Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?"
2013 Jun 12
0
Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?
Sent this before, but it apparently got lost in the ether...
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400
Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard
> RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter?
Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port.
[snip]
> Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp
2013 Jun 11
0
Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400
Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard
> RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter?
Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port.
[snip]
> Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp
> driver.
>
If I could just see what, if anything, the
2013 Jun 11
0
Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?
On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jim Seymour wrote:
> I tried all three: bcmxcp (produced only "Receive error
> (PW_COMMAND_START_BYTE): 0!!!"), blazer_ser ("blazer_status: short
> reply") and bestups ("debug level is ..." and "Unable to detect...").
You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial
2013 Jun 10
0
Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650?
On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at LinxNet.com> wrote:
> But the manual
> also says "The Axxium Pro system communicates with your computer using
> an advanced binary protocol."
I can see that phrase being used to describe BCM/XCP.
2016 Jul 26
6
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
Hi There,
Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks!
Here's what we have:
Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS
Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu
Using OpenLDAP for authentication
Using nscd to speed things up
*Not* running winbind
*Not* running Kerberos
The problem is the company purchased a product that, *despite* the
vendor being told "We don't have
2015 Aug 31
4
Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On (was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ)
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400
Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400
> > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided
> >> one...
[snip]
> >
>
2015 Sep 08
3
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading
the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't
need two copies. Thanks!
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400
Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone
> file, I took
2016 Jul 26
2
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100
Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
> On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest.
> > Thanks!
>
> Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be
> easier to fix them.
It's a long and ugly story, which
2015 Aug 27
5
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
Hi All,
Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on
starting over.
Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So,
being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire
LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain,
anyway, I was thinking:
Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0
Set up an eth0:0
2015 Sep 08
2
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400
Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote:
>
[snip]
> >
> > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like...
> >
> > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10
[snip]
> > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain,
> >
2015 Sep 08
4
Samba AD DC, DHCP & Address Assignments
Hi All,
I should have considered this beforehand... Assumed the info would be
in the Wiki somewhere. Cannot find.
The way our LAN has been working is clients use DHCP, but all address
assignments are static. Thus, when a given PC asks "what's my
address?", the DHCP server looks at the MAC address and asks the
configured resolver what is the IP address for the hostname for that
2001 Apr 20
2
Could not load host key
Hi All,
So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started
sshd:
Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key
Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again.
This look familiar to anybody?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at:
jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html
2016 Jul 26
2
NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100
Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
[snip]
>
> I remember it now, it started last September ( see here:
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and
> it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still
> couldn't get it to work.
More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way
2015 Aug 27
6
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour:
>> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate
>> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second
>> (virtual) interface
>>
>> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com
> If
2015 Sep 03
2
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
Hi All,
Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were:
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com'
loading configuration: already exists
exiting (due to fatal error)
samba_dlz: shutting down
And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf:
zone "example.com" in {
type master;
file "named.hosts";
};
Commenting that out
2015 Sep 03
4
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100
> > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and
> >> usually
> > So if
2023 Sep 16
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 206, Issue 5
It seems the `libmodbus` library or headers were not found, or something
similar - so the driver against it was not built. Did you install
`libmodbus-dev` before the build? What does `config.log` in the build root
say (and.or the summary shown after you run the `configure` script)?
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 7:46?PM FatGear <fatgear1 at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know what
2015 Aug 27
4
Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ
On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>>>>> Hello Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am
2015 Sep 03
3
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100
Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and
> usually
So if I put the Samba AD DC in, say, "addc.example.com,"
"addc.example.com" must be the Kerberos default_realm?
> the samba DNS server (internal or bind) is just the dns
>
2023 Sep 19
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 206, Issue 5
Hello there,
I don't think that's working,?
I have done all your repo but i don't know how it's supposed to work.
I have a idea, change vendor id and product id? to make the driver try
to connect to the ups, what do you think of that ? With this driver
maybe : usbhid-ups
FatGear
Le 16/09/2023 ? 20:40, Jim Klimov a ?crit?:
> It seems the `libmodbus` library or headers were