similar to: [GSoC] Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations

Hi to Both, Praveen, I think you didn't CC Johannes. :) I'll give it a try. Best, Stefanos Στις Τρί, 24 Μαρ 2020 στις 9:44 μ.μ., ο/η Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> έγραψε: > Hi Nader, > I have cc'ed the project mentor. He is the best person to help you here. > All the best. > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 20:42, Nader Al Awar via

Greetings everyone, I am Abhay Raj Singh, a 2nd-year student at NIT Hamirpur, Bharat(India). I am very interested in the project titled "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations" I would like to apologize for contacting so late I had midterm examination, finished recently. I have taken a course on OpenMP from YouTube which was supported by Intel I have ~4-5 years of

Hello! My name is Emanuel and I am an undergraduate student from Brazil (at the University of São Paulo) wanting to participate in this years GSoC on LLVM. Specifically, on the "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations" project. I currently do research on autotuning of LLVM IR optimization passes and I am sitting for a class about parallel computing, but I have been studying

Awesome, thanks! As per your suggestion, I read the description of these two projects: Advanced Heuristics for Ordering Compiler Optimization Passes Machine learning and compiler optimizations: using inter-procedural analysis to select optimizations and they are amazing! Indeed, they are very close to my interest in autotuning. I didn't see them on the list before. If I choose to focus on

Hi Johannes: 1. Attached is the submitted PDF. 2. I have a notes section where I state: I am still unsure of the GPU extension I proposed as I dont know how LLVM plays into the GPU cross over space like how nvcc (Nvidia's compiler integrates gcc and PTX) does.I dont know if there is a chance that function graphs in the CPU+GPU name spaces are seamless/continupus within nvcc or if nvcc is just

Hi Jean-Marc, We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other words, what is not stable about that branch? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -----Original Message----- From:

1. Thanks for the clarifications. I will stick to non-containerized OS X for now. 2. As an aside, I did try to build a Debian docker container by git cloning into it and using the Dockerfile in LLVM/utils/docker as a starting point: - some changes needed to updated packages (GCC in particular needs to be latest) and the Debian image (Debian 9 instead of Debian 8) pretty much sets up the docker

Hi Hamilton, I personally don't believe the effort to make the IR "parallelism-aware" is worth it right now. What I propose is something else, see for example https://youtu.be/zfiHaPaoQPc and the OpenMPOpt pass. There are multiple bigger tasks towards better offloading, one of which is described here https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/180 It might be interesting to add the

I have tried to install the RODBC package with the next command: > install.packages(("ORDBC"), (lib="usr/lib/R/library")) But it is failed. Can I get some information about the installation of this package anywhere? Best regards, Nader -------------------------------------------------------------- Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html

I am a grad CS student at Stanford and wanted to engage with EJ Park, Giorgis Georgakoudis, Johannes Doerfert to further develop the Machine Learning and Compiler Optimization concept. My background is in machine learning, cluster computing, distributed systems etc. I am a good C/C++ developer and have a strong background in algorithms and data structure. I am also taking an advanced compiler

Hi there!, As part of my application process to the next GSoC I'm working on the TODO in OpenMPOpt.cpp line 437:     // TODO: We should validate the declaration agains the types we expect.     Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/OpenMPOpt.cpp#L437 I have a question. When there is a mismatch in the types (return type or argument types) between

On 03/16, Fahad Nayyar wrote: > I can see that Johanned have put up some issues for GSOC aspirants. I think > that [2] <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/179> ([Attributor] > Cleanup and upstream `Attribute::MaxObjectSize`) will be a very good issue > for me, It seems doable and I can get familiar with the whole process of > writing a patch for an issue. How should I

Hi there Johannes!, I was checking out the issue (about latency hiding when transferring memory from host to device) you posted about a week ago, but it's not there anymore. Did you remove it?. Thanks. Hamilton. On 21/03/20 10:04 p. m., Hamilton Tobon Mosquera via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi there!, > > Right now I'm starting with the project proposed by Johannes here: >

Hi Johannes - great we are engaging on this. Some responses now and some later. 1. When you say setup LLVM dev environment +. clang + tools etc, do you mean setup LLVM compiler code from the repo and build it locally? If so, yes, this is all done from my end - that is, I have built all this on my machine and compiled and run a couple of function passes. I have look at some LLVM emits from clang

Ahhh I understand. So I believe the project you posted is still opened. Do you any advice on the question I posted before?. Thank you. On 22/03/20 1:26 p. m., Doerfert, Johannes wrote: > I did not. The issues sections on GH was removed. > > ________________________________________ > From: Hamilton Tobon Mosquera <htobonm at eafit.edu.co> > Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:21

Hi Johannes, Yes, I'm highly interested, I already started. It would be nice if you post the details again. I didn't take note of them, I was always looking at the issue in GH. The problem I'm facing right now is this: The first task is identifying OpenMP API calls referred to device memory allocation. I first understood how the compiler driver orchestrates the process of offloading

Greetings, I'm an LLVM newcomer interested in participating in the next GSoC under the project "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations". I've already read "Compiler Optimizations for OpenMP" and "Compiler Optimizations for Parallel Programs" both by Doerfert and Finkel. Also, I've watched their two LLVM meeting developers conferences

Hi there! I have some data in POSIXlt format: 2009-07-18 5:53:00 2008-11-23 7:27:00 2008-11-24 5:25:00 and would like to extract information about only the minutes of the day, like: 5:53 --> 353 minutes 7:27 --> 447 minutes can you help me? Carlos Nader [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, It is very simple question. I want to go to the parent directory and give the 'system("cd ../") commnad. But it stayes at the same dirctory as before. Do I forget to give some extra parameter to system command in this case? Regards, Nader -------------------------------------------------------------- Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html

Hi all, My name is Fahad Nayyar. I am an undergraduate student from India. I am interested to participate in GSOC under the project “Improve inter-procedural analyses and optimizations”. I have been using LLVM for the past 8 months. I have written various intra-procedural analysis in LLVM as FunctionPass for my course projects and research projects. But I’ve not contributed to the LLVM