similar to: upsonic IRT1000 on ubuntu 14.04lts

On Nov 12, 2014, at 2:49 AM, Klint Gore <kgore4 at une.edu.au> wrote: > Can someone give me a push in the right direction with this? I?m trying to get an upsonic IRT1000 to work on ubuntu 14.04lts using the usb connection. The most likely drivers (blazer_usb and usbhid-ups) don?t seem to recognize it or I?ve got the configuration parameters wrong. I?ve got no idea what driver it

-----Original Message----- >From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clepple at gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2014 12:12 AM > >I am surprised that the blazer_usb configuration didn't work. If you leave off >the matching options, does this find the UPS? > >[upsonicRT1000] > driver=blazer_usb ## or nutdrv_qx > port=auto > desc="UPSonic RT1000"

Hi all, I have a client who is currently using an UPSonic IRT1000 UPS (http://www.upsonic.com.au/industrial-rt.php), and is running NUT 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 on Ubuntu Hardy, which I've not been able to get to work using either USB or RS232. I *believe* the UPS is supposed to use the Megatec driver, but am not 100% sure. I can see three possible resolutions to my problem, which leads me to

Hi Heinz, 2010/5/30 heinz > Thank you for your nut-2.4.3 system. I had big troubles getting it to work > with the UPSONIC PROFFICE 650 UPS in USB mode. > > I had to rewrite the get_data_phoenix() function in drivers/megatec_usb.c > file. > It now appears to be working correctly. I have attached the source of the > modified function in case you might want to add it to a

I am working with a number of our customers to ensure that NUT works with different UPS's on Freebsd 9.1. The current one I am looking is support for: *Upsonic Commercial UPS CXR 2000 - 2000VA/1200W - Rack/Tower* What seems to be supported in Freebsd is: CXR1000 blazer_ser LAN Saver 600 genericups upstype=0 Power Guardian genericups upstype=7 PrOffice 650 USB blazer_usb DS-800 USB

Charles, the out from the command below as well as the system.log file are below your email. It does look like a permission issue but what one? Thx chris On 2/5/14, 6:43 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > >> However, we are using NUT 2.6.5. >> >> Are we missing something by running 2.6.5 rather then >> 2.7.1? If so, I

Thx for the info Charles. Here is what I am seeing from 'usbconfig list' ugen0.1: <EHCI root HUB Intel> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.1: <EHCI root HUB Intel> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen0.2: <product 0x0024 vendor 0x8087> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE ugen1.2: <product 0x0024 vendor

Charles, We run everything as "root" :) However, we are using NUT 2.6.5. Are we missing something by running 2.6.5 rather then 2.7.1? If so, I can build/install 2.7.1. Thx chris Would On 2/4/14, 9:05 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 4, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > >> ugen1.3: <USB UPS PPC> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON > [...]

Charles, Here is the output: ugen1.3: <USB UPS PPC> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON bLength = 0x0012 bDescriptorType = 0x0001 bcdUSB = 0x0200 bDeviceClass = 0x0000 bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0008 idVendor = 0x06da idProduct = 0x0005 bcdDevice = 0x0003 iManufacturer = 0x0003 <PPC>

On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:03 PM, Chris Duffy wrote: >> Please run this: >> >> /usr/local/libexec/nut/blazer_usb -a UPSonic -u root -D >> >> and send the output back to the list. >> > Output from the above command: > > 0.000000 debug level is '1' > 0.248714 Supported UPS detected with megatec protocol > 1.268575

On Feb 4, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > ugen1.3: <USB UPS PPC> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON [...] > idVendor = 0x06da > idProduct = 0x0005 This VID:PID combination should be handled by blazer_usb. In NUT 2.7.1 and later, this would be covered by nutdrv_qx as well. > I am running all the ups programs as root, i.e. "ps -aux" shows:

On Jan 31, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Chris Duffy wrote: > The current one I am looking is support for: > > Upsonic Commercial UPS CXR 2000 - 2000VA/1200W - Rack/Tower > > What seems to be supported in Freebsd is: Small clarification: the hardware compatibility list isn't broken down by operating system (theoretically, the drivers should work on any POSIX system, with additional

On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Chris Duffy wrote: > Thx for the info Charles. > > Here is what I am seeing from > 'usbconfig list' [...] > ugen1.3: <USB UPS PPC> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON > > > The last line I guess is key. Unfortunately, it is not very unique: the vendor can pick the string "USB UPS PPC", but the drivers

Hello, Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.38 (2.7.2) USB communication driver 0.32 No matching HID UPS found Driver failed to start (exit status=1) I followed a thread with the same title, more or less, having permission problems. I applied that solution. My problem seems different. # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 010: ID 0665:5161

On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > However, we are using NUT 2.6.5. > > Are we missing something by running 2.6.5 rather then > 2.7.1? If so, I can build/install 2.7.1. Well, 2.6.5 is from August 2012, so it's not the newest. And eventually, we would like people to switch to the shiny new nutdrv_qx driver which is in 2.7.1. But I'm pretty much guessing here

Charles, here is the command(s) output using uhidd.... # uhidd -v -u /dev/ugen1.3ugen1.3[0]-> HID interface ugen1.3[0]-> Report descriptor size = 27 ugen1.3[0]-> Kernel driver is active ugen1.3[0]-> kernel driver detached! ugen1.3[0]-> Find IN interrupt ep: 0x81 packet_size=0x8 # /usr/local/libexec/nut/blazer_usb -a UPSonic -u root -DDDD 0.000000 debug level is

On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > So since this is a new type of UPSonic UPS, do you think > the vendor screwed up or is it just some quirk on Freebsd? It's a pretty fundamental design flaw, although it isn't uncommon among USB devices aimed at the Windows market, and to their credit, it does make implementation and deployment simpler on Windows. Neither the FreeBSD

Thx Charles, So since this is a new type of UPSonic UPS, do you think the vendor screwed up or is it just some quirk on Freebsd? Yes, if you can look into this I would appreciate it. I do not see anyone else on the Web attempting to use this new device yet.....but....... Regards chris On 2/6/14, 8:24 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Chris Duffy wrote: > >>

Hello, I am trying to get a "no-brand" (LMS DATA, model no LMSP1200RI) UPS to work with NUT. I now realise I should have checked compatibility with NUT before purchase. My other UPS (APC) works perfectly..... Anyway, I have spent a good day trying to get this thing working. #lsusb Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0001:0000 Fry's ElectronicsDevice Descriptor: bLength 18

Use the name from ups.conf in front of "@localhost". ?The re?sult is quite different ;) root at artu:~# upsc Elit at artu Init SSL without certificate database Error: Driver not connected > What if you try nutdrv_qx without specifying megatec? (It should > autodetect.) > ?Here is the result: ? root at artu:~# upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller