similar to: Transient failure on sanitizer-x86_64-linux

Hi Nicolai and Hal, I was wondering if your present concerns regarding the directions of the proposed attributes and semantics of the current direction had been addressed, so I thought I'd send over a friendly ping. Have they? Atmn On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:08 AM Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/8/20 9:08 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >

On 9/5/20 12:40 AM, Atmn Patel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 1:07 AM Johannes Doerfert > <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 9/4/20 7:39 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: >> > >> > On 9/4/20 6:31 PM, Atmn Patel via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> We’ve prepared a new function attribute

I will probably file a bug about this, but perhaps someone here will have some ideas. We have a problem with files being deleted instead of being saved when making changes in Microsoft Excel. The log shows an error of: 'Lock order violation'. This is with Samba 4.1.6 and happens on both Linux (2.6.25-14.fc9.i686) and Solaris 10. No such problem when running Samba 3.6.22. We have a setup

Dear Aki, I switched to "gz" now, since "zstd" also gave some errors on writing to files. I dont know if "xz" compression or "zstd" shreddered my MDBOX Files, but I lost 4 days of mail. (a couple of thousand mails). After restoring the backup (what was made after switching to version 2.3.11.3) I still have some broken mdfiles, but not too many.

Dear Aki, I switched to "gz" now, since "zstd" also gave some errors on writing to files. I dont know if "xz" compression or "zstd" shreddered my MDBOX Files, but I lost 4 days of mail. (a couple of thousand mails). After restoring the backup (what was made after switching to version 2.3.11.3) I still have some broken mdfiles, but not too many. Interestingly

I got a samba server(Linux) to store some data in my PC(windows) frequently. And last night I found that samba can't work. After logined to samba server and found that there's 91 smbd processes with status "D" totally. # ps 169 root 0 SW [pdflush] 170 root 0 DW [pdflush] .... 29534 simon 20608 D /sbin/smbd -D 29548 root 2792 D

Hi David, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on next-20200909] [cannot apply to mmotm/master hnaz-linux-mm/master xen-tip/linux-next powerpc/next linus/master v5.9-rc4 v5.9-rc3 v5.9-rc2 v5.9-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in

FYI David is referring to PGSO (profile-guided size optimization) as it exists directly under that name, see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67120. And yeah using PGSO is selecting optsize while this change is selecting optnone. On 9/9/20, 10:58 AM, "llvm-dev on behalf of Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758 Summary: Retry iptables command on transient failure Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

I want to use transient disks with libvirt. According to [1], the transient disk feature has been supported since 0.9.5. Hence, I have installed libvirt 0.9.6 for Ubuntu Lucid from [2] and used the following disk configuration: <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Good day, i writing testing system and want to use libvirt for it, now i reading libvirt development guide and found info about transient domains which looks like what i need, but it's still unclear for me if it possible to implement what i want using libvirt. my idea is to make persistent domain, prepare it for testing (install os, needed

On 11.09.2015 11:34, Mcburn wrote: > Hey at all, > > my Name is Jens-Uwe Sperling. Iám a young student in computer science. > I want install a VM for testing at home. > > i had install a VM with virt-install and the default parameters. (Number > cpu, mem etc.) > > After that i install my OS and configure it. > > Now i want work on this image in a transient way.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 11.09.2015 11:34, Mcburn wrote: > > Hey at all, > > > > my Name is Jens-Uwe Sperling. Iám a young student in computer science. > > I want install a VM for testing at home. > > > > i had install a VM with virt-install and the default parameters. (Number > > cpu, mem etc.) > >

libvirt version: 3.4.0 architecture: x86_64 ubuntu16.04-server hypervisor: kvm,qemu I call virDomainCreate create a transient vm, After a period of time ,I call virDomainDestroy, the vm configure is stil exist， the vm turn to persistent, I don't known the reason. Thanks

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:26:12AM +0200, Roman Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > In kubevirt we are running into a strange permission problem on > libvirt-5.0. We see transient "Permission Denied" errors when "virAuditSend" > wants to send an audit log. [1] shows the logs of one of these containers. > Here an example: > >

Hello all, I'm running a newly installed CentOS 5.4 KVM host and am running into problems setting guests up to autostart. Has anyone seen and/or overcome this issue? [root at virt04 ~]# virsh autostart guest02 error: Failed to mark domain guest02 as autostarted error: internal error cannot set autostart for transient domain Just for kicks I tried symlinking /etc/libvirt/guest02.xml and

... when the MUA has issued a FETCH? ? I am a Dovecot newbie ... so please bear with me if this is obvious. Basically what I am trying to do is process the mail body (in my own specific way) before Dovecot serves it up to the MUA. I want to do it as a transient operation in memory. So think of the scenario as ... ? - the MUA issues a FETCH ? - Dovecot intercepts the FETCH ? - Dovecot internally

Jamie, I hear what you're saying. I don't believe this *should* be a plugin's responsibility, though it sounds like with XMMS it is. But I don't know how to fix it. Probably with enough archaeology into the XMMS source and other plugins I could find out. I'll file it in the feature requests and hope someone can get to it. Josh --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

Hello, The Writing R extensions manual section 6.1.1 describes the transient memory allocation function R_alloc, and states that memory allocated by R_alloc is automatically freed after the .C or .Call function is completed. However, based on my understanding of R's memory handling, as well as some test functions I have written, I suspect that this is not quite accurate. If the .Call