similar to: [LNT] Build bot problems due to Python dependencies

Dear Community members, I am trying to setup *lnt* on a system where I do not have sudo access. I am facing the following issue. Kindly suggest a solution. virtualenv version => 1.11.6 OS => Debian with kernel 3.16.7 *While installing lnt into a virtual environment, I am getting the following error -* *Processing six-1.9.0.tar.gz* *Writing /tmp/easy_install-ZBhMFI/six-1.9.0/setup.cfg*

Hi, I noticed that easy_install of lnt 0.4.1dev doesn't work: # easy_install lnt==0.4.1dev Searching for lnt==0.4.1dev Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/lnt/ No local packages or download links found for lnt==0.4.1dev error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('lnt==0.4.1dev') -Gabriel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I''m looking into using puppet to deploy different python applications to different servers. I want to be able to sandbox the different applications using virtenv. A basic setup would be: 1. create user 2. install the virtual environment for that user - -> as the user: virtualenv /userdir 3. Install package dependencies. - -> as

I'd be fine pulling the pypi (sic) entry, shall I make it so? - Daniel On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:06 AM Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > Yep, we should pull that package down, or start to update it. > > The docs builds work for me. Is it possible that is not in your venv or > something like that? > > > On Jul 18, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Matthias

I updated the docs to show a pip/svn install like this: pip install svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk <svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk> > On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > >> On 18 Jul 2017, at 20:21, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org <mailto:daniel at zuster.org>> wrote:

Hi, working on the LNT documentation I am wondering about a few things: - LNT documentation recommends to do `easy_install lnt==0.4.2dev` (in the install box on the left side of the title page). The last available version of LNT on pypy is version 0.4.0 from 2012. Are there plans to keep this up to date or should we better remove the entry and not mention pypy packages anymore? - Building the

Anyone familiar with this? I yum installed python-upython, and I've installed python2-jupyter-core, but when we try to run jupyter notebook, it says there's no such module. So I try to pip install notebook, I get Collecting ipython>=4.0.0 (from ipykernel->notebook) Downloading

Hello, as discussed here in more detail: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81583 the introduction of the C++20 [[no_unique_address]] attribute exposes an ABI issue on platforms that require special handling for structs/classes that are "equivalent" to a single floating-point member (or in some cases, a "homogeneous" set of floating-point members). This is because we can now for the

I'm trying to install Review Board (http://review-board.org) with python-setup tools and "sudo easy_install ReviewBoard", but this fails as follows: easy_install ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Best match: ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081202 Processing ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081202-py2.4.egg ReviewBoard 0.9.dev-20081202 is already the active version in easy- install.pth

I've some trouble with installing numpy in python 3.3 on Centos 6.8 as installation request a different python version... [root at sge ~]$ yum install python33 python33-python-tools [root at sge ~]$ scl enable python33 bash ===== *this load Python 3.3.2* === [root at sge ~]$ easy_install pip [root at sge ~]$ pip install numpy Collecting numpy Using cached numpy-1.12.0.zip

Hello, As I am using markdown to write documentation, I am often tempted to make links to terms in definition lists. Since this is not possible for now (at least in php markdown extra), I was wondering if this could be a common addition in major implementation supporting definition lists. the syntax would be term {#id} : definition This syntax tries to follows current convention and

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:13, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Anyone familiar with this? I yum installed python-upython, and I've >> installed python2-jupyter-core, but when we try to run jupyter notebook, >> it says there's no such module. So I try to pip install notebook, I >> get Collecting ipython>=4.0.0 (from

Hi, I am stuck on upgrading the current Samba3 to Samba4, currently used Samba 3.3.10 and upgraded to Samba 3.4.17 still the same problems below. I also try to upgrade the Python 2.4.3 to Python 2.7 still same problems, with the OpenLDAP 2.3.43. [root at ewanko]# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=ewanko.local

Hello, I am developing an application which is Python based and uses LLVM. I use LLVM by generating textual bitcode files and feeding them to my plug-in. I wish LLVM had Python binding. I would love to see Python binding as one of the GSoC projects so someone from the community can pick it up. Cheers, Nadav

Andrew Kaylor wrote: >In general, the current "strict FP" handling stops at instruction >selection. At the MachineIR level we don't currently have a mechanism >to prevent inappropriate optimizations based on floating point >constraints, or indeed to convey such constraints to the backend. >Implicit register use modeling may provide some restriction on some

Oh, and other thing: Are you planning to attend the upcoming LLVM developer's meeting in Bristol? I thought it might be good idea to get all parties interested in this feature together in person, if we're at the same meeting anyway. So I was thinking of submitting a proposal for a BoF session on this topic ... Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Ulrich Weigand -- Dr. Ulrich

Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote on 11.12.2012 12:48:55: > On 10.12.2012, at 15:19, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> wrote: > > Maybe I'm confused somehow, but I thought this one: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2 > > does bootstrap and then run both LLVM and Clang tests (successfully): > >

On 10.12.2012, at 15:19, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> wrote: > Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but >> not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion >> failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why: >> the Clang

On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 13:45 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote on 11.12.2012 12:48:55: > > On 10.12.2012, at 15:19, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > Maybe I'm confused somehow, but I thought this one: > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2 > > > does

Hi Hal, I only just noticed that about a year ago, Jim removed CPU auto-detection for the X86 target: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-April/071991.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140407/212676.html >Currently the X86 backend does CPU auto-detection and subtarget feature >detection when the TargetMachine is created if no explicit CPU was