similar to: Phabricator new review email behaviour change?

On 03/14/2017 12:11 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 03/14/2017 11:21 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 14, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com >>>> <mailto:Ashutosh.Nema at

Hello, my app is reading emails with attachments and inserting the Email message into the database to be sent to delayed job for processing. When inserting an email with attachments into the database, I get the following error: PGError: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xa0 Has anyone seen this before? There doesn''t seem to be much rails related via

It seems emails to me were not sent out due to them being held back by sendgrid spam protection. In case somebody else has this problem, this might be something to look into. Best, Tobias On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > Phab was down during the night, should be back up now. When phab is down, > emails don't get sent out (all emails get sent out

Summarizing the discussion on the implementation approaches. Discussed about two approaches, first running ‘InnerLoopVectorizer’ again on the epilog loop immediately after vectorizing the original loop within the same vectorization pass, the second approach where re-running vectorization pass and limiting vectorization factor of epilog loop by metadata. <Approach-2> Challenges with

On 03/14/2017 11:21 AM, Adam Nemet wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com >> <mailto:Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>> wrote: >> >> Summarizing the discussion on the implementation approaches. >> Discussed about two approaches, first running ‘InnerLoopVectorizer’ >> again on the epilog loop immediately after

I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at

Do you have a bounced email, we can look at for clues? > On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Ok, apple addresses still bounce without a reason - the sendgrid folks say this is completely controlled by apple.com <http://apple.com/>'s mail servers - do you have somebody you can ask? > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM Manuel

On 03/14/2017 11:58 AM, Michael Kuperstein wrote: > I'm still not sure about this, for a few reasons: > > 1) I'd like to try to treat epilogue loops the same way regardless of > whether the main loop was vectorized by hand or automatically. So if > someone hand-wrote an avx-512 16-wide loop, with alias checks, and we > decide it's profitable to vectorize the

It's actually surprising to me that the emails from Phabricator and llvm's svn *DO* get through most of the time. Both of these fabricate the "From" address to generate an email purportedly be from the author of the svn revision or phabricator comment's email address. While the message is hopefully from the real person behind that email address, those messages are decidedly

Am 05.05.2016 um 10:58 schrieb C Bergström via llvm-dev: > Sincerely and pragmatically - what do you think will be different > after this is in place.. Bureaucracy is great, but what's broken or > pandemic that you're trying to fix? From the last discussion, I gather that it's an attempt to prevent damage before it can happen. I'm quite sceptical about that. It's

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:04 AM MyDeveloper Day <mydeveloperday at gmail.com> wrote: > Out of interest are you keeping the local modifications in a fork of the > Phabricator source (llvm-phabricator)? Firstly we should be keeping any > changes we make in source control but also it's good to review those > changes. > I didn't innovate, Manuel set it up originally and

On 03/14/2017 07:50 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 03/14/2017 12:11 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 14, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >>>> <mailto:hfinkel at

I building an application using rails, and I wanna know if is possible to write a code which allows me to be notified or something like that when the user open an email sent through my application. I need to track that information. When I sent an email, I need know. The question to be answered by my app is "Did they read it?" Tips in others languages would be ok to me! Thanks in

Could we ever consider adding https://github.com/r4nt/phabricator/tree/llvm-production as a new read/only observe Diffusion repository in reviews.llvm.org? I'd be happy to do code reviews? MyDeveloperDay On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:46 PM MyDeveloper Day <mydeveloperday at gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome, thanks for sharing > > Here is a patch (based off yours) but this adds the

I understand that keeping this within one company is easiest from an organization perspective, so if Fangrui and Mehdi (and other Googlers) are able to take this on, that’s great. If not, I can raise this internally at Facebook. An estimate of the total costs incurred would be helpful for that, e.g. you mentioned Sendgrid being a couple of hundred dollars a month. Thanks, Shoaib From: llvm-dev

Hi guys, sorry the "spam", but I''ve just seen that there is a very good offer for us (ie. months of newrelic, sendgrid, heroku, linode and other cool services). You can check more here: http://tinyurl.com/35adxnv Hope that''s useful for someone (I''ve just took it) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are

On trying to run a rake task via crontab, I''m getting the following error: rake aborted! 550 Cannot receive from specified address <help-+zpghU0kKgY@public.gmane.org>: Unauthenticated senders not allowed /mnt/voylla-production/shared/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/mail-2.3.3/lib/mail/network/delivery_methods/smtp.rb:129:in `block in deliver!''

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:25 AM James Henderson < jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the work too! > > Not specifically a regression, but since the upgrade, I find it annoying > now that when I want to do something in relation to an inline comment > (collapse it, reply to it etc), I now have to click on a drop-down menu in > the comment header bar to

A secure macro It’s like static but well optimized. Any ideas how I can implement it universally? I thought about a secure application to help with compiling and security. It’s like sudo but more secure and can chain. I don’t know much about pipes and streams, but I’m pretty sure I can write it into llvm with enough time and help. Another thing, and I got trolled off gcc’s mailing list for this,

Hello there, I have been working in a startup for a few weeks now, and I am responsible for setting up the production environment and for "strengthening" the product (a rails app). By the way I''ve started reading "Deploying rails" from pragprog. The deployment of the app will be done through a private beta with about 200 members. The startup currently owns a VPS