similar to: Voltage override in megatec and megatec-over-usb [was: Re: nut-2.0.5 megatec + Online Xanto]

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups driver. This means the driver cannot figure out the battery voltage and thus no battery charge level, which is a problem in our

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

Hello there. I use Online Xanto ups'es so I did some googling for their support in nut. Turns out that... - networkupstools.org talks about an 'optiups' driver in the development version (http://www.networkupstools.org/compat/dev.html - by the way, the web page says 'stable' in the title and headings just like the actual stable one) - Andreas Thienemann seems to have a

Hi Henning, you should get in touch with Carlos, who his developing a generic megatec driver (available from svn: http://eu1.networkupstools.org/source.html) Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ OpenSource Developer -

Good morning, i have an Xanto S1000 USV the Manufactor is ONLINE USV-Systeme AG. I tried all the buildin drivers, also the driver for the driver for the Generic UPS, nothing worked for this UPS so now my question has anyone else this UPS and functional driver? Thanks and Greets Dennis

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users

Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'

Hello Nut List! I have 2 "Lacerda 10KVA" UPS that returns strange values for Q1 and F commands: Q1 (215.0 215.0 219.0 004 60.0 2.27 39.0 00000001 F #220.0 045 240.0 60.0 At least what I know about Megatec, It seems to say that it has a 240.0 V battery with currently 2.27V. Quite strange. I contacted Lacerda to help me interpret this values and they said that 2.27 is just 1 element

Dear Andreas, some googling revealed, you created a driver for the xanto series of online-usv.de. In what state it is currently? I've to manage a S2000 and would like to use nut for it, is it usable by now? Do you need another tester? TIA, Pete

NUT recently stopped working on my debian. I'm not sure which upgrade broke it. ups.conf: [mustek] driver = megatec port = /dev/ttyS0 desc = "mustek ups" # upsd -DDDD Network UPS Tools upsd 2.4.1 listen_add: added ::1:3493 listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493 setuptcp: try to bind to 127.0.0.1 port 3493 listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 setuptcp: try to bind

Hi there, A couple years ago, I had patched the "fentonups" nut driver to allow it to work with my Unitek Alpha 500 UPS. My patch had been accepted and incorporated in the standard fentonups driver. I have had no time to stay involved in the "nut" project since (and besides this I'm not a developper...). 2 days ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Gutsy to Ubuntu Hardy and got

Hi again, I tested several times using the Megatec driver from nut 2.2.2 to no avail, as it definitely never "sees" the UPS. Always getting : # drivers/megatec -DDD -a Alpha Network UPS Tools 2.2.2 - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.14 [megatec] Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2008 debug level is '3' Starting UPS detection process... Asking for UPS status [Q1]... Q1 => FAILED

Hi folks! We have a Powercom Vanguard 6000 running here. It seems to be supported by the megatec driver within nut. So I get everything out of it exept the battery status. When I run Nut, it says: Megatec protocol UPS detected [UPS Model 6K Ver Y1.3]. This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries. The "battery.charge" value will be bogus. So I would

Hello I've got an Unitek UPS (650ipE) that use megatec driver ... I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 with a 2.6.20 kernel and nut 2.0.5-1 package Ubuntu by default use Udev and "hid", "usbhid", "evdev" kernel modules are loaded automatically The UPS is detected on system level but "upsdrvctl" can't access to the device ... Does anyone could give

Hi, It took a while, but I've finally cleared my pending queue for the megatec driver and the result is the following set of patches. The changes are minor, just a couple of models to the compatibility list and a new parameter "sendpace" so that a user can change the default interval between command characters (which seems to be needed by at least one model). It builds,

2010/10/13 Vitaly Lavrov > I found bug in nut/drivers/megatec.c - force shutdown may dont work. > See patch. > could you please give a try to blazer, since it is set to replace megatec with 2.6.0. Arjen will quite probably comment on your patch usefulness within the blazer scope. thanks for your contrib. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton -

Carlos, Today I was browsing through the NUT Tracker and noticed an entry which linked to a message on nut-upsdev: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2006-January/000559.html Although the fentonups driver is no longer in the tree (since it was replaced by the megatec driver), I think there is still some merit in this patch. Notice the following lines from this message: >

Hi, a few days ago, I bought some of those Mustek UPSes that have both a serial and a USB connector. Currently only the serial port is supported by the megatec driver. This works fine so far. Now I have seen there is a megatec_usb driver, which currently only supports 2 other UPSes. How can I help to find out whether the PowerMust might actually work with the megatec_usb driver? -- Regards,