similar to: SSL only working in DEBUG mode

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm using NUT 2.7.1 in Ubuntu Server 14.04 Trusty Tahr > > Thank you for taking the time to write up this bug report. > Well, thank you for replying so quickly :-) > Just for reference, what

2015-03-26 9:03 GMT+01:00 Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com>: > Hey mister M' > > A first huge thanks for taking care of this, and so late in the night. I > know that it's not easy... > > (sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity) > Le 25 mars 2015 18:49, "Emilien Kia" <kiae.dev at gmail.com> a ?crit : > > > > > >

On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought start-stop-daemon was involved because it closes stdin/stdout file > > descriptors after exec()'ing the daemon. I tried "--no-close" option to no > > avail. After that, I

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com> wrote: > What puzzles me is the difference > in behaviour between debug mode and non-debug mode. What could possibly > happen after upsd detaches itself from the calling shell that make upsd fail > to handle SSL stuff while working flawlessly without detaching? I'm thinking it's something here:

Hello all, With a really fast lookup, I think it is probably a problem of NSS initialization (key loading...) . As the problem occurs only when upsd is forked and as nss is initialized ( https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/server/upsd.c#L1008)before upsd deamonify ( https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/master/server/upsd.c#L1035), I suspect NSS to not be fork-safe. I will

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > I thought start-stop-daemon was involved because it closes stdin/stdout > file > > descriptors after exec()'ing the daemon. I tried "--no-close" option to > no > > avail. After that, I validated the init script working fine with > > UPSD_OPTIONS="-D" in

Came across this in the process of troubleshooting: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2011-November/007249.html My whole reason for compiling from source is to add SSL support (as it doesn't seem available through the package manager). Apt list shows these installed: libusb-1.0-0-dev/stable,now 2:1.0.22-2 armhf [installed] libusb-1.0-0/stable,now 2:1.0.22-2 armhf

Ah, ok, apt-get remove libldb1 ldb-tools Then try again : apt install samba winbind acl The replacement of libldb1 to libldb2 is missing something. I'll have a look at that. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Lmloge [mailto:lmloge at orange.fr] > Verzonden: vrijdag 20 december 2019 13:15 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org

2012/10/12 Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> > Hi guys, > Hi Emilien and the list, This is a pull request to finally merge NSS feature in nut trunk: > https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/3 > I'd like to take a moment to shed some more light on this important development, which lasted 3 years: - the initial

Some precisions: we are not alone, some projects had similar problem: http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/785 And the problem is really coming from NSS initialization. Discussion about the issue here : http://osdir.com/ml/mozilla.crypto/2002-08/msg00016.html There is a workaround to use NSS with fork but it is more setting a flag to share some resources (primarily sockets) but must

On 08/03/2016 06:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> said: >> Something in the curl build will always link the binary against >> OpenSSL if the openssl-lib package is present, and will always link >> the library against OpenSSL if any TLS option is enabled in the >> configure. > > No, it doesn't. You can

El 30/03/15 a les 11:38, Rowland Penny ha escrit: >> Is there any hope to have this issue fixed? Where does one report bugs >> in the sernet packaging? >> >> >> TIA > > Have you tried to install sssd-ad ? that link you posted was about > installing on 12.04, things may have changed. You could try 'apt-get > install -s sssd-ad' > This will tell

shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 delset shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add hide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path random unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path urandom unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path zero unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path pty\* unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path pty\* unhide shell# /sbin/devfs rule -s 2 add path tty\* unhide shell#

2015-03-21 17:06 GMT+01:00 Melkor Lord <melkor.lord at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > Some precisions: >> >> we are not alone, some projects had similar problem: >> http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/785 >> And the problem is really coming from NSS initialization. Discussion

Hi all. I've updated google-chrome to recent version and it gets unbooted, when I fired google-chrome up I got messages like these: /usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome) /usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome) /opt/google/chrome/chrome:

I'm testing both sunfreeware and official sun (sfw) samba on Solaris 10. For some reason since yesterday, the smbd process just "hangs" at the start. No log is generated on server side Where smbd is started, I can't find any open port on 139 or 145 My OS is Solaris 10 # uname -a SunOS labo2 5.10 Generic_142900-13 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120 #

Hi Charles and the list here is an update on 2.7.3 2015-03-20 3:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:00 PM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> > wrote: > > * #158: the branch has been collapsed into one commit, but additional >> documentation (nut-names.txt) is needed: >>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> wrote: Some precisions: > > we are not alone, some projects had similar problem: > http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/785 > And the problem is really coming from NSS initialization. Discussion about > the issue here : http://osdir.com/ml/mozilla.crypto/2002-08/msg00016.html > Wow! Congratulations on

On 10/5/2020 11:58 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/10/2020 16:30, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Using MIT5 backend with Samba.. > I hope you mean on the clients, the use of MIT as the kdc on a Samba > DC is experimental and shouldn't be used in production Hi Roland, our environment uses CentOS 7.? I don't have much choice but to use this

hi guys, I have problems with authentification in a 2003 domain membership configuration of samba 3.0.7. I'm a newbie in linux systems, then I will give you my configuration process of the program. The samba server is installed on a Redhat 9.0 without any base install of samba, without kerberos and with the open LDAP RPM installed. I follow this procedure to build binarie from sources