similar to: Issues porting intrinsics to LLVM 10

Hi Leslie, On 20 December 2017 at 10:51, Leslie Zhai via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Sorry, I am apprentice of lowRISC, and meet new bug when porting GlobalISel > to RISCV target > https://github.com/xiangzhai/llvm/commit/b3f91ea54d9fee0ef7e73a32c6b8456bbe252811 > > > In file included from >

Each of the main TableGen files for the supported targets includes include "llvm/Target/Target.td" In turn, Target.td includes include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td" The final lines of Instrinsics.td are include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicsPowerPC.td" include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td" include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicsARM.td" include

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Hello, I have a problem with pattern matching on intrinsics. I have following code in IntrinsicsX86.td: ``` let TargetPrefix = "x86" in { // All intrinsics start with "llvm.x86.". def int_x86_mpx_bndmk: Intrinsic<[llvm_x86bnd_ty], [llvm_ptr_ty, llvm_i64_ty], []>; } ``` And following instruction that is generated when @llvm.x86.mpx.bndmk is used in code:

Dear R Users, R Core Team, I have a two dimensional space where I measure a numerical value in two situations at different points. I have measured the change and I would like to test if there are areas in this 2D-space where there is a different amount of change (no change, increase, decrease). I don´t know if it´s better to analyse the data just with the coordinates or if its better to group them

Hi, For PR21780 solution, I plan to add a new functionality to restore memory operations that was once deleted, in this particular case it is the load operations that were deleted by InstCombine, please note that once the load was removed there is no way to restore it back and that prevents us from vectorizing the shuffle operation. There are probably more similar issues where this approach could

The first patch seems fine, though the comment on the modified addDIEEntry function is a bit confusing: -/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. +/// addDIEEntry - Add a DIE attribute data and value. The form should be +/// a reference form: ref1, ref2, ref4, ref8, ref_udata, ref_addr, +/// or ref_sig8. A form can be chosen inside addDIEEntry. When the comment says "The form

Hi Michael, >Interesting approach but how do you handle more complex offsets, e.g., when the pointer is part of an aggregate? Only one offset does not seem enough to handle generic cases. Yes, correct, this a little bit changed example is not working. #include <x86intrin.h> __m256d vsht_d4_fold(const double* ptr, unsigned long long i) { __m256d foo = (__m256d){ ptr[i], ptr[i+1],

FYI, The CRC64 intrinsics were renamed to CRC32 since there is no such thing. See below for details. Chad On May 26, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Chad Rosier wrote: > Author: mcrosier > Date: Thu May 26 18:13:19 2011 > New Revision: 132163 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=132163&view=rev > Log: > Renamed llvm.x86.sse42.crc32 intrinsics; crc64 doesn't exist.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > David, > > Thanks for reviewing! > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: >> >> 0001: >> This patch generally, while separated for

I have a variadic intrinsic that is defined as something like this: def int_foobar : Intrinsic<[llvm_anyint_ty], [llvm_vararg_ty], [IntrNoMem, IntrSpeculatable]>; When I construct a call to the above intrinsic with IRBuilder::CreateIntrinsic, it mangles the intrinsic name with the return type (i64) and the actual argument

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> David, >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing!

Dear list, I am trying to download a text file from an ftp site using download.file(). I used the following code: url <- "ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/data/snow/snow_course/table/history/idaho/13e19.txt" dest <- "c:/test/downloadtest.txt" download.file(url, dest) I get this error message, indicating that R is unable to open the connection: trying URL

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Might be easier if

Good morning, I am currently trying to download R and RStudio to my MacOS 13.3 as it is a requirement for a statistics class I am taking this semester. I have checked and I have plenty of storage available however after the downloading process is complete and I go to install the program this error pops up: The installation failed. The Installer encountered an error that caused the installation to

I have a question about the SSE scalar convert intrinsics. cvtsd2si is defined thusly: def int_x86_sse2_cvtsd2si64 : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_ia32_cvtsd2si64">, Intrinsic<[llvm_i64_ty, llvm_v2f64_ty], [IntrNoMem]>; This matches the signature of the GCC intrinsic. The fact that the GCC intrinsic has a type mismatch on the input (vector rather than scalar) is

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at

Hi Michael, >I have a case where InstCombine removes a store and your approach would be >valuable for me if the entire access to an aggregate could be restored. Yes, no problem and we could add the aggregate pointer to this new intrinsic and in my particular case I should ignore it, but I am looking now at "speculation_marker" metadata and I am still not sure how to implement it

Hi I have "observations" obs <- (11455, 11536, 11582, 11825, 11900, ...) and a simulation function f(A,B,C,D,E,F), so sim <- f(A,B,C,D,E,F) e.g. sim = c(11464, 11554, 11603, 11831, 11907, ...) now I would like to fit A,B,C,D,E,F such that "obs" and f(A,B,C,D,E,F) match as well as possible. A,..,F should be integers and have bounds. How would you solve this problem

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at