similar to: Failing build

Hi, If I used drop1 in a weighted lm fit, it seems to ignore the weights in the AIC calculation of the dropped terms, see the example below. Can this be right? Yan -------------------- library(car) > unweighted.model <- lm(trSex ~ (river+length +depth)^2- length:depth, dno2) > Anova(unweighted.model) Anova Table (Type II tests) Response: trSex Sum Sq Df F value

This is what I would like to do and it works just fine. Is there a way to shorten this code so I don't have to subset a subset of a subset? d<-subset(subset(subset(subset(x, River.Mile<=202), River.Mile>3), Lagrangian=="Yes"), EventType=="Regular") Stephen -- Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that

I would like to do the following in ggplot: what am I missing? River.Mile <-c(202, 198, 190, 185, 179, 148, 119, 61) TSS <- c(1:8) DOC <- seq(2, by= 0.6, length.out=8) z <- data.frame(River.Mile, TSS, DOC) xyplot(TSS+DOC~River.Mile, data=z, auto.key=TRUE) thanks -- Stephen Sefick Research Scientist Southeastern Natural Sciences Academy Let's not spend our time and resources

I'd like to use native moh instead of with mpg123... for some reason the processes never bloody die. For native moh to not spawn an external player, I'd need to convert the default supplied moh sound files in /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3 to ulaw and g729 format. Anyone know of a free, easy way to convert them? Thanks, Doug.

I'd be interested in using this but I have to wait until someone ports this to firefox (or at least chromium). Thanks for sharing it though! On 3/31/20 2:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev wrote: > For those interested I've uploaded to the chrome store to make installs > easier. An install link is now included on the repo. > > -- River > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 1:44 PM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, i''m trying to use the nfsv3 provider on S10U6, with the following simple script: #! /usr/sbin/dtrace -s #pragma D option quiet nfsv3:::op-read-start { printf("%s\n", args[1]->noi_curpath); } however, when running it, i get the following error: dtrace: failed to compile script ./nfs2.d: line 5: failed to grab

Hi, I'm using the "ncdf" library for creating ncdf files. But I need to create about 100 variables per file (e.g. single rivers), So I do not like to create each variable separately. Unfortunately I found no way to make this work, as I'm unable to create a correct list of class "var.ncdf". ###code piece river=list(mode='var.ncdf', length=nriv)

Dear R users, I face to a nested pattern and despite the numerous examples in the help I am still confused. I sampled bugs in different habitats within sites which were within rivers themselves within different regions. The habitat correspond to different substrata (not systematically present in all sites). For rivers and sites, I have environemental variables (e.g. altitude and slope of

I would like to be able to do the xyplot in ggplot below. I read in the archive that Hadley was working on this for the next release, and I can not find the documentation (Aug. 23rd). River.Mile <- c(215 ,202, 198, 190, 185, 179, 148, 119, 61) Cu <- rnorm(9) Fe <- rnorm(9) Mg <- rnorm(9) Ti <- rnorm(9) Ir <- rnorm(9) r <- data.frame(River.Mile, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ti, Ir) z <-

2017-07-24 16:14 GMT-07:00 Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi River, > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 2:36 PM, River Riddle <riddleriver at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > I appreciate the feedback. When I reference the cost of Target Hooks it's > mainly for maintainability and cost on a target author. We want to keep the >

Dear Colleagues, I am attempting to develop an optimization routine for a river suspended sediment mixing model. I have Calcium and Magnesium concentrations (%) for sediments from 4 potential source areas (Topsoil, Channel Banks, Roads, Drains) and I want to work out, based on the suspended sediment calcium and magnesium concentrations, what are the optimal contributions from each source area to

Hi all, Recently I've had some extra time on my hands, so I spent part of the weekend coding up a simple chrome extension to monitor the status of code reviews on the LLVM phabricator instance. This extension is inspired by some other review monitoring tools that I've used in the past. It allows for monitoring revisions that a user needs to review, revisions by the user that need to be

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 9:24 AM, Jessica Paquette <jpaquette at apple.com> wrote: > >> The two passes are pretty different in their approaches to congruency finding, so I don't think it helps to group them as though they were interchangeable "outliner technology". The two passes might be totally orthogonal. > > I think that based off how River described his

Hi Quentin, I appreciate the feedback. When I reference the cost of Target Hooks it's mainly for maintainability and cost on a target author. We want to keep the intrusion into target information minimized. The heuristics used for the outliner are the same used by any other IR level pass seeking target information, i.e TTI for the most part. I can see where you are coming from with

Hi River, Thanks for the detailed explanation. If people are okay for you to move forward, like I said to Andrey, I won’t oppose. I feel sad we have to split our effort on outlining technology, but I certainly don’t pretend to know what is best! The bottom line is if people are happy with that going in, the conversation on the details can continue in parallel. > On Jul 24, 2017, at 4:56 PM,

hi all, I often have a data frame like this example data.frame(sq=c(1,1,1,2,2,3,3,3,3),area=c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3),habitat=c("garden","garden","pond","field","garden","river","garden","field","field")) for each "sq" I have multiple "habitat"s each with an associated "area". I

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi River, > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 2:36 PM, River Riddle <riddleriver at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > I appreciate the feedback. When I reference the cost of Target Hooks it's > mainly for maintainability and cost on a target author. We want to keep the

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 6/25/14, 5:15 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > > In a recent review via Phabricator, I was receiving bounce notifications for > mail being sent to llvm-commits because of "Too many recipients to the > message", even though I am a subscriber. I wonder how common is that. > > >

Hi Andrey, Questions and feedback are very much welcome. - The explanation as to why the improvements can vary between the IR and MIR outliner mainly boil down to the level of abstraction that each are working at. The MIR level has very accurate heuristics and is effectively the last post ISel target independent code gen pass. The IR outliner on the other hand has more estimation in the cost

Hello I have lots of folders of individual Scottish river catchments on my uni One Drive. Each folder is labelled with the river name eg "Tay" and they are all in a folder named "Scotland" I want to list the folders on One Drive so that I can cross check that I have them all against a list of folders on my laptop. Can I somehow use list.files() - I've tried various things