similar to: Function name demangling in llvm ir

(though, usual caveat: you /usually/ shouldn't be doing that - instead relying only on whatever semantics the IR actually carries, rather than implying extra semantics based on the demangled name) On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:48 PM Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have not tried it but maybe > > `std::string llvm::demangle(const

I am sorry to not make my question clear. My question is how this value is calculated without having fadd and fsub in IR? On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Neither 1e16 or 1e16+1 can be accurately represented in a double. The > largest integer than be accurately represented is 2^53. As the number gets > larger floating sacrifices

Do you pull clang under llvm/tools and compile it as well? In theory, if `opt` recognize the option, so does `clang -mllvm`. 2018-01-12 8:47 GMT+08:00 sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I have tried giving this option like this > > clang -c -emit-llvm -mllvm -rdetector hello.c -c -o hello.bc > but I am getting error " Unknown command

This is of course not homework. I am trying to understand how fast math optimizations work in llvm. When I compared IR for both the programs, the only thing I have noticed is that fdiv and fmul are replaced with fdiv fast and fmul fast. Not sure what happens in fdiv fast and fmul fast. I feel that its because d/max is really small number and fast-math does not care about small numbers and consider

Hello, I have followed steps given in - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693 <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29910051/integrating-llvm-passes/48142693#48142693>, to integrate my pass with pass manager and run it with clang. I am able to run my pass with opt - opt -mypass but when I try to run it with clang, I always get an error -

Hello, LLVM IR flattens out the structure with one integer element to i32. Is there any way to disable this? I want to preserve the type information of the structure. I tried compiling the program with O0, it maintains the type for most of the instructions but for all. Regards, Sangeeta -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have below code in C - int main() { double x,y; x = 1e16; y = (x + 1) - x; printf("y:%e\n", y); return 0; } llvm bitcode looks like this for this function - ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable define dso_local i32 @main() local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %call = tail call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8], [4 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64

Hello, I am working on creating a llvm pass which clones a certain function with a different name using CloneFunctionInto. I create a call instruction to call a new cloned function from the old function. In llvm IR and in .s file everything looks as expected, but when I call this program with gdb and set a breakpoint on this new function, gdb shows the name of the original function. I know it has

On 14 Jan 2018, at 00:14, sangeeta chowdhary <sangitachowdhary at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example. The SimplePass example is intended to be built out of tree, so I’ve no idea what happens if you

Hello, I am trying to create a call to a function which returns a struct in llvm pass. I also want to read struct fields returned from this function call. Can somebody help me with this? Regards, Sangeeta

I have taken SimplePass and added in Transform directory, “libLLVMSimplePass.a” is built but I can not see this pass in opt —help. I don’t even see the name of pass while registering it in the example. > On Jan 13, 2018, at 7:35 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 13 Jan 2018, at 03:45, Craig Topper via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Hello All, I am instrumenting IR to pass addres of the function to runtime but I am getting error - Instruction does not dominate all uses. I used M.dump() to get below dump, not able to figure out what I am doing wrong. Any help would be much appreciated. define dso_local double @mysqrt(double %val1) local_unnamed_addr #0 { entry: %0 = bitcast double (double)* @mysqrt to i8* %1 = call

can you please describe a bit more about the steps taken to clean up and re-configure gluster? Regards, Vijay On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sangeeta Ramapure < sangeeta.ramapure at globallogic.com> wrote: > Kindly somebody help me with this issue. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Sangeeta Ramapure > > > > *From:* Sangeeta Ramapure

Kindly somebody help me with this issue. Thanks & Regards, Sangeeta Ramapure *From:* Sangeeta Ramapure [mailto:sangeeta.ramapure at globallogic.com] *Sent:* June 09, 2017 4:41 PM *To:* 'gluster-users at gluster.org' *Cc:* 'devarajan at ericsson.com' *Subject:* After gluster clean up sub directories becomes invisible Hi Team, After performing the gluster clean up

Hello! We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable of that, and if yes, are there any plans to add it? Depending on something like libiberty.a doesn't seem like a

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > Hello! > > We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer > testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. > I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ > names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable

On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hello! > > We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. > I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable > of that, and if yes, are there any

On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer >> testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. >> I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer > > testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. > > I've noticed that llvm-nm

Hi Team, After performing the gluster clean up and again doing gluster configuration the sub directories become invisible. Even after they are present the directories are invisible. If I create a new directory by the same name it will say the directory already exists. Thanks & Regards, Sangeeta Ramapure -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: