similar to: RFC: dynamic_cast optimization in LTO

Please send any comments. As mentioned at the end I will follow up with some patches as soon as they are cleaned up and I create some test cases. RFC: Safe Whole Program Devirtualization Enablement =================================================== High Level Summary ------------------ The goal of the changes described in this RFC is to support aggressive Whole Program Devirtualization without

<font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"><div><div><div style="box-sizing: inherit;"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="box-sizing: inherit;">Hi,</font></div><div style="box-sizing: inherit;"><font face="Verdana, Arial,

Hello, i downloaded flac for windows source code i extract files like this \flac-1.1.0.tar\flac-1.1.0\src\libFLAC i try to compile libFLAC_static.dsp with VC++ 6 i receive this error Performing Custom Build Step on .\ia32\lpc_asm.nasm '-f' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. Error executing d:\winnt\system32\cmd.exe. can you help me

Hi. Regarding the token approach, I've read some documentation (review D11861, EH in llvm, and Reid and David's presentation) but couldn't answer the following question.Does the intrinsic or the instruction returning a token type object act as a code motion barrier? In other words, does it prevent other operations from being reordered with it?If the answer is no, then does it mean the

Hello, Sorry if this has been still answered, I haven''t found nothing on it. I would love to know why ActiveRecord::Base#last doesn''t return an ActiveRecord::Relation just like all or where since an ActiveRecord::Relation can act more or less like an array (as specified here<https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/0a6833b6f701c8c8febadfe2f45e25df29493602> )? Thanks, have

> On Jan 17, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 01/17/2017 05:36 PM, Wael Yehia via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi. Regarding the token approach, I've read some documentation (review D11861, EH in llvm, and Reid and David's presentation) but couldn't answer the following question. >> Does the intrinsic or the

Hi,I'm trying to prevent llvm instruction motion around an intrinsic function call. Throughout my experimenting, I was told that setjmp could create fake entry points into a region of code and that might prevent code motion.What I found is something surprising, and probably is a misuse of setjmp but I couldn't find an explanation for it.Consider this:#include <csetjmp> std::jmp_buf

Yes, I know that Rails *2.3.x* is no longer fully supported (this is why I''m posting it to rails/issues). Still, I would like to post the topic so that everyone who experience the same problem could quickly google for it (no, afaik no solution for this yet). I''m trying to migrate a 1.5 years *2.3.x* app from Ruby version *1.8.7* to * 1.9.3-p0*. The strange problem I

Hello- I installed CentOS 5.5 on a DELL Machine with ATI Firepro 2260 graphics card. I'm using GNOME for the graphical environment but the display is refreshing very slowly, e.g. scrolling a webpage or moving a window around. Any idea how to solve this issue. Regards, Wael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

... ok, I may be going about this the wrong way, or perhaps, a less efficient way than is optimal, but I would like to test a little bit of AJAX on one of my web pages. When I test this by hand, I bring up the page which shows a select box, I select an item from the drop down list, see another select box show up, go back to the first select box, select a different item, and see something

I have the following: @lot = Lot.find(params[:id]) part_nums = Part.all(:conditions => ["id <> ?", @lot.part.id]) I guess I should mention that Lot :belongs_to => :part I was looking at the log following the execution of these two statements and I saw something like this: Lot Load (0.4ms) SELECT * FROM "lots" WHERE ("lots"."id" = 13) Part

r> <h2>Polycom Phones (updated for 3.2.X firmware with asterisk 1.6.1 Jan/2010= ) </h2>With SIP 3.2.X firmware (available on the Polycom download site)=20 and Asterisk 1.6.1, Polycom phones now support a full featured BLF=20 showing statuses of Ringing, Inuse and Online and one touch directed=20 call pickup. <br>On the asterisk side all that needs to be done is to add a hint

good day i have samba4 work well as PDC in cent os i want to configure samba4 as BDC on ubuntu so i try to follow this tutorial https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC but this commande : # kinit administrator give me this errors: kinit: Improper format of Kerberos configuration file while initializing Kerberos 5 library can any one help me thanks

On 10/29/2017 03:12 PM, H wrote: > On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much >>> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in >>> Centos 7. >> My first guess would be a faulty characters in

On 01/23/2016 06:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > I'll have to be one who has to say that I really am not bothered by GNOME 3. It is better out of the box than GNOME 2 ever was, at least in my opinion, especially that abomination called Nautilus spatial mode. It is a bit irritating that things are either really easy

On 01/25/2016 09:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:20:35PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: >> It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you >> have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't >> monospace. > > The default _is_ monospace (specifically, the monospace system font). Yes and I needed a larger font

On Jan 24, 2016, at 4:47 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > > You can start > applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do people really > want from a DE? Given a choice between Helix GNOME [*] and GNOME 3, I?ll certainly pick Gnome 3. However, it is also a fact that GNOME has some longstanding design misfeatures that should have been fixed

On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 > H wrote: > >> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much >> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in >> Centos 7. > My first guess would be a faulty characters in whatever font you're using. > > Compare it with a working

Hello all, I was wondering how llvm and clang handles the RTTI shared libraries issue mentioned here: http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#dso Is it using name or address comparison? We have an architecture with several frameworks and plug-ins; some of the latter are being loaded and unloaded runtime. In the past that issue caused crashes in our app, so at the moment we are overriding __dynamic_cast to