similar to: Please help - ACP Back-UPS CS 350

Hi all, I have an eaton ENV800HA connected for a freebsd 9.0 box with nut 2.6.5 installed (on the supported list). The UPS is connected using the Blazer_USB driver (not sure how to check its version). When I kick off upsd it detects the UPS no problems and I get all my information: battery.charge: 100 battery.voltage: 13.60 battery.voltage.high: 13.00 battery.voltage.low: 10.40

I'm trying to use a Nas4Free storage system. This same hardware worked fine on Freenas 0.7.2. O/S: Nas4Free 9.0.0.1.148 which comes with nut 2.6.4. UPS is an APC Back UPS RS 800. USB interface. Driver : usbhid-ups Port: auto my NAS is communicating with the UPS, but in testing power failures, I'm not getting the shutdown to be handled properly. When I pull the AC plug on the UPS,

On Oct 9, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Louis G. <louis at frentzgzesh.info> wrote: > > Charles, > > That was the PR1500LCDRT2U on the FreeBSD. I have not tried the CP900VR on the FreeBSD box yet. I can tell you that the CP900VR does work as expected on the Nas4Free one though. I am thinking it is the way the driver parses the USB hex identifier. There might be a filter that is not

I've setup nas4free (latest version 11.0.0.4, which has NUT 2.7.4) in a VM and configured it via webinterface to my APC UPS and set "shutdown mode" to "UPS goes on battery" with a timer of 30s. Then I started runtime calibration on the UPS and after 30s nas4free has shut down! I think this is not the correct behavior, since the status was "OB CAL". The system

I'm using Nas4Free, and I'm getting the following message all the time in the Daemon log: usbhid-ups[42466]: libusb_get_report: Unknown Error I'm running Nas4Free 9.2.0.1 Shigawire Driver usbhid-ups Nut Version is 2.7.1 Internal verion 0.38 UPS Info from Nas4Free Manufacturer:CP1500PFCLCD Model:CRCA102*AF1 The model UPS I'm running is a Cyber Power CP1500PFCLCD, other

On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Incze Andras wrote: > Having the next problem, manually adding via WinSCP in the upsd.users file the user for remote monitoring, saving the file, WinNUT client connects after "upsd -c reload" in NAS4Free console, but if I restart the NAS4Free system, the slave user disappears from upsd.users and remains only the master user. > NAS4Free is version

Thanks, the strange is that I could set in this way the master user. At NAS4Free forum cannot get help, I presented the problem there too, but no real help. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Incze Andras wrote: > > > Having the next problem, manually adding via WinSCP in the upsd.users > file the

Hello Having the next problem, manually adding via WinSCP in the upsd.users file the user for remote monitoring, saving the file, WinNUT client connects after "upsd -c reload" in NAS4Free console, but if I restart the NAS4Free system, the slave user disappears from upsd.users and remains only the master user. NAS4Free is version 9.1.0.1 rev 724 and NUT is the version what is included.

Hello, I'm trying to integrate HAST to NAS4Free (FreeBSD 9.1-RC3). Now I have created version 9.1.0.1.531. http://sourceforge.net/projects/nas4free/files/NAS4Free-9.1.0.1/9.1.0.1.531/ Basic CARP + HAST + iSCSI target setup can be done, but very frequently I get hastctl hang when called: /sbin/hastctl status /sbin/hastctl dump Is it better for this method not to call from a script? or

New --prefix option to specify a prefix for the extracted file names. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- get-kernel/virt-get-kernel.pod | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 1523363..01297f0 100644 --- a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml +++ b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml @@

New --unversioned-names option to save extracted files just with their base name (i.e. "vmlinux", "initrd.img"). --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 17 +++++++++++++---- get-kernel/virt-get-kernel.pod | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 646a240..1523363 100644 ---

No one knows anything about this? I've seen some references to this before, but no solutions? If there is more detailed information I can get from command line, please let me know what to run. Thanks! > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:43:11 -0700 > From: Everett Tsang <snufflebear87 at hotmail.com> > To: "nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org" >

On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Johnny Wong <e430benz98 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > OS = NAS4Free (FreeBSD Revision: 199506) What does that revision number correspond to in FreeBSD release numbers? (e.g. 9.3, 10.0) > NUT Version = 2.7.3 for other parts of NUT version is listed below > NUT is part of the NAS4Free distribution > Device = Tripp Lite SMART1300LCDT URL

I have gotten the links to the ./configure for NUT for NAS4Free see nas4free build makefile http://sourceforge.net/p/nas4free/code/ ... t/Makefile config files: http://sourceforge.net/p/nas4free/code/ ... nut/files/ I hope this give some insights On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:00 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:08 AM, Johnny Wong

Thank You very much !!! Now I see how was entered the master password in the file : "-v "concat(' password = ',//system/password)" -n \" I will test the proposed solution. Two questions - Do I need separate users for each WinNUT client or they can use the same user for monitoring&shutdown client machines ? - This is maybe a newbie question,

On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Incze Andras wrote: > Thanks, the strange is that I could set in this way the master user. That is odd. The development version of NAS4Free seems to be regenerating the entire upsd.users file: http://sourceforge.net/p/nas4free/code/848/tree/trunk/build/ports/nut/files/nut.sh.in To address your original concern (adding remote users for monitoring), I would

Simple refactoring, no actual behaviour changes. --- get-kernel/get_kernel.ml | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) diff --git a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml index 8ca7ca0..3b27740 100644 --- a/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml +++ b/get-kernel/get_kernel.ml @@ -23,104 +23,106 @@ module G = Guestfs open Printf

On Aug 23, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Incze Andras wrote: > There is some problem with formatting :( > > If I paste how was written, the structure is wrong formatted, is putted somewhere right after the end of 1st part with master in the generated file. Can you be more specific? You can attach text files if needed. > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at

There is some problem with formatting :( If I paste how was written, the structure is wrong formatted, is putted somewhere right after the end of 1st part with master in the generated file. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Incze Andras wrote: > > > Thanks, the strange is that I could set in this way

Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly work. I have now booted a live CD and using utilities there. It seems the checksum value is