similar to: preferred way to return expected values

Many thanks for the reply, right, this is what the discussion is about. On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:57 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > To clarify, this is a discussion around whether given some move-only type > X, implicitly convertible to Y and the code "Y func() { X x; return x; }" > is that valid in LLVM? (and, as a corollary, if the type isn't

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > FWIW, I've performed an experiment with the code below at godbolt. > (used -O2, https://godbolt.org/z/nY95nh) > > ``` > #include <vector> > #include "llvm/Support/Error.h" > > llvm::Expected<std::vector<int>> foo() { > std::vector<int> V; >

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:48 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Thanks, David! > > > Few minor additions to the topic: > > > > I'm not sure which MSVC version on godbolt would be "MSVC 2017" that > the LLVM docs refer to > > > I've found that the minimal available version of MSVC on > godbolt is "WINE MSVC 2015:

Yeah, not sure either. The discussion about minimum compatibility usually comes down to what version is available on long-term OS releases. On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:38 PM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > Is the code currently broken? > > > I don't know. Perhaps the code is fine, I did not try to compile LLVM > with all that compilers > >

Every case is different, but yes, as I said - I would like to take a closer look at the problem again, it might be the case that we don't need this complexity in this particular case, but want to double check. But yeah, in general I agree with you! On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:09 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote: > I think that pretty much hits the nail on the head.

Hi Jake, many thanks, yea, I have very similar feelings / thoughts. After some thinking it seems to me that this discussion/problem which I have brought up is, in fact, more relevant to the tools which really need a robust mutable model of an object file (like objcopy, strip, install_name_tool, etc), but the particular case of "lipo" might be simpler, I need to double check that / will

Hey everyone! Objcopy is a powerful tool that allows one to modify object files in various manners, for example, modify symbols / symbol tables or copy / remove particular parts of a binary. It also serves as a basis for the strip tool. Currently, llvm-objcopy only supports ELF files while binutils' objcopy can handle Mach-O files as well. Besides extending the existing tool to support Mach-O

*bitcode_strip* is a utility which is used to manipulate (leave / remove) bitcode segments in a Mach-O file. It is a part of Apple’s cctools and it is also distributed with Xcode. The man page of the tool is available here https://www.manpagez.com/man/1/bitcode_strip/. The functionality of *bitcode_strip* naturally maps onto llvm-objcopy’s model and requires only minimal additions to it.

Hey everyone! In October/November 2018 I started the implementation of llvm-objcopy for MachO with the long-term plan to build some popular binary-level tools on top of it. That effort stopped at the stage where some boilerplate code for reading/writing MachO files was reviewed & committed to LLVM/tools/llvm-objcopy. Later I started working on llvm-lipo (a drop-in replacing for the tool

Hey Michael, I completely agree that setting the rpath properly the first time around is much preferred. But, changes to the binary, particularly during development is much quicker. Prebuilt libraries which are being repackaged is one use case that is missed. In the past, I’ve even used it to repair am incorrectly built library which was missing the library name. There are a few different

on solaris7/sparc this device doesn't exists i can use EGD but he very big (perl script!) - in memory it take about 4mb! apache use the same! why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? what alternatives exists?

Hey everyone! Recently there has been some progress on LLVM-based tools for manipulating MachO binaries: llvm-objcopy has been gaining a lot of important bits to support MachO (it's relatively close to the point where one can implement the strip-like functionality), llvm-lipo is functional and supports most of cctools' lipo options (https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-lipo.html). There

Hi! I've added member to a queue like this, from queues.conf: member => SIP/1070@peername It works OK. But, after restaring I see in show queue that Members: SIP/1070@peername (Invalid) ... What does it mean? Why is it Invalid? BTW, reload command fixes it, so the member receives queue calls. Thanks! PS. 1.2.9.1 -- DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet

That's something I want to do as well for several reasons. That's an orthogonal issue however. On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 10:21 AM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd give some consideration to moving the objcopy support itself into a > library inside llvm (possibly lib/Object as that makes the most sense) and > then the tool is just a thin wrapper on top

ssh won't compile on this platform log: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" -DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh/ssh-askpass\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c atomicio.c -o atomicio.o In file included from config.h:294, from bsd-misc.h:39, from includes.h:91,

Hello! My name is Denis Shaposhnikov. I'm looking for a job in EU (Germany is preferably) as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Skills: * Operating systems: UNIX (FreeBSD 2.2 - STABLE), Cisco IOS (10.x - 12.x), ZyNOS. Understand how systems work and is able to apply this

Hi Ovirt node image build problem? Node image build my system OS Fedora core 14. I am have a question about installation process of oVirt project. Install DOC : https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/wiki/Build But node-image build error? [root at Ovirt-T node]# ./autobuild.sh Running oVirt Node Autobuild test -f Makefile && make -k distclean || :

See atttachment. I have already submit this bug via "report a bug" in Nov last year, but no reply, and the problem still exist in stable-6 now. Any one who knows how to solve this problem ? Thanks... -------------- next part -------------- <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

Dear all! I'd like to do multiple imputation of missing values with s-plus libraries that are provided by Shafer (http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html). I wonder, whether these libraries are compatible or somehow convertible to R (because I don't have S-plus), so that I can use this functions using the R Program. I would be happy if you could tell me, -if it is possible to use

Hi, all. I posted this message to libvir-list last night, but just realized that was geared toward development rather than support. Apologies to those who are subscribed to both for the dupe. I'm having a weird problem where libvirt/qemu/kvm won't let me use the model processor I have defined in my domain's config file. Instead, I get the error message in libvirtd.log that: