similar to: RFC: throw2goto exception optimization

Yes I'm looking for either community approval or reasons I might be barking up the wrong tree :) Maybe someone else explored this idea and there's some big roadblock. I would like to contribute myself, and there may be others like Emil who want to help. I just wanted to let you all know what I want to optimize since I've never contributed to clang before (sorry I don't have

Hello LLVM devs, I would like to start a project to optimize exception handling in clang. If anyone in interested in helping, please let me know. Thanks, Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200426/fe396fa3/attachment.html>

Hi all, I updated http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Status and tracked meeting minutes at http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/2014-May20-notes Lars

Hi all, Attention: Lang Hames I am developing the nGraph MLIR<https://github.com/NervanaSystems/ngraph/tree/master/src/contrib/mlir> implementation and hitting the following assert while running nGraph unit tests: assert(ObjectBufferMap.find(K) == ObjectBufferMap.end() && "Second attempt to perform debug registration."); Here is a

Hey everyone, Basically, I'm trying to figure out if I can configure sshd to require that the user has a key that has been signed by a trusted user CA *and* is listed separately as an authorised key (or the user has a signed key and a different authorised key)? The closest I've come is having an `authorized_keys` file have two entries consisting of the CA key and a normal key with

Hi, I have just tagged the 10.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If you still want to get a fix into the 10.0.1 release, you still have about a month to get your fix in. To request a patch be backported to the release/10.x branch, file a bug and mark it as a blocker of the release-10.0.1 meta bug. -Tom

Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of clarifications, which are things we are currently doing that aren't documented. The second is a list of changes which would actually modify how releases are currently managed.

What is the best way to upgrade a production asterisk box? make upgrade? I don't want my configs messed with, and need the process to go as smooth as possible. I fetched and built a new kernel last night, but haven't rebooted into it. I'll do that tonight, and then want to quickly upgrade to the latest asterisk (mainly for zttest.) Does make upgrade fetch head? Thanks Nik

In summary we have no less than six patches required to support Win64 SEH MinGW. The first five could be committed after review and LGTM but the last one also requires Ray Donnelly approval. Please comment in the Phabricator so the comments would be kept in context. 'unreachable' trap http://reviews.llvm.org/D3417 Win64 SEH (LLVM) http://reviews.llvm.org/D3418 Win64 SEH (clang)

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 4 May 2015 at 21:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. > > There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from > > code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before > > the

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about

I have time-series data on approval ratings of British Prime Ministers. The prime ministers dating from MacMillan onward till today are coded as dummy variables and the approval ratings are entered for each month. I want to know the mean value of the approval rating of each Prime Minister in the dataset and the approval rating during his/her first month and last month as PM. What R code should

Hi everyone, I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the process. The developer policy states: "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get approval, submit a patch <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you may commit it

Hi, I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before the start of 'official' testing. We had originally planed to start 'official' testing today, however a regression was found in the 3.6 branch, so I would like to

Thanks to both! I'll update the docs. Best, Stefanos Στις Κυρ, 1 Μαρ 2020 στις 5:24 μ.μ., ο/η Florian Hahn < florian_hahn at apple.com> έγραψε: > Hi, > > > On 1 Mar 2020, at 14:44, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the > process. > The

I have started to read r-help on Gmane using Thunderbird as a reader. Before that I had messages sent to gmail account. The first post through Gmane needed moderator approval, but then I got a message from Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org saying You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.r.general newsgroup. But my messages are still needing moderator approval, which I

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

Hi Hal, > Documentation updates should also be reviewed. Of course, I meant that I'll open a patch in Phabricator. :) I didn't know about code-review patch, thanks. I'll defer the update of developer policy until the other patch is committed so we can have a clearer picture. Kind regards, Stefanos Στις Κυρ, 1 Μαρ 2020 στις 6:17 μ.μ., ο/η Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>

Hi When I make a call from the outside to asterisk and the call is asnwered, all is OK, but when I make a call from the outside to asterisk and hangup before the call is answered, you got this WARNING in the console: Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521 ast_read: Exception flag set on 'UniCall/2-1', but no exception handler Jul 6 19:33:08 WARNING[10037]: channel.c:1521

Hello, I'm researching the possibility of using VOIP (SIP) with an existing PABX system. Ideally, the setup would be to dial an outside line through the PABX (that would actually link to the the VOIP gateway). At this point I would prefer not to purchase a hardware-based VOIP gateway. I would prefer to use a software-based gateway for research & testing purposes. Could anyone please