similar to: [11.0.0 Release] The release branch is here; trunk is now 12.0.0

Hello everyone, A little less than a week after rc3, the llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4 tag was just created. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc4 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become ready. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/pr46725

Hello everyone, We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc1 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as

Hello everyone, After some delay, the llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 tag was just created. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc3 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become ready. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/pr46725 Release testers:

Hello once again, A few more issues appeared, so here is yet another release candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 was just tagged. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc6 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become ready. Please file reports for any bugs you find as blockers of

Hello again, We had to pick up another bug fix, so here is another release candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5 tag was just created. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/11.0.0/#rc5 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/tag/llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5 Pre-built binaries will be added as they become ready. Please file reports for any bugs you find as blockers of

I’m happy to run them, although I’d appreciate a pointer to the appropriate documentation. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 11:15 AM To: Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear

Thanks! Added to the release page now. PR44517 is marked as wontfix. Should we re-open it? PR44518 :-( Should we add this to the list or release blockers? On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:04 PM Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Uploaded ARM & AArch64: > a60394b6508a9b66043f221f87eb4e2f5859f918f46e406b2c1e942d50ead7dc >

Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:22 PM Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2020, at 19:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged > > earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1. > > For this rc1, I used two patches, which are

FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is

But is it better or worse than IRC in this regard? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM Daniel Chapiesky via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Daniel Chapiesky <dchapiesky2 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for >

Hello everyone, The release branch for LLVM 9 and its sub-projects was just created from trunk at r366426, and the trunk version was subsequently bumped to 10.0.0. Release blockers are tracked by https://llvm.org/PR42474 Please mark any bugs, old or new, that need to be fixed before the release as blocking that. To get a change committed to the branch, first commit it to trunk as usual, and

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about

> > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, > and often intimidating for newcomers > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use > multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email > as a **mechanism** being unfamiliar/difficult/intimidating. Moving to a > new mechanism wouldn’t alter the

On 11/19/19 9:09 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: Note there is also Slack, which does not have these problems. Not sure why that keeps being overlooked My understanding is this is because Slack does not have good moderation tools. I'm unfamiliar with further details in this regard. -Hal On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at roblox.com<mailto:zturner at

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:00 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have much personal interest here - but my understanding was > that there was/is a fair bit of pushback to fragmenting the > communications channels to discord before there's a more general > buy-in to switch over across the project? (perhaps I'm misremembering > the previous

Hi all, We’ve been having discussions over the last few weeks with stakeholders both inside and outside of AMD about where we could best have a dedicated and open discussion space for topics around the AMDGPU target. The conclusion was that we’d like to try the use of a category in the LLVM Discourse group, which is mostly used for MLIR discussion so far. I have started a Discourse topic with

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote: > > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was > > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list. > > Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as >