Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[Buildbots] - Looking for help with new 32 bit Windows buildbot"
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Trouble starting private llvm buildbot master.
Hongbin,
Did you tweak sys.path?
# Extend paths to allow loading zorg and config modules.
import os, sys
path = os.path.join(os.environ.get('HOME'), 'zorg', 'buildbot',
'osuosl', 'master')
if path not in sys.path:
sys.path.append(path)
path = os.path.join(os.environ.get('HOME'), 'zorg')
if path not in sys.path:
sys.path.append(path)
2012 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] Trouble starting private llvm buildbot master.
Hi,
I had cloned zorg from https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/zorg/trunk,
then I try to start the buildbot master located in buildbot/osuosl/master
(the absolute path is
/nfs/home/hongbin.zheng/buildbot/zorg/buildbot/osuosl/master) by simply
typing "buildbot start"
And I get something like this from my twistd.log:
--- <exception caught here> ---
File
2014 Dec 22
2
[LLVMdev] non-x86 sanitizer buildbots: no rule to make target check-lsan etc.
How about tweaking the compiler-rt cmakefiles so that if lsan is not
supported, the target check-lsan still exists but does nothing? I've
attached a patch that does this. (I don't know much about cmake so
there might be a better way of doing it.)
Alternatively, can I change the zorg build script so that "run
sanitizer tests in gcc build" doesn't try to run check-lsan etc
2020 Oct 08
3
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot
master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead
and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at
our end?
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang
-Andrzej
On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote:
> They are online now -
2011 Nov 19
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [zorg] r144978 - /zorg/trunk/buildbot/osuosl/master/config/builders.py
Galina,
Looks like the build bots have frozen.
Expected?
Joe
Joe Abbey
Software Architect
Arxan Technologies, Inc.
1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215
West Lafayette, IN 47906
jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com>
www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/>
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
Author: gkistanova
Date: Fri Nov 18 13:49:26 2011
New Revision: 144978
2014 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg buildbots
It looks like dragonegg should have a single buildbot using gcc 4.7.
All others would be with 4.6 and 4.5. All the 4.5 and 4.6 ones went
red since we reject those compilers now.
The 4.7 one is trying to use gcc13, which is currently offline so we
now have 0 bot coverage for dragonegg. Can we drop the 4.5 and 4.6
bots and reuse one of the manchines for 4.7? Is there documentation
somewhere on how
2016 Mar 23
0
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I think having -Werror bots is a good idea, at least when self hosting.
> Non-self-hosting -Werror (i.e. with older versions of Clang, or with GCC,
> etc.) might also be useful, but I'm less sure (since we can't fix those
> warnings if the warning is the problem).
On Tue, Mar
2016 May 27
2
[cfe-dev] Setting up a silent buildslave
I was hoping to avoid the trouble of having to setup a master buildbot.
But may be it's just easier to run Zorg as-is locally alongside the
buildslave. I'll give that a go.
Cheers,
/ Asiri
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote:
> You don't really need to use the llvm builders infrastructure, just setup
> a local jenkins (or
2014 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] non-x86 sanitizer buildbots: no rule to make target check-lsan etc.
Hi,
Currently the first stage ("run sanitizer tests in gcc build") of the
sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 buildbot is only failing because of:
+ cd clang_build
+ make -j16 check-lsan
make: *** No rule to make target `check-lsan'. Stop.
+ echo @@@STEP_FAILURE@@@
@@@STEP_FAILURE@@@
+ cd clang_build
+ make -j16 check-msan
make: *** No rule to make target `check-msan'. Stop.
+ echo
2016 May 27
0
[cfe-dev] Setting up a silent buildslave
Hi Asiri,
You can use your local master for this or use silent master.
Silent buildbot is currently copy of llvm buildbot, but does not sent any
notifications.
The both have the same set of builders and it's easy to switch a slave
between them.
To add slave/builder please add your slave and builder to zorg, but point
your slave to silent master:
use lab.llvm.org:9994 instead of
2016 Mar 23
1
[cfe-dev] New buildbot with -Werror
I just changed this build on green dragon to warn and email if warnings are found in the console log:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA_build/
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 6:24 PM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
2020 Oct 08
2
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Hi Paula,
This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x
apparently does not have that method.
The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so
so far.
That should not prevent your bot from connecting.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrzej,
>
> What are you seeing
2011 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
The host c++ standard library is missing <utility>, it appears.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Please use the correct link :
> http://63.145.236.72:8011
> and ignore the previous.
>
> Also log for broken build is here:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
>
2011 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
Please use the correct link :
http://63.145.236.72:8011
and ignore the previous.
Also log for broken build is here:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/buildslave/zorg/buildbot/osuosl/slave/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/llvm/lib/Support'
llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[1]: Compiling APInt.cpp for Release+Asserts build
In file included from APFloat.cpp:15:
In file
2020 Oct 07
4
Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good.
>
> Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new
>
2019 Jul 31
2
buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:37 AM Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I have no idea how.
> Are there particular problems? Now it should be quite.
> Console has a bunch of stale builders which are even less useful.
>
LLVM has a silent build master that does not send email. When Nico added
the gn build, apparently we promised not to set up builders
2011 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] Clang build "clang-native-arm-cortex-a9" is broken
Yeah. That code has been there since r91421 and wouldn't have failed recently otherwise. Did something change on the host?
-eric
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> The host c++ standard library is missing <utility>, it appears.
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote:
>
>> Please use the correct link :
>>
2014 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] buildbot change for Mips slave - please review
We want to switch running our slave bot with clang/llvm instead of gcc.
We have the following proposed patch. We can't test this in our
environment but will monitor and adjust if there are issues.
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/zorg/trunk zorg
mips-builder.patch
Index: buildbot/osuosl/master/config/builders.py
===================================================================
2015 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Contributing a buildbot for the BPF backend
Hello Marco,
Welcome aboard!
slaves.py keeps the build slaves definitions, builders.py keeps the
builders definitions. You have to have both.
The steps of adding a new slave is here:
http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html. Please make sure you done the
step # 10 before bringing your slave up, otherwise it wouldn't be
authorized by the master and will be blacklisted after multiple
2015 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] Contributing a buildbot for the BPF backend
Hi everyone,
I am working with Alexei Starovoitov to contribute an LLVM buildbot
for the experimental BPF backend.
I am following the steps at [1] to setup a buildbot and I was mostly
successful: I was able to setup a slave and a temporary master to
check its base config.
Now I'm not sure about the next step: patching the "slaves.py" and
"builders.py" files in zorg.
* Is