similar to: [RFC] Being explicit in the cost model

You're being quite vague about what the extra state is. Is this because you haven't yet settled on what it should be, or do you actually intend to let it be a template parameter: template <typename T> struct Cost { unsigned Val; T State; } Thanks, Christopher Tetreault From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of David Sherwood via llvm-dev Sent:

Makes sense. I personally greatly prefer having a type rather than a `static constexpr int CostUnfathomable = 10000`. I think the type should have arithmetic operators defined such that an "invalid cost" on either side results in an invalid cost (similar to how NaN infects floats), and an implicit conversion that constructs a valid cost. Then I could just do: ``` Cost c = 7; // c is a

It might also make sense to have functions that return costs for vector ops return some sort of `LinearPolyBase` with `ScalarTy` being `InstructionCost`. From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Vineet Kumar via llvm-dev Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 11:24 PM To: David Sherwood <David.Sherwood at arm.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re:

We''re trying to figure out how to have equal cost multipath routing using OSPF (quagga) and have come up with the following... Has anyone done something similar? -- How do you deal with incoming services (mail/web/etc) in such a scenario as below - And does anyone have any suggestions? There''s more detail below.... Diagram and overview: Network A connects to Core1 and Core2

Hi, I have a question regarding the cv.glm function in the package boot. What is exactly the cost? Is it the threshold value for an estimated value to be classified as either 0 or 1? I have troubles understanding the explanation in R. Lets say I want all estimations >0.65 to be classified as 1s and <0.35 as 0s, how do I write that? And if the cost is something else, how do I set the

I have a logistic model fitted with the following R function: glmfit<-glm(formula, data, family=binomial) A reasonable cutoff value in order to get a good data classification (or confusion matrix) with the fitted model is 0.2 instead of the mostly used 0.5. And I want to use the `cv.glm` function with the fitted model: cv.glm(data, glmfit, cost, K) Since the response in the fitted

mboost contains a blackboost method to build tree-based boosting models. I tried to write my own "cost-sensitive" ada family. But obviously my understanding to implement ngradient, loss, and offset functions is not right. I would greatly appreciate if anyone can help me out, or show me how to write a cost-sensitive family, thanks! Follows are some families I wrote ngradient <-

Hello, does anyone know of a good calling card solution for asterisk that is able to do lcr? Does astcc do this? I've been searching around and I can find some lcr modules/apps but none that incorporate prepaid card functionality. Regards, Igor H.

We need an expert in least cost routing (LCR) for an Asterisk project. Please provide references and a resume of your experience. Contact us at voip3@nibble.net.

PCB123 is the perfect design software for schools, universities & institutions. It's free, easy to use, and a fun way to learn about the entire circuit board process. http://www.pcb123.com?src=edu Here's what you get: - Free schematic & layout design software - Quote your boards as you design - Easily order circuit boards from within the program - 10% Education discount* *Note:

Hi , everybody !!! I want to perform a cost-sensitive classification using the rpart as a base classifier . Is it possible ? Nissim -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Cost-sensitive-classification-tp3668749p3668749.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear R Users, nofrills (0.2.0) has been published on CRAN: https://cran.r-project.org/package=nofrills This lightweight package provides `fn()`, a compact variation of the usual syntax of function declaration, in order to support tidyverse-style quasiquotation of a function?s arguments and body. Aside from enabling a shorter but fully general syntax for function declarations, the main benefit

On Jan 10, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Renato Golin Linaro <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > I'm also thinking about the individual instructions cost (getArithmeticInstrCost, getShuffleCost, etc). That can be a simple and easily parallelized task. I got the A9 manual that has the cost of all instructions (including NEON and VFP), that should give us a head start. Renato, Thanks for

On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:36 AM, Renato Golin Linaro <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 January 2013 23:00, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Some of the costs for the arithmetic operations should be handled automatically by the BasicTTI (which asks TartetLowering if the type and operations are legal). We need to have cost tables for things like "trunk <4 x

Thanks Matt! So, just to make sure I understand, what is getting a specific TTI in llc triggered off? -mcpu? On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matthew Simpson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Adam Nemet via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Do we need a new (loop-vectorizer-specific) command

> Chris, > > I believe it would be nice to send the info also to the list. So > others would be able to benefit as well. You've got at least 2 people > interested :) > > Marconi. Ok, I just wasn't sure because it's more of an 802.3Q/Routing issue rather than an * issue, but if everyone's cool with it I sure will... I'm not the only one who knows this

Greetings. I've been playing with the TrollPhone Rate Engine Addon for a week or so. I'm curious what is being used out there for LCR applications? I've run into a stump with the Rate Engine and that is the costing is done with an integer. With this, how do you put in say 0.014 / minute rate. And if your periods are not 60 seconds.. well.. then you have even more places to

Hello List. I am setting up asterisk as a central dialplan, voicemail and conference solution, connected to 12 Cisco 1760 Routers running Call Manager Express IOS distributed around the world. This is all done over VPN. These routers all have PSTN access in their respective country. So far all is good, and Asterisks interopability with the Cisco CME using SIP is very good, although

Can anyone please help with an astcc problem. I just got it going, but "billed cost" stays 0. The test route is setup with "Inc. Seconds" = 6 and "Cost per additional minute" = 10000. What can the problem be? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.16 - Release Date: 24/05/2005

Hello, Would you please suggest me, where can I buy g723.1 liscence in cheap. I might need a liscence for 10-50 channels. Thanks,