similar to: Instrument intrinsic invalid

Hello all, I would like to enhance LLVM debug info that supports setting breakpoint on labels in function. Generally, if users use GDB as their debugger, they could set breakpoints on labels in function. Following is an example. // C program static int myfunction (int arg) { int i, j, r; j = 0; /* myfunction location */ r = arg; top: ++j; /* top location */ if (j == 10) goto

LGTM. I think you can sent patch and let the ball rolling! I would like to review it. ;) 2018-03-28 10:41 GMT+08:00 Hsiangkai Wang via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hello all, > > I would like to enhance LLVM debug info that supports setting > breakpoint on labels in function. > > Generally, if users use GDB as their debugger, they could set > breakpoints on

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 27, 2018, at 7:41 PM, Hsiangkai Wang via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> I would like to enhance LLVM debug info that supports setting >> breakpoint on labels in function. >> >> Generally, if users use GDB

> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 7:41 PM, Hsiangkai Wang via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I would like to enhance LLVM debug info that supports setting > breakpoint on labels in function. > > Generally, if users use GDB as their debugger, they could set > breakpoints on labels in function. Following is an example. > > // C

Sounds good to me. You can also see llvm.codeview.annotation which does a similar thing, but it is modeled as having internal, invisible side effects. These should stay separate, but it may provide a guide for implementation. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:41 PM Hsiangkai Wang via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to enhance LLVM debug info

Dear Colleagues,   I am running a three-way mixed-design ANOVA, with one manipulated IV, a group membership IV, and pre-/post- within subject factor. I am interested in the three-way interaction effect. The regular ANVOA is problematic, because (a) the sample sizes are very unbalanced, due to the group IV, (b) the homogeneity of variance is violated, and (c) the homogeneity of covariance is also

> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Hsiangkai Wang <hsiangkai at gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with you. Attach debug metadata to basic block will be a > better solution. I will change my design to convey debug metadata > through basic block instead of intrinsic. > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D45078 In this revised design it is now possible to attach a DILabel to a

> On Mar 30, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Hsiangkai Wang <hsiangkai at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I agree with you. Attach debug metadata to basic block will be a >> better solution. I will change my design to convey debug metadata >> through basic block

Dear list, Some times I want to modify the pdf file which produced by R with illustrator. But when I use Illustrator open the pdf file, it often makes the pdf some little changed. Anyone have some suggestions? Is it better to use other file type, not pdf? Or when I produced the pdf, I should set some other parameters? Thank you

What does GCC do in situations like this? I suspect the rightiest thing to do is probably multiple DW_TAG_labels with the same name, if that's what's happened. I guess another question/possibility - what happens if some inline asm references the label? I guess it probably constrains the optimizer not to unroll? Maybe? If the label can be duplicated and inline asm can still correctly

Hello,   Anyone familiar with robust ANOVA in R? Please help.   I am conducting a between-between-within (2 X 2 X 2) ANOVA, with the focus on the significance of the three-way interaction. Because of very uneven sample sizes, and the violation of covariance homogeneity, I need to use some sort of robust ANOVA method, and I prefer bootstrap. I am aware of Rand Wilcox's robust package that can

Dear R users, I see a graph (shown athttps://cid-c486ebef16722625.photos.live.com/self.aspx/%e6%88%91%e5%96%9c%e6%ac%a2%e7%9a%84%e8%8a%b1/untitled.bmp) in a published paper, which is very informative and clear. But I don't know what type the graph is. It looks like a sactter plot but has the points with the same y values are seperate.. I really aprreciate it if someone can tell

Hi Chris, Gordon, Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it wants to insert safe points. I'm not sure who maintains the GC code today in LLVM (I'd be happy to take ownership, if needed). The patch just adds up a custom safepoints flag, similar to the way the GCStrategy can customize intrinsics lowering, or roots initialization. It works pretty well, as

LLVM Weekly - #228, May 14th 2018 ================================= If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/228>. Welcome to the two hundred and twenty-eighth issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex

Please see the following thread to get some context on this http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121564433018903&w=2 Basically the issue is that current multi-cast filtering stuff in the TUN/TAP driver is seriously broken. Original patch went in without proper review and ACK. It was broken and confusing to start with and subsequent patches broke it completely. To give you an idea of

Please see the following thread to get some context on this http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121564433018903&w=2 Basically the issue is that current multi-cast filtering stuff in the TUN/TAP driver is seriously broken. Original patch went in without proper review and ACK. It was broken and confusing to start with and subsequent patches broke it completely. To give you an idea of

Hi, if i have data in the following time series format: time, amount, state 1 2222 A 1 333 B 2 45 A 2 77 B where states could be n and time periods t is there a package in R that would calculate the transition probabilities in a markov chain. for each t except t=0 to generate A B A B perhaps the best structure might

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of