similar to: Get errors when doing a test commit

It's out of date. We're using MCJIT on ARM to implement an OpenCL on CPU implementation. It works! On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am sorry if this question have been brought up too many times but >> the document does

On 26 November 2014 at 00:14, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote: >> We're using MCJIT on ARM to implement an OpenCL on CPU implementation. It works! > > Thanks. Great to hear that!!! > > Maybe could someone please update that page.... It's really confusing. Hi Yichao, So, MCJIT works well for x86 and PPC, and it works to a degree on ARM. Tom's team has

> We at Azul have been using invariant.start for marking objects as immutable after a certain point. > Also, upstream changes to teach relevant optimizations about invariant.start and end were added > last year. > > With respect to store to load forwarding, this is handled in GVN. I think the test cases in test/Transforms/GVN/invariant.start.ll > handle what you’re looking for.

Hi, I am sorry if this question have been brought up too many times but the document does seems a little bit confusing on this. According to the official feature page[1] ARM is not a supported target (for JIT at least...). However, according to this email[2] on the list and this related bug report[3] from earlier this year, it seems that the JIT engine is working well on ARM. Is the feature

Hi, >From LangRef, these intrinsics seems really useful for letting LLVM know about certain higher level immutability guarantee, e.g. for objects that are not allowed to be mutated after construction. However, it doesn't seem to work[1] and a quick code search suggests that there's not a single optimization pass that's currently using it for store to load forwarding, only very few

Hi, On LLVM 5.0 (current trunk), fadd/fsub and fmul that are both marked with `contract` or `fast` can be merged to a fma instruction by the backend. I'm wondering about the exact semantic of this new flag as well as `fast` and in particular, would it be valid to do this when only the `fadd`/`fsub` (and not the `fmul`) is marked with `contract` or at least `fast`. The reasoning is that doing

HI Yichao, RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer has a NotifyObjectLoaded hook that you can use to call NotifyObjectEmitted on your GDBRegistrationListener. If code is going to be unloaded we would have to add an extra hook to call NotifyFreeingObject -- that seems totally reasonable to add. -- Lang. On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote: > > What debugging

On Oct 31, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Anna Thomas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On Oct 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com<mailto:yyc1992 at gmail.com>> wrote: We at Azul have been using invariant.start for marking objects as immutable after a certain point. Also, upstream changes to teach relevant

Hi, I wanted to get the linked result in LLVM bitcode format. With LTO, this can be done by -flto -Wl,-plugin-opt,emit-llvm. Instead of generating native executables, it outputs a file with bitcode format. Does this still work with -flto=thin? -flto=thin -Wl,-plugin-opt,emit-llvm outputs a bitcode file, but its file size is too small, and does not contain all contents. What is the correct way

This release fixes a regression introduced by the security patches in 1.6.10. See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libx11/-/issues/116 for details. Alan Coopersmith (1): libX11 1.6.11 Yichao Yu (1): Fix size calculation in `_XimAttributeToValue`. git tag: libX11-1.6.11 https://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/libX11-1.6.11.tar.bz2 SHA256:

> We do not implement that restricted semantics correctly either -- see > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27190 Haha, I wondered for a minute whether I should bring up that bug... We've seen pretty nasty crashes due to it and had to work around it..... One of my recent work has also uncovered another (I believe) invalid handling of returns_twice functions....

Is 2 factor authentication possible on dovecot? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b New Brunswick Save The PRovince Vote Liberal 14 Sept!!

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:46 +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote: > El 17/04/15 a les 06:26, Fred Smith ha escrit: > > I'm trying to confirm that LDAP traffic is encrypted on my Samba 4 DC. I > > have read and followed https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_LDAPS_on_a_DC > > but when I attempt to connect to the DC on port 636 or via ldaps:// or both > > via ldapsearch (linux)

Yohoo! I have some issues with the smartd in CentOS5/x64 I edited the /etc/smartd.conf for my needs and restarted the smartd with "service smartd restart". But the start script is overriding my file. I checked it and saw the following lines: ---------------/etc/init.d/smartd------------ case "$1" in start | reload | restart) GEN_CONF="*SMARTD*AUTOGENERATED*" [ !

Hi Connor, ...The LLVM documentation has a page at > llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html > showing an example of using gdb to debug MCJIT’ed code, but has no mention > of ORC JIT. What debugging support MCJIT has is provided by the RuntimeDyld utility, which ORC shares. I would expect anything in that document to apply to ORC as well, though I haven't tested it personally.

I have looked into this and it would definitely be possible, NETunnelProvider. It was not looking like a simple port though, a lot of glue required to get it to a state Apple would approve. This had been on my list of projects to attempt if I could find the time and energy to commit to it. If you do port it I would be very interested! Regards, Ryan Mounce On 26 July 2017 at 20:54, Bright Zhao

Hi people, i have a problem with trying ldaps i use autogenerated self-signed certificate, i write in smb this: tls enabled = yes tls keyfile = tls/key.pem tls certfile = tls/cert.pem without cafile when i try to verify with: openssl verify /usr/local/samba/private/tls/myCert.pem it said me unable to verify the first certificate and if add -CApath works! and finally when i try from another

Dear all, Could you please help me how to get the output as I described in the following example? x<-c(543, 543, 543, 543, 551 , 551 ,1128 ,1197, 1197) diff<-x-lag(x) diff [1] NA 0 0 0 8 0 577 69 0 How to index the occasions in x repeatedly if the diff<15? if diff>=15, it will give a new index. I want the output be like y. y<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,3) Thank you so

Dear all, Could you please help me how to get the output as I described in the following example? x<-c(543, 543, 543, 543, 551 , 551 ,1128 ,1197, 1197) diff<-x-lag(x) diff [1] NA 0 0 0 8 0 577 69 0 How to index the occasions in x repeatedly if the diff<15? if diff>=15, it will give a new index. I want the output be like y. y<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,3) Thank you so

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 7b50567bdcad8925ca1e075feb7171c12015afd1 commit: 0737e01de9c411e4db87dcedf4a9789d41b1c5c1 ocfs2: ocfs2_mount_volume does cleanup job before return error config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230329 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230401/202304012244.gX4H4rBO-lkp at intel.com/config) compiler: