Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Find uses of Metadata / DITypes"
2018 Jul 24
2
StructType --> DICompositeType?
Is there a more convenient way to obtain a DIType given a Type than matching up the strings for the names?
For example, given:
struct S {
int x, y;
} s;
void foo(S *a) {
a->x = 0;
a->y = 1;
}
There are DIType nodes for the struct Type:
!6 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "S", file: !3, line: 1, size: 64, flags: DIFlagTypePassByValue,
2014 Jul 21
4
[LLVMdev] LTO type uniquing: ODR assertion failure
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:41 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie
2014 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] LTO type uniquing: ODR assertion failure
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Manman Ren
2014 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] LTO type uniquing: ODR assertion failure
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> We still have access to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that
>> assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire
>>
>> i.e
2015 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] `Ty && "Trying to add a type that doesn't exist?
Hello,
I'm having this error and couldn't find a resolution from online, any help
would be greatly appreciated:
clang:
/export/home/hzhang86/chapel/chapel-llvm36/chapel/third-party/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:839:
void llvm::DwarfUnit::addType(llvm::DIE&, llvm::DIType,
llvm::dwarf::Attribute): Assertion `Ty && "Trying to add a type that
doesn't
2015 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] `Ty && "Trying to add a type that doesn't exist?
I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846
On Jun 4, 2015 12:04 PM, "Hui Zhang" <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any clue for this error ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having this error and couldn't find a
2015 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] `Ty && "Trying to add a type that doesn't exist?
Upgrade clang? I can't reproduce it with trunk.
On 4 June 2015 at 14:48, Hui Zhang <wayne.huizhang at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I found this link, but what's the solution??
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Rafael Espíndola
> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16846
>>
>> On
2013 Sep 30
1
[LLVMdev] [patch] Prototype/proof-of-concept for DWARF type units
This isn't a realistic/viable implementation, just a hacked up "can I make
it produce the right output" kind of thing, but while I hammer out a few
more details (like fixing MC to allow multiple sections with the same name
but different comdat groups) I figured I'd throw it out there to have a bit
of a chat about it.
I've tested simple cases of a single type and they seem to
2009 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] DebugFactory
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is a patch that does just that.
This does not work. I'm getting
llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp: In member function
‘llvm::DIType clang::CodeGen::CGDebugInfo::CreateQualifiedType(clang::QualType,
llvm::DICompileUnit)’:
/Users/yash/clean/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp:225:
error:
2014 Jul 14
3
[LLVMdev] LTO type uniquing: ODR assertion failure
We still have access to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that
assumes all accesses to DITypes are accessing the resolved DIType will fire
i.e assert(Ty == resolve(Ty.getRef()))
One example is the access to DIType via DIArray in SubroutineType. If all
elements in the type array are DITypes we can create a DITypeArray and use
that for SubroutineType's type array instead. But we
2009 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] DebugFactory
OK so the problem is that the compiler sees '0' and can't decide whether its
an integer or a null pointer of type Constant *. I guess the new functions
will have to have slightly different names.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is a patch
2009 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] DebugFactory
Here is a patch that does just that.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Talin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
2018 Jul 25
2
A question to the DWARF experts on symbol indirection
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Tim
> Northover via llvm-dev
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:07 AM
> To: Nat!
> Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] A question to the DWARF experts on symbol
> indirection
>
> Hi Nat!,
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 at 01:21, Nat! via
2014 Nov 10
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Separating Metadata from the Value hierarchy
> On 2014-Nov-10, at 08:30, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 9, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>> In response to my recent commits (e.g., [1]) that changed API from
>> `MDNode` to `Value`, Eric had a really interesting idea [2] -- split
>> metadata entirely from the `Value` hierarchy, and
2016 Mar 30
3
[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata
I have no objections to any of this FWIW :)
-eric
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-Mar-22, at 20:11, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:04 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> +pcc, who had some other
2009 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] DebugFactory
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Talin wrote:
>>>
>>> // Calculate the size of the specified LLVM type.
>>> Constant * DebugInfoBuilder::getSize(const Type * type) {
>>> Constant * one =
2016 Mar 30
0
[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata
> On 2016-Mar-22, at 20:11, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:04 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +pcc, who had some other ideas/patch out for improving memory usage of debug info
>> +Reid, who's responsible for the windows/CodeView/PDB debug info which is motivating some of the ideas about
2017 Oct 01
2
load with alignment of 1 crashes from being unaligned
Below is attached a full IR module that can reproduce this issue, but the
part to notice is this:
%Foo96Bits = type <{ i24, i24, i24, i24 }>
define internal fastcc i16 @main.0.1() unnamed_addr #2 !dbg !113 {
Entry:
%value = alloca %Foo96Bits, align 1
%b = alloca i24, align 4
%0 = bitcast %Foo96Bits* %value to i8*, !dbg !129
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* %0, i8* bitcast
2016 Sep 30
2
DebugInfo: purpose of align field
Hello Adrian, sorry for the delay with the response. Somehow I missed
your message..
On 09/13/2016 12:43 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>> On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Victor Leschuk via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am currently implementing support for DWARFv5 DW_AT_alignment attr and I got a question about align field in
2016 Mar 23
2
[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:04 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> +pcc, who had some other ideas/patch out for improving memory usage of
> debug info
> +Reid, who's responsible for the windows/CodeView/PDB debug info which is
> motivating some of the ideas about changes to type emission
>
>
So I discussed this with Adrian and Mehdi at the social last