefile.am | 5 ++++- get-kernel/Makefile.am | 5 ++++- mllib/Makefile.am | 15 ++++++++++++--- resize/Makefile.am | 5 ++++- sparsify/Makefile.am

This should make it possible to build useful OCaml bindings on architectures other than i386 and amd64 (Debian bug #589809). --- ocaml/Makefile.am | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am index b3f5e14..b9451e3 100644 --- a/ocaml/Makefile.am +++ b/ocaml/Makefile.am @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ hivex_c.o:

* Richard W.M. Jones: >> Wouldn't a rule without commands such as >> >> mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma >> >> also prevent make from building the two targets in parallel? > > Doesn't that mean that if mlguestfs.cmxa is out of date, simply > running the mlguestfs.cma rule will build it (which it won't)? Not sure if I understand you. If I cause

Simplifies the build a bit. This is on top of the previous SELinux relabelling patch set, although not related to it. Rich.

Hello, I'm trying to use Llvm_bitwriter + ocamlbuild, but it doesn't recognize its dependency on Unix, so it doesn't compile. Minimal case: (* FILE: minimal.ml *) let main () = let m = Llvm.create_module (Llvm.global_context ()) "test" in ignore (Llvm_bitwriter.output_bitcode stdout m) ;; main () (* FILE: _tags *) <*.{byte,native}>: g++, use_unix, use_llvm,

* Richard W.M. Jones: >> I think that an extra target (mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma) would make >> the .NOTPARALLEL unnecessary. > > Right, I remember this was a problem now. > > It was fixed by: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/dce94f3e266ed3f1fc634a1ef6953f2db1510963 > > Do you think we could re-add the stamp-file / touch $@ ? Sure, it