Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "Running clang tests"
2020 Apr 10
4
Running clang tests
Hi,
I’d just like to interject to say that building within Visual Studio isn’t really that bad. Running the lit tests is a bit painful because the LLVM build tools that are integrated with the build system don’t play nice with msbuild. Particularly, I’ve never been able to actually cancel an invocation of lit or tablegen via visual studio. That said, there is a huge upside to building with
2009 May 20
2
prototype.js insert issue
Hi,
I am trying to use the following lines in my RJS and have a problem
page.insert_html :bottom,:list,"<ul>"
#some conditions checks
page.insert_html :bottom,:list,"<li>Hello item</li>"
#some more code to add <li>s
page.insert_html :bottom,:list,"</ul>"
The problem I am having is the first line <<page.insert_html
2009 Apr 29
1
Rails, multiple connections and threads
Hi,
I have a rails app which currently does the following
"After the launch of the page, there is a button click which starts
another ruby script on server using system(ruby <file-name>)" This
execution may take a while around 5-10 mins.
I have following questions
1. While the script is being executed are other connection requests to
server waiting or are there services?
2. Is
2011 Nov 08
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning
On Nov 8, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
> On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
>> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit:
>>
>> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
>>
>> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during
2011 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning
On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit:
>
> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
>
> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your
2020 May 21
1
[llvm][llvm-tblgen][clang-tblgen] MSVC Debug ill-build of clang-tblgen.exe and llvm-tblgen.exe
Hi, everyone.
Does anyone faced with the MSVC Debug build issues of clang-tblgen and llvm-tblgen?
I'm using Windows10 Pro. MSVC and GCC.
Here is my cmake setup: cmake -GNinja ../llvm -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
When building debug with GCC, cmd shows next:
D:\llvm-project\buildn2\bin>clang-tblgen.exe --version
LLVM
2009 Mar 26
2
send_file using AJAX
I have a AJAX based form and when I use send_file there is no pop-up
that appears to prompt user to download file... how do I fix this?
Regards,
Sudhindra
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email
2011 Nov 07
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning
Good day, LLVMers!
We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/
for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during the week. Please build this release candidate, test it out on your projects, and let us know if you find any regressions from the 2.9 release.
Please keep
2008 Jan 27
3
need help opening a file
Hi, I can't believe I am unable to do this. I just installed R (never used
it before, but want to learn it). At present, though. all I want to do is
export a data file (specifically "crabs" in the MASS library) to a text file
for use in SPSS. It allows me to peek into the dataset, using the command
head(crabs) but I can neither view the entire file nor can I seem to export
it to a
2011 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc3 Testing Beginning
On 8 November 2011 18:15, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>> Failing Tests (1):
>> Clang-Unit :: AST/Release/ASTTests/APValue.Diagnostics
>>
>> I've pasted the output of the test below.
>>
> Jay,
>
> Did you see these failures for rc2?
I never tried rc2. I could give it a go tomorrow,
2020 May 29
2
LLVM Support needed
I wanted confirm answer from you guys.
Request you to provide authentic information on this.
Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Minal Kulkarni
Knorr Bremse Technology Center India
Survey No.276, Village Mann, Hinjewadi, Phase II, Tal.Mulshi,
Pune - 411 057. Maharashtra , India.
Phone: +91 9028098122
Mobile:
mailto:minal.kulkarni at knorr-bremse.com
2023 Mar 19
2
lexical scoping for scripts......
Dear Duncun,
What if there is no interactive "session" running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux.
THanking you,
Yours sincerely,
AKSHAY M KULKARNI
________________________________
From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 12:20 AM
To: akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com>; R
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
Again, the answer is "interactivity does not matter".
On March 19, 2023 12:54:28 PM PDT, akshay kulkarni <akshay_e4 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Dear Jeff,
> I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
On 19/03/2023 2:55 p.m., akshay kulkarni wrote:
> Dear Duncun,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What if there is no interactive "session"
> running? I will be running my scripts automatically from crontab in Linux.
I was talking about the session that is created for the duration of the
BATCH run, not some other session that may be running in another
process. Sorry for the
2020 May 28
2
LLVM Support needed
Hello Dear Team,
I wanted to know in which version of LLVM Tricore architecture is supported.
I have LLVM 2.8 with me which has no support for Tricore.
Basically I wanted to add Aurix target support.
Could you please help me.
Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Minal Kulkarni
Knorr Bremse Technology Center India
Survey No.276, Village Mann, Hinjewadi, Phase II, Tal.Mulshi,
Pune - 411
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
Dear Jeff,
I will not be running R command in the shell prompt. So there is no banner, no > prompt. Just running "myscript.R" from the shell prompt. or from crontab in Linux. I think you get the context.....
thanking you,
yours sincerely
AKSHAY M KULKARNI
________________________________
From: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, March
2023 Apr 04
1
on lexical scoping....
No, there are lots of situations where that doesn't make sense. You
don't want to have to define local copies of the functions from every
package you use, for example.
I think the takeaway is to learn how R scoping works, and keep things
simple. That's one reason I tend to avoid "tidyverse" packages. There
are a lot of really good ideas in those packages, but
2013 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Basic Block code sample
Hi LLVM Delveloper,
i've been working on LLVM and Clang to get basic block information. The CFG supports Visitors (CFG.h) but i might want to ask that is there any code sample available so that i can get the things easily..
Regards,
Kulkarni Ashish A.
College of engineering, Pune
India.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2023 Jan 09
3
return value of {....}
Dear Valentin,
But why should {....} "return" a value? It could just as well evaluate all the expressions and store the resulting objects in whatever environment the interpreter chooses, and then it would be left to the user to manipulate any object he chooses. Don't you think returning the last, or any value, is redundant? We are living in the 21st century
2023 Mar 19
1
lexical scoping for scripts......
What do _you_ mean when you use the term "interactive"? Because R distinguishes between executing code in a function and executing code from the global environment, but it does not care whether a person is doing the typing or not.
I get the feeling that you think of your R code in terms of "scripts" when you should be thinking of your code in terms of functions. What