similar to: [GSoC] Unify ways to move code or check if code is safe to be moved

Hi Rithik, CodeMoverUtils is not aimed for only loop transformations, it can be used by any transformation which want to move code or check if code is safe to be moved. It can currently do both hoist and sink but require control flow equivalent between the original location and the intended to be moved location. I would like to keep the API decoupled from loop, so other transformation can use it.

Np, good luck! :) - Stefanos Στις Τρί, 24 Μαρ 2020 στις 8:55 μ.μ., ο/η RITHIK SHARMA < rithiksh02 at gmail.com> έγραψε: > Many thanks, Stefanos! I really appreciate your help :) I heard from > Whitney. > > Best, > Rithik > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 23:08, Stefanos Baziotis < > stefanos.baziotis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rithik, >> >> I

Hello, I am an undergrad from India. This summer I'm interested in working on unifying the code motion checks as a GSoC intern with LLVM. I started reading about classical data flow analysis since few months, I see this as a great opportunity to start contributing to LLVM. The idea of unifying all the code motion checks into one place seems very rational and interesting to me. As in the

Hi, I would like to give a quick update on what my current design and implementation go like. Basically, the `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` is now modified to a generic version `FunctionToLoopUnitPassAdaptor`, which allows re-using the existing codes to implement `FunctionToLoopNestPassAdaptor`, with the help of additional metadata associated with `Loop` and `LoopNest`. Both

Hi Rithik, I CC'd the 2 other mentors and hopefully you'll get answer. Sorry, but I don't know of any other way to help. :/ You may also try to contact them privately. Best, Stefanos Στις Τρί, 24 Μαρ 2020 στις 7:35 μ.μ., ο/η RITHIK SHARMA via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> έγραψε: > Ping! > I'm bit concern about the approaching deadline next week, some

Hi, Thanks for your help! I've checked the sources that you mentioned. Currently, I think that I would need to implement a FunctionToLoopNestPassAdaptor which is essentially the same as the FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor but operates only on LI.getTopLevelLoops(). We might also need a LNPMUpdater (LoopNestPassManagerUpdater) which disallows adding inner-loops back into the pipeline, and

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt" ><div dir="ltr" ><font face="AppleSystemUIFont" size="3" >LoopUnrollAndJamPass is currently a loop pass. It is added in a LPM with only itself.</font><br><font face="AppleSystemUIFont"

Hi, I'm a college student who is quite new to the community and is interested in contributing to the LLVM project. Although I haven't applied to GSoC, I notice that the project "Create LoopNestPass" seems to be unassigned. So I'm curious whether anyone is currently working on it, and if not, is it possible for me to work on it as a side-project? I've been programming in

I have just installed Samba on RedHat Linux 6.2 which is working fine. However, I've noted that for every 20 minutes, the following error message being logged under log.nmb, [2001/04/17 14:29:27, 0] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_ fail(362) find_domain_master_name_query_fail: Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name HOME<1b> for the workgroup HOME. Unable

Hi all, I have some machines running FreeBSD and dovecot deployed. User's home dir is on NFS mount and I've found that dovecot only works with dotlock file locking mechanism, fcntl and flock failed. Now it causes problem with thunderbird (thunderbird is cachine connections) waiting forever and I noticed that dovecot is trying to acquire a lock but unsuccessful since the lock file is in

Hi all, If you are using the kernel divider= option in your vmware quest, you are probably aware of the bugs reported at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315471 Someone @redhat "confirmed" the fix is in the test kernel -92. I tried it but it seems to have the same problem as before - when used with clocksource=pit, it hangs on bootup. Wonder if some of you can test this

Hi everyone, Does anyone know of a way to log SQL statements (but without the SELECT queries)? I would like to keep track of the changes made to the database, but I don''t want the log file to be flooded with SELECT statements (I am using the default logger at debug level). Is it possible to do that with the rails logger? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Dear Sir, I am comparing two samples using wilcox.test in R. Literature appears to describe mann whitney u test as the most appropriate test to use on my data. is the wilcox.test function equivalent to mann-whitney u? Is there a way to gain the U-value as apposed to the W-value in R? Thank you

Hi all, I am planning to use dovecot IMAP on my server. Currently it is running UW-IMAP server with Maildir format storing users' mail. I've found that dovecot uses different Maildir format from UW-IMAP. Is there any configuration option for adapting dovecot to use format used by UW-IMAP? Thanks a lot. Tony.

Hi, Could someone please tell me how to perform a Mann-Whitney U test on a dataset with 2 groups where one group has more data values than another? I have split up my 2 groups into 2 columns in my .txt file i'm using with R. Here is the code i have so far... group1 <- c(LeafArea2) group2 <- c(LeafArea1) wilcox.test(group1, group2) This code works for datasets with the same number

Hi, This seems simple but I cant get it to work... I have a table with 4 or 5 columns and 20-30 rows. I''d like to have the ability to click anywhere in a particular row to fire an action, such as bringing up a "Details" page for the clicked row. This would eliminate the need to generate a "Details" link at the end of every row, which is what I have now and looks

Hi, I know that I can perform a Mann-Whitney U test with wilcox.test(x,y) But instead of an U-value I get a W-Value. Is it possible to change this?

Hi all, I've a dovecot server setup and occassionally clients cannot get mails from their inbox. When I inspect the maildir for that user, there is stale dovecot-uidlist.lock file, and imap process keeps waiting for release of the lock. Is there any other method to perform locking on dovecot-uidlist instead of using dotlock mechanism? It is creating maintenance problems if I need to remove

Given this example #start code a<-c(0,70,50,100,70,650,1300,6900,1780,4930,1120,700,190,940, 760,100,300,36270,5610,249680,1760,4040,164890,17230,75140,1870,22380,5890,2430) b<-c(0,0,10,30,50,440,1000,140,70,90,60,60,20,90,180,30,90, 3220,490,20790,290,740,5350,940,3910,0,640,850,260) wilcox.test(a, b, paired=FALSE) #sum of rank for first sample sum.rank.a <-

Hi, I have a statistical question. To apply the Mann Whitney test to compare a pair of vectors, they must to have the same length ? Thanks, Rodrigo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]